Thursday, May 14, 2026

Another "Transformative" Project

Jeffery Dodson, executive director of the Hudson Housing Authority, regularly describes HHA's proposed redevelopment as "transformative." On Tuesday, a new project was presented to the Planning Board that was also described as "transformative." The project, which has the working title "Waterfront Village," was presented by Ben Fain, who brought us Kitty's, The Caboose, and Mr. Cat Brasserie and owns the The Wick Hotel and the historic Robert Taylor House, the former which is being renovated and the latter meticulously restored. The new project will cover a 6.82-acre site at the end of South Second Street, which, until thirty or so years ago, was the location of a factory that made humidifiers and similar products. 


The project will be carried out in three phases. Phase 1 involves a grocery store, parking, landscaping, and the creation of a street grid that extends the street pattern of the rest of the city to this site.


Every proposed street on the site would have sidewalks on both sides. In the center, there would be a large open space, "almost like a central park." 

Phase 2 of the project involves the construction of a retail building, "intentionally angled toward the train station."


Phase 3 of the project is an apartment building, which is currently proposed to have 150 units.


The project was described as "an extension of Hudson," a "walkable, mixed-use neighborhood," "incorporating a lot of landscaping to make the pedestrian experience enjoyable." Fain, who told the Planning Board he "really drank the Kool-Aid on believing what Hudson can be," predicted the district "could become the most welcoming section of Hudson." It was also said that, with the development, there would be "a real destination for the Second Street stairs," which lead down to the site from Allen Street.


Members of the Planning Board raised a number of issues. Sara Black wanted to know how this project differed from the Kearney project proposed for Mill Street, maintaining they were both on dead-end streets and in a flood plain. She also asked about the intended market for the residential units. Someone else raised concerns about the project interfering with the views from Deer Alley. Ron Bogle, who chairs the Planning Board, opined, "You are disturbing the lives of the people on Tanners Lane in way they cannot even imagine." Concern was expressed about possible exclusivity in programming for the open space.

A surprising concern was expressed by Veronica Conca, who maintained that Hudson "has never had a big supermarket" and seemed to imply that, in the divine order of things, Hudson residents were meant go to Greenport if they wanted to buy paper towels or toilet paper or anything that went beyond simply the ingredients needed to prepare a meal. She seemed to have forgotten, if she ever knew, that Sam's Supermarket operated at 310 Warren Street (now the gymnasium of The Maker Hotel) until 1994, and reopened briefly as the Hudson Supermarket a few years later. 


Her comment also revealed that she had no idea that Hudson once had several supermarkets. There was an A&P at the corner of Seventh and Columbia streets, where Proprietors Hall now stands.

Photo by Gibson
There was a First National Store (the chain now known as Finast) at 751 Warren Street, in the building that currently houses the Social Security Administration office.

Photo courtesy Bob Tomaso
The building at 713 Union Street, which now houses the Mental Health Association of Columbia & Greene Counties, was originally a Grand Union.
 
Photo by Gibson
And there were others, as folks who grew up in Hudson in the '50s, '60s, and '70s will likely recall. 

According to the materials submitted to the Planning Board, the grocery store/supermarket is proposed to be 15,915 square feet. A Google search yielded this information about the average size of supermarkets in the United States:
The average conventional grocery store in the United States is approximately 38,000 to 42,000 square feet. While traditional supermarkets hover around 40,000 square feet, the industry is seeing a shift toward smaller, more urban formats (12,000-25,000 sq ft), while large, suburban supercenters can exceed 187,000 square feet.
Of interest, back in 2018, at a DRI public workshop, a retail specialist on the planning team assigned to Hudson reported that Hudson residents spent $5 million annually at the supermarkets of Greenport. She suggested that Hudson could support a 10,000 square foot grocery store. Gossips research at the time found that the only supermarket chain with stores as small as 10,000 square feet was Trader Joe's. That information is eight years old, and there is no indication that the grocery store proposed as part of this project will be part of a chain.

At the meeting on Tuesday, the Planning Board determined the project to be an unlisted action under SEQR (State Environmental Quality Review) and declared itself lead agency in the SEQR process.
COPYRIGHT 2026 CAROLE OSTERINK

13 comments:

  1. Re: Dr Black "wanted to know how this project differed from the Kearney project proposed for Mill Street, maintaining they were both on dead-end streets and in a flood plain."

    Hmmmmmm....

    Let's compare Waterfront Village to Mill Street

    - Capital at Risk: Private (good) vs. Public funds (bad)
    - Tax Base: One adds massive tax revenue (good), other is neutral to negative (bad)
    - Use: One is mixed use (good), the other single use (bad).
    - Who it serves: One serves all (good), one serves a very narrow population (bad).
    - Transformation: One transforms a former industrial area, the other destroys a park (alienation)

    Both create jobs during construction, but only one (Waterfront Village) creates permanent jobs, permanent sales tax revenue for the County, lodging tax revenue (for Hudson), and permanent jobs.

    The city was awarded a big DRI for that area and the staircase, sidewalk, and road from the train station to the City is still patchy at best. Government is not good at building things...

    Here is a fun question: how much exactly has Mr. Fain, Bliss Towers / HHA , and the proposed Kearney Project, paid the City of Hudson in taxes per year, and over the last decade? Or will they pay when all their dream building are done.

    In 2030.... we'd guess that Fain will be paying almost a $1m in some type of tax per year, likely more, and Bliss and Kearney will be below $50k a year.

    This is no doubt a very complex project with many trade-offs, and we should all thank Mr. Bogle (and Mayor Ferris who appointed him) for presiding over the PB process dutifully.

    But the Planning Board will do well to remember that a City either grows or dies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IIRC, the specific question was more about egress which is where Mill St and the Waterfront Village share some properties.

      The irony is that Colarusso currently owns the second route of egress in form of the haul road. Not sure how willing they would be to work with Fain if this topic became an issue.

      Who this proposed development will serve meanwhile, we can't yet say. If the grocery store indeed becomes a Hawthorne Valley farm store, as has been the rumor, its appeal isn't going to be as wide as it would be if it were an Aldi. I would also expect that the proposed housing will be priced on the higher end.

      The upside of that on the other hand is that there probably won't be a PILOT involved.

      Delete
    2. There already is an Aldi's nearby, why would another be needed down there? An expanded Rolling Grocer with tiered pricing would be better, but the current location is actually more convenient.

      Delete
    3. Unfortunately, yeah, everyone asks for a pilot. I think the Boulavards have been the only ones recently to not ask for one. But I get why everyone tries. It would be nice to see a moratorium on the practice.

      Delete
  2. South Front is such an awful traffic street -- the track crossings, the trucks, Amtrak at the bottom of a steep hill, the number of cars and pedestrians when the train lets off dozens of visitors, hardly any parking, the narrow and dangerous intersection at the bend at the bridge, limited visibility for drivers exiting cross streets, no bike lanes. What South Front does not need is more traffic, and certainly not lots more. It's already awful; that area can't handle much more traffic because it's not designed for it. There's only one way in and one way out. Come down the hill, head back up the hill.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am in favor. It's a great idea and from how they developed Kittys, Caboose, it will be fantastic and done in good taste in addition to helping support the community in many ways as listed above. Also, yes to a [good] supermarket... going to Greenport for "food/groceries" is a complete buzzkill. Hating on this plan is just another vote for more of Colarusso dominating the waterfront. Personally I hate those trucks and the citizens of Hudson deserve better. Look at all the wonderfully developed waterfronts of towns along the Amtrak route - let's move Hudson forward and not keep going backwards, please.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great idea! Now if only we had a gravel dump and industrial truck route to complement all this new development!

    ReplyDelete
  5. What about additional sewage ?
    Currently,the very ripe stench coming from the treatment plant nearly every day and particulary at night is assaulting the residents of lower Hudson. This is not a new problem. Apparently, there is a serious inability to keep up with the additional sewage being added to the system with all the new aprtment development.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why the obsession with apartment buildings and construction? It's good for developers pockets, but what's charming about Hudson is it's small scale, why junk it up to be like every place else? The idea that a "city has to grow or die" is absurd. There are plenty of small rural cities and towns that have remained the same size for decades. This is what happens when real estate values climb, it's like a smell that attracts vultures. They all start circling about, looking for their next meal. What is really needed isn't more overpriced upscale apartments, but hard scale rent control and regulation to lower the costs for people living here now. We need Section 8 for everyone and income tiered property taxes!

    ReplyDelete
  7. This looks great and a good use of otherwise post industrial blight. It makes you wonder what could have been at 11 Warren. I’m glad they are doing the grocery store first. It would be nice to have an option in actual walkable Hudson besides leaving to the bummer big box stores on Fairview or the expensive “provisions” type food boutiques.

    As far as comparison to Mill Street… has anyone looked at the actual FEMA flood maps? I’ve seen Mill Street flood over several times in the past year. I’ve never seen much flooding around that side of Front Street, except for the Boat Club. Also, this was abandoned warehouses bought from the city (HDC) at fair market value. Not some sweetheart giveaway of park land to developers. Plus, this will be tax positive, rather than a tax drain that Mill St would be. Also, new large developments must now pay credits for the new separated sewer system.

    As for the people who hate growth. There are plenty of towns in Herkimer County where you can see first hand what happens to towns that stagnate. You can get John Mellencamp to write a song about it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't see much chance that we're ever going to see a Planning Board with the backbone to stand up to Colarusso, so my best strategy to get rid of that noxious operation is to surround it with so much good stuff that it ultimately becomes apparent to even the dimmest bulbs in our community that there is a better future for the Hudson waterfront. Thanks to Ben Fain and Basilica for all the good work!

    ReplyDelete