tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723709701684173708.post237416862116691123..comments2024-03-28T17:55:31.180-04:00Comments on The Gossips of Rivertown: They're BackCarole Osterinkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16010623982526286408noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723709701684173708.post-18816790339094875082018-03-19T21:18:59.793-04:002018-03-19T21:18:59.793-04:00"vine like planted material"
how quaint... "vine like planted material"<br /><br />how quaintVincenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05548912912359709568noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723709701684173708.post-19255745165989136832018-03-19T20:54:32.336-04:002018-03-19T20:54:32.336-04:00It appears that only two of the NYSDOS's eleve...It appears that only two of the NYSDOS's eleven "Criteria for General [Coastal] Concurrence" applied in the circumstances. <br /><br />1. "Other than for the exercise of riparian or littoral rights the activity is entirely on property owned or otherwise authorized by the owner for use by the proponent of the activity."<br /><br />Yes, CSX owns the bluff beneath the Promenade.<br /> <br />2. "The activity is compatible with community character in design, size, and materials."<br /><br />Other than ownership, everything turned on this single criterion presented here in its entirety. This tells us that the DOS made an aesthetic call on our behalves, and also against our wishes. <br /><br />The Criteria for General Concurrence is found in Section 9, page 13:<br /><br />https://www.dos.ny.gov/opd/programs/pdfs/NY_CMP.pdfunheimlichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00204285837938988668noreply@blogger.com