Advocates for the move to JLE maintain that making City Hall ADA compliant is cost prohibitive. At the September Common Council meeting, Council president Tom DePietro stated that the "rough estimate" for doing so was more than $3 million. On her Facebook page this morning, Fourth Ward supervisor Linda Mussmann asserted that the City's historic buildings are "outrageously expensive to upgrade." It's a convenient argument, but it's not entirely true.
The feasibility study done on City Hall by Lacey Thaler Reilly Wilson, the same architectural firm that is doing the feasibility study on JLE, yielded four possible plans for making the building ADA compliant. Three of the plans would provide access to the main floor, where all city business takes place--attending meetings, making tax payments and water and sewer payments, visiting the assessor, securing and renewing licences. The fourth plan, which is the expensive one, is a complete renovation and redesign of the building, with an extension at the rear that would house an elevator. Here are the four plans and the estimated cost associated with each.
Plan 1 $278,000
This plan involves the creation of accessible parking spaces on Warren Street and Prison Alley, a lift at the main entrance, a sloped walk along the west side of the building, modifications to the door on the west side, the creation of an accessible rest room, and modifications to the Council Chamber.
Plan 2 $262,000
Plan 2 is basically the same as Plan 1 except instead of a lift at the main entrance there would be a ramp in front of the building, which would take up much of the sidewalk.
Plan 3 $131,000
Plan 3--the least expensive solution--involves installing a lift at the side door on Warren Street, the doorway that now gives access to the upstairs offices of the mayor, the mayor's aide, Council president, and the Department of Public Works.
Plan 4 $3,143,000
This is the expensive one. It would provide universal access to the entire building and create a City Hall, in a city known for its historic architecture, that would definitely inspire civic pride. With Plan 4, there would be an addition at the back of the building, with an elevator, giving access to all floors, including the basement storage area. The building would be completely accessible from both Warren Street and Prison Alley. There would be additional office space and an improved Council Chamber. Perhaps the best thing, the atrium that was part of the interior design of the original bank building would be opened up once again, and the glorious stained glass laylight, which no one who hasn't had reason to visit the Department of Public Works map room has ever seen, will be visible from the main floor.
COPYRIGHT 2019 CAROLE OSTERINK
Plan 4 makes the most sense and it would be well worth it to save the integrity of the building and it's Warren Street frontage. Put it in the budget. With all the new high taxes, and perhaps a good grant writer the City can surely squeeze $4M. I hope the next Mayor will consider saving money by not buying JLE.
ReplyDeleteJLE should belong to the taxpayers - we paid to build the thing - we shouldnt be forced to buy it back !
ReplyDeleteThis expensive plan will always feel like a renovation of a former structure. All it does is preserve the facade. Internally it will never have the feel of a stately civic building. The intern floor plan is a tortured design disaster.
ReplyDeleteWhy does Hudson need a city hall at all? It seems every function there can be out sourced. Think outside the building! A good storefront can become the mayors office and put him/her more in touch with the people. Otherwise,the least expensive scheme makes the most sense.
ReplyDelete