This post might better be titled "Nothing Is Ever Easy," but that title was already used once this week.
If you are going to revise the city charter, who would you want crafting the proposed changes? The task promises to be an arduous and tedious one. The charter is not a simple document. It is the framework for how a municipality governs itself. Given that, it would seem reasonable to want people assigned to the task who can think analytically, are willing to do the hard work, are familiar with the charter as it exists now, and have knowledge of how government functions. Not everyone fits the criteria.
At the Common Council meeting on Tuesday, Council president Margaret Morris presented for discussion a proposed local law establishing a charter revision commission. She explained that there were basically three ways to approach charter revision: the mayor can appoint a charter commission; the Common Council can appoint a charter commission; a citizens' group can form to propose revision. "At the end of the day," Morris told the Council, "everything ends up on the ballot for referendum."
According to the proposed law, the commission would consist of seven members. Six would be community members appointed by the Council president, and the Council president would serve ex officio as the seventh member. At the meeting, Morris amended the suggested makeup of the commission to include the Council majority leader as an ex officio member. She explained that, since announcing her intention to create a charter revision commission, members of the public had approached her and expressed interest in serving on the commission. She had five people in mind who might serve. She did not, however, disclose who those five people were.
Jennifer Belton (Fourth Ward) was the first councilmember to comment, saying she wanted the selection process to be "more open and inclusive." She objected that she didn't know who the five people were. Morris responded, "These are people who raised their hands and said they are willing to do the work."
Claire Cousin (Fifth Ward) said she agreed with Belton, and Gary Purnhagen opined, "It's hard to fully reflect Hudson with seven people." Belton suggested that each ward should be represented on the commission. She noted there was a problem with the citizens' group that proposed a charter amendment last year "because they all looked alike."
Ken Dow, counsel to the Council, explained that, once a commission is established, "a lot of what they do is dictated by New York State law."
During the public comment period, Ron Kopnicki pointed out that the Common Council could constitute itself as a charter revision commission. Matt McGhee called for a public hearing on starting a commission. Lloyd Koedding wanted the five people Morris had chosen identified, suggesting they "might have an agenda." He went on to allege that last year's Citizens' Initiative for Charter Change "had it out for the mayor."
Morris invited councilmembers (and presumably also the public) to send their comments about the proposed law to her, indicating that she wanted to bring a revised version of the law before the Council at its August meeting. She also made the point that meetings of the charter revision commission would be open meetings.
COPYRIGHT 2026 CAROLE OSTERINK












