The major purpose of last night's special Planning Board meeting was to review the design of the proposed buildings. In March, Quncie Williams, the architect from Alexander Gorlin Architects who said he was the architect for the project, made a presentation to the Planning Board and got a tad huffy when Planning Board member Peter Spear pressed him about the relationship of the renderings to what would be the final product. Last night, Alex Gorlin himself was there to make the presentation. Interestingly, he identified himself as the design architect and did not mention Williams.
Gorlin began by saying his firm has worked with Mountco, HHA's development partner, for the past fifteen years, "doing a number of award-winning projects." He proceeded to show pictures of some of those projects: Neremiah Spring Creek in East New York;
The Brook in the Bronx;
Boston Road in the Bronx;
and El Borinquen Residence in the Bronx.
He maintained that all of these buildings were "designed not to look affordable but to look market rate."
In demonstrating his credentials for the project, Gorlin also mentioned his book, Housing the Nation: Social Equity, Architecture, and the Future of Affordable Housing, which is actually a collection of essays by other people that he co-edited with architectural historian Victoria Newhouse.
He then launched into a history of the site, which he described as being in its earliest time "near whale fishing docks." The visuals started with an 1838 map of Hudson and ended with this is still from the 1959 film Odds Against Tomorrow.
He explained they were "trying to bring back the bustling urbanism of Hudson." (An aside: Gossips was just on Warren Street and can attest that Hudson does not need any help to bring back its bustling urbanism. That might have been true thirty years ago, but it certainly isn't now.)
Gorlin pointed out, as he has done before, that the open space that is part of the redevelopment plan is the same size as the Public Square, a.k.a. Seventh Street Park. He asserted that the open space could be "designed wonderfully to be one of the great parks of the city."
When Planning Board member Veronica Conca asked if there would be more open space than there currently is around Bliss Towers, Gorlin didn't actually answer the question. Instead he said, "It won't feel like leftover space." Interestingly, two weeks ago, when the Planning Board was reviewing plans for the proposed "Waterfront Village," on the other end of Second Street, members of the Planning Board worried that the open space included in that project would be "exclusive." No one expressed similar concerns about the open space proposed for this project.
Gorlin's presentation provided lots of new renderings. These two which show essentially models of what the site will look like when Phase 1 is completed and what it will look like when Bliss Towers and Columbia Apartments have been demolished and Phase 2 is completed.
There are also these renderings, which show the project from various vantage points on the site. The inset in the bottom right indicates the vantage point for each one. A couple of them assume that Phase 2 is already completed.
Gorlin said he had "looked to the texture of the city on Warren Street to pull that into what we're doing and especially the scale and the use of brick and bay windows." He noted, "We're doing four-story buildings in keeping with the general height of the city itself." Despite the talk about texture and scale and buildings that "align harmoniously into the community," not one of the renderings presented by Gorlin shows the project in actual context. What will people walking on Warren Street see when look to the north at Second Street? What will drivers see when they turn north onto Second from Warren Street? What will people leaving the dog park see after they've pulled up the steep hill and are approaching State Street? And maybe the biggest question: Why did Gorlin say they were building four-story buildings when the renderings clearly show five stories?
Gorlin called Bliss Towers "a good example of bad urbanism." One wonders what fifty years from now people will call what is currently being proposed.
More to come.
COPYRIGHT 2026 CAROLE OSTERINK












.jpg)

