Sidewalks have been a topic of discussion in Hudson for years. In all discussions of sidewalks, many of which are admittedly in bad shape and unsafe, not just safety but also uniformity have been put forward as goals to be achieved. Back in September 2018, Rob Perry, Superintendent of Public Works, pointed out a problem with the quest for uniformity. At a meeting of the then Public Works and Parks Committee, he showed pictures of some of the most handsome sidewalks in Hudson--sidewalks that had one thing in common: they are not in compliance with city code.
Insistence on uniformity would also eliminate the many bluestone sidewalks that have survived for more than 150 years in the city.
At the meeting of the Common Council Code and Infrastructure Committee this week, Perry brought up another issue that makes uniformity problematic. The city code is inconsistent when it comes to the required width of the sidewalks. In one place, the code indicates sidewalks must be 4 feet wide; in other, it specifies 5 feet. The committee seemed interested in eliminating the inconsistency, but how might they do that?
In the oldest parts of the city, the position of the houses in relation to the street would make a 5-foot width requirement challenging, and it would eliminate altogether creating wells for street trees on these blocks.
UPDATE: After this post was published, Public Works Superintendent Rob Perry contacted Gossips to explain that, after the committee meeting in September 2018, Jeff Baker, who was the city attorney at the time, recommended that the Council amend the code to allow for sidewalks of nonstandard materials. Subsequently, the clause "unless permission in writing is granted by the Commissioner of Public Works" was added to Chapter 266-2 C (3) of the city code:
No material other than the mix above specified shall hereafter be used for the construction or reconstruction or repair of sidewalks in the City of Hudson, unless permission in writing is granted by the Commissioner of Public Works.
One hopes the current Commissioner of Public Works, Tyler Kritzman, who sits on the Public Works Board, as well as our new Code Enforcement Officer Nick Fox are aware of this clause.
At a recent Historic Preservation Commission meeting, Matt McGhee brought up the historic brick sidewalk on South First Street, running along the west side of the street from Union Street to Cherry Alley. The proposed demolition and replacement of the garage behind 30 Union Street is currently being reviewed by the HPC, and McGhee expressed concern that the sidewalk in front of the proposed new building be repaired and preserved.
Responding to McGhee's concerns, someone pointed out that the sidewalk was not in compliance with code, seemingly dismissing the notion that the sidewalk should or could be preserved. Actually, given the clause in the code, it does not seem the case that all nonconforming sidewalks need to be replaced so long as they are or can be restored to be ADA compliant.COPYRIGHT 2026 CAROLE OSTERINK