Thursday, July 31, 2025

Where the Historic District Ends

Back in 2010, I discovered this advertisement in a February 1867 issue of the Hudson Daily Register.


Those "Desirable Houses in Hudson," constructed on spec during Hudson's post-Civil War building boom, are these houses on North Fifth Street, between Warren and Columbia streets. 


In 2018, the picture below, taken in 1967, showing the four houses a hundred years after they were built, was posted on Facebook by Bob Satter. (The third floor on 18 North Fifth Street, with its mansard roof, was very likely added toward the end of the 19th century, when Second Empire was all the rage.)


In 1967, the front porches on two of the houses--18 and 20--were enclosed. Today, the porches on two of the houses--20 and 22--are missing.


The houses are outside any locally designated historic district. The Warren Street Historic District extends north only as far as Prison Alley, and the Armory Historic District begins a block away, at State Street, and extends north to Clinton Street.  


In the block and a half between locally designated historic districts is this row of houses--37 to 47 North Fifth Street--built by Freeman Coons in 1870. It was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 2002.


Although listed in the state and national registers, the row of houses at 37-47 North Fifth Street are not in any locally designated historic district, so any alterations to the facades of the buildings would not require review by or a certificate of appropriateness from the Historic Preservation Commission. The same is true for 20 and 22 North Fifth Street.

According to code enforcement officer Craig Haigh, both 20 and 22 North Fifth Street are undergoing "full renovations for single family homes," which is what they started out as and what they were when most recently occupied. Haigh did not respond to a question about plans for the facades. The current owner of the two houses may be planning to do the right thing and create new porches that replicate the original porches (as seen in the 1967 photograph) and those now found on 18 and 24, but we don't know that.

The situation on North Fifth Street is yet another reason why the Historic Preservation Commission should venture out of its comfort zone and work to expand the areas of the city that have historic preservation protections. All of the historic districts that currently exist were created in a two-year window of time: 2006-2007. During that period, too, HPC applied for and received a Preserve New York grant for $9,000 from the Preservation League of New York State to survey and document buildings on the north side of town, the part of the city that was not surveyed in 1985, when the National Register Hudson Historic District was created. The purpose of that study was to inform the creation of new historic districts, but that never happened.  

In 2011, an initiative by Historic Hudson to create a Robinson Street Historic District memorably went down in flames. In 2018, an attempt by the HPC to extend the southern and western boundaries of the Union-Allen-South Front Street Historic District was ultimately abandoned after Council president Tom DePietro tabled the resolution that would have made it happen, alleging that the resolution and the accompanying documents had not been properly prepared and that some of the property owners affected by the boundary amendments had not been notified. (The allegation was based on an error in the map having to do with Worth Avenue, the eastern boundary of the district, which was not changing in any way as a consequence of the resolution.)


Over the years, the HPC has received requests from Historic Hudson (and suggestions from The Gossips of Rivertown) to extend the historic district north along Fourth Street to capture the area from the North Fourth Street Extension (created on the initiative of property owners and residents of North Fourth Street between Prison Alley and Columbia Street) to the locally designated landmark (and individually listed in the National Register of Historic Places) Hudson Almshouse. Those requests/suggestions were never pursued by the HPC. If they had been, the HPC would be able to weigh in on the design for Kearney Realty's other proposal for Hudson: State Street Lofts--a building that would be oriented toward an alley (Long Alley) instead of an actual street (North Fourth Street or State Street).


The Historic Preservation Commission is the most hardworking and efficient of Hudson's regulatory boards. It meets twice a month--regularly--and its decisions are typically rendered in a matter of weeks rather than years, as is the case with the City's current Planning Board. On a few occasions, the HPC has been duped, as Stanley Moon was by the Devil in Bedazzled, because certificates of appropriateness were not worded carefully enough, but overall, the HPC has been a bulwark, protecting the authenticity of Hudson's architecture and the historic character of our city. One criticism of the HPC, however, is that it has not been proactive or sufficiently resolute in expanding the areas of Hudson protected by the City's preservation ordinance.

Thanks to former mayor Rick Scalera, all historic preservation designations must be made by the Common Council. Perhaps new leadership on the Council will change things.
COPYRIGHT 2025 CAROLE OSTERINK

2 comments:

  1. Historic district or not, the gravel sidewalk in front of the 2 houses on 5th has remained for far too long. Code Enforcement should have told the contractor to remove the stones and create an ADA-compliant sidewalk at least 8 or 9 months ago, soon after the concrete sidewalk was removed. It fails the baby stroller and wheelchair test miserably. Where is the ADA coordinator? Where is the Public Works Board? Where is DPW? Where is the mayor? Where is Code Enforcement? Where is the sanity and respect? Where is the long stretch of concrete sidewalk on the way to and from essential city services in a residential area full of pedestrians, and how much longer will it be missing? Oh, and it's ugly, just as the porta john that recently appeared is!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Paul Barrett, who is the historian member of the HPC, sent me the following email about 20 and 22 North Fifth Street and agreed to let me publish it as a comment:

    The owners of 20 & 22 N Fifth have every intention of returning the porches/steps/railings to their historic appropriateness. When they acquired these two buildings they were in very poor condition as the previous owners warehoused them for years and left them to go to ruin.
    The porches were removed as the front of the buildings needed to be excavated to put in new water, sewer and gas lines. All had deteriorated from non use and the water line was lead. The porches too were in a very deteriorated condition. They were rotten through and through requiring a total rebuild.
    Construction sites are never pretty nor is the work ever quick. The porta john is required by code and the sidewalks will be replaced with bluestone when the time comes.
    This owners completed a beautiful restoration of another significant building here in Hudson and reside in another important historic house in the county of which they are tremendous stewards.
    They are not within the confines of the HPC with the Fourth Street buildings as you indicated. However, their approach and sensitivity to the improvement of these buildings is as if they were. The thoroughness and care here is of their own passion and appreciation of history, architecture, and sense of place. Hudson is lucky to have them.
    As a member of the Hudson Preservation Commission, your point is well taken that there are still pockets of the city that leave so much of our great Hudson architecture unprotected and vulnerable. With the owners of 20 and 22 North Fifth, we lucked out.

    ReplyDelete