Saturday, July 12, 2025

When What You See Is Not What You Get

The City's largest and most costly DRI (Downtown Revitalization Initiative) project--once known as "Hudson Connects" but now being called "Hudson Streetscapes"--is just winding up, and it doesn't seem to be having the transformative impact many thought it might. A couple of weeks ago, Gossips reported that the project, as originally proposed, turned out to cost $6.6 million when it got to the bidding process, and it had to be scaled back to fit the budget the City had for it--a mere $3 million: "Hudson Connects--The Vision and the Reality." How the decisions were made about what was to be eliminated or who made those decisions is not known. We do know that it was not a public process.

One thing that made the renderings of the plan appealing to many was the inclusion of perennials in the beds that line the sidewalks and fill the bump-outs.   


It seems, however, the care and keeping of those plantings was never considered or assigned. This was the state of a couple of beds on Front Street yesterday. 

Photo: Sarah Sterling
Photo: Sarah Sterling
The reader who provided these photographs, an accomplished gardener, predicted that if the plants did not get watered soon, they would die. Mercifully, weather reports indicate a possibility of rain this afternoon.

Another thing we were promised by the renderings was trees, but it seems not all the trees promised were planted. 

To make way for the bump-out and the new sidewalks at the intersection of Warren and Second streets, two ginkgo trees were removed on the west side of South Second Street. 


The owner of the adjacent building was promised the trees would be replaced. The rendering of that intersection actually shows a tree planted in the bump-out.


Sadly, no tree has been planted to replace the two trees lost, and the space available for planting is not big enough to accommodate a tree. In fact, two trees were planted in front of 201 Warren Street, because this space on Second Street was deemed too small for a tree. 

Photo: Kim Bach

It is interesting to recall the original goals of the "Hudson Connects" project:
GOAL #1: MAKE STREETS SAFE & ACCESSIBLE FOR ALL  The streets should be developed as a multi-modal network that provides a safe and enjoyable experience for all users regardless of age or ability.
GOAL #2: RECONNECT THE WATERFRONT  The streets should enhance and reinforce visual and physical connections to the waterfront.
GOAL #3: CELEBRATE THE HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE OF HUDSON  The form, furniture and materiality of the streetscape should respect and reinforce the historic architecture and urban fabric of the city.
Goal 1 is probably the most important one and may be the only one that comes close to being met by the finished product.
COPYRIGHT 2025 CAROLE OSTERINK

12 comments:

  1. The mayor lied?! I’m shocked. Shocked.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Those plants are going to get curb stomped by people parking at the Terrace and people who double park at the bodegas. Let’s check back in a month or so.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A feature that was in the presentation, bike lanes, never made it past the promise stage. What a shame.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There never was, and there never will be, room for bike lanes. Not on Warren nor on Front. Not as long as parking is allowed.

      Delete
  4. What we got is merely a reflection of the dysfunction at City Hall. Soon it will be an ugly and more dangerous mess because no one will know who is responsible for maintaining anything we have been given.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Open-bed tree guards are going to be needed. Otherwise dogs and people could ruin the beds, and certainly snow removal too.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very disappointed in what Hudson actually got.
    I see very little that is improvement over what was replaced and much that will become pure crap.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Is Front Street Hudson's Boulevard of Broken Dreams?

    Relatedly the "bulb-out" or "curb extension" at intersections are great in theory... at least in Europe... but perhaps not in Hudson.

    On the corner of Warren and 2nd street there are often long traffic james as local residents idle in front of the Warren Street Market corner. That corner also has more pedestrians.

    Who is in charge of solving that? The mayor? DPW? HPD?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The scourge of double parking, which seems to be a popular pastime of bodega/deli patrons, has only been exacerbated by the bulb-outs as they now block the entire travel lane.

      As far as should be in charge of solving that, I would assume HPD since this involves enforcement of the city’s parking rules as well as NY Vehicle Traffic Law. I would assume that if it was up to the mayor there would be no enforcement, as he has made clear with past due parking finesor property taxes—enforcement is mean and unfair. When in reality non-enforcement, and especially selective enforcement, is anything but fair to a the majority of Hudsonians who follow the law or struggle to pay their taxes.

      Delete
    2. try punching up, “neighbor” — last I checked it was Tourists in G wagons double parked on warren, in front of hydrant at la perche, doing 7 point u-turns on warren at 3PM on a friday, going north of 40mph down union to make train, driving the wrong way on one ways, or crawling 5mph up street to shop from car which might qualify for an anon lament by someone who clearly doesn't live downtown.

      Delete
    3. Sure, why not both? I can punch both ways. I do find that a lot of the bad behavior exhibited by tourists, both on foot and behind the wheel is due to our poor traffic infrastructure: dimly lit and mismatched traffic signals, lack of pedestrian signals, decaying signage, no center line markings… And due to the assumption of said tourists, especially from more densely populated urban environments, that we’re a quaint slow-paced village where it doesn’t matter how you drive or where/when you cross a street.

      I mainly walk everywhere since I do indeed live “downtown,” mainly in the alleys so I can avoid such vehicular buffoonery from both locals and visitors alike.

      I do enjoy your passive aggressive sniping and I find it endearing. Especially when you use big words that stimulate my vocabulary chops. As an “anon” it’s only fair, so keep up the good work.

      Delete
  8. As someone who frequently cycles Warren with my 10 year old, it's a shame cycling infrastructure wasn't included. Although the separated path seems unlikely with parking on both sides of the street, having more awareness and consideration for cyclists on the road would have been a great improvement.

    ReplyDelete