Image: South Bay Coaltion |
Stiffler also noted, speaking of comments received from the public, that "people are of the opinion that traffic and activity at the dock would increase" with the proposed haul road. Prendergast alleged, as he has before, that "the whole project is about getting the trucks off city streets." The question was raised if Colarusso's mining permit imposed limitations on the intensification of mining activity, and it was indicated that it did. JR Heffner, vice president of operations for Colarusso, noted that mining permits had to be renewed every five years.
COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK
If the idea is to get the Colarusso trucks off Columbia St., then why is the company insisting that it retain the right to use that route in addition to the new haul road?
ReplyDeleteIt was odd to hear Mr. Prendergast claim that no damage to the causeway was incurred as a result of Hurricane Sandy.
ReplyDeleteEverybody knows the damage was extensive, but last night the engineer would only repeat that "the water went up and down exactly as it did on Route 9-G."
Not true!
Fortunately, people took extensive photographs of Sandy's damage to the gravel road, and of the damage caused by Hurricane Irene too.
I believe that last night marked the first time in a decade or more that Mr. Prendergast said the word "culvert" in public. Before now, no owner of the South Bay wanted to acknowledge the culverts' existence aloud.
Earlier this year, in the revised Site Plan, the culverts were quietly acknowledged for the first time ever. Appearing as a small line segment somewhere on gigantic plan, and labeled only "culvert" (singular), no mention of the sly revision appeared in the Site Plan's revision section.
This unprofessional conduct suggested a reluctance concerning the culverts, but now after 80-odd years of service it seems the culverts exist after all.
Will the wonders never cease ...