Mill Street Lofts is on the agenda for tomorrow night's Planning Board meeting. The word is the Planning Board will be closing the public hearing on the project at tomorrow night's meeting and starting the clock on reaching a decision about site plan approval.
This morning, three members of the Common Council--Rich Volo (Fourth Ward), Jennifer Belton (Fourth Ward), and Margaret Morris (First Ward)--submitted the following resolution to be added to the agenda for tonight's informal Common Council meeting.
RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE MILL STREET LOFTS HOUSING PROJECT
WHEREAS The Mill Street Lofts project is in a flood plain with insufficient drainage and will increase flooding risk for existing homes on Mill Street; and
WHEREAS The Mill Street Lofts project does not offer its residents at least one parking space per unit, which will cause an overflow of on-street parking, making access for emergency vehicles and the Empire State Trail more difficult; and
WHEREAS The Mill Street Lofts project is located on land originally deeded for park and recreation, and
WHEREAS The Mill Street Lofts project is located on the habitat of a Threatened bat species; and
WHEREAS The Mill Street Lofts project does not fit the character of the other houses on Mill Street; and
WHEREAS The Mill Street Lofts project concentrates low-income housing within a few blocks of the City of Hudson which is not recommended by the City of Hudson’s approved 2018 Strategic Housing Action Plan prepared by the Hudson Valley Pattern for Progress; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Common Council hereby disapproves of the construction of The Mill Street Lofts project.
According to the Common Council Rules of Order, adopted by the Common Council at its organizational meeting in January 2025, proposed resolutions and laws can be put before the full Council for consideration if they are presented by three councilmembers. The following is Rule #4 Local Laws and Resolutions:
All Resolutions and Laws shall be submitted in writing at the Informal Session for discussion before submission to the Formal Session. This rule may be waived by the President of the Council when deemed necessary. Any matter, motion, proposed resolution or law introduced at the Informal or Formal Session, the President, at his sole discretion, may assign it to the appropriate ad hoc Committee(s), or place it on the Agenda for consideration by the Council. A petition by three members of the Council to the full Council will be sufficient to discharge a draft law or resolution and bring it up for consideration by the Council.
Despite this rule, when Volo, Belton, and Morris submitted the resolution this morning to Council president Tom DePietro for inclusion in the agenda for tonight's meeting, he refused to add it to the agenda, giving three reasons: it was due on Friday; it is full of misinformation; and it is a matter before the Planning Board and the Common Council should not opine on such matters.
Although the resolution is not on the agenda for tonight's meeting, it is very likely Mill Street Lofts will be a topic of discussion. The meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. Click here for the link to join the meeting remotely.
Of related interest, mayoral candidate Peter Spear explains his opposition to Mill Street Lofts on Instagram today. Click here to listen to that statement.
COPYRIGHT 2025 CAROLE OSTERINK
Why is Tom still sitting on a throne?
ReplyDeleteMaybe if he climbed down from his mock royal perch and tried leading like an American, he might finaly dislodge the ceremonial scepter from his sphi... um... posterior, and let the grown ups have a proper debate.
Seriously... this is not Congress or Westminster... it is a town with barely 5000 people and 3 or more of our elected leaders want to debate a perfectly reasonable point that is timely.
Tom - he who gives SuperPAC employed "For the Many" Poughkeepsie residents speaker slots but not locally elected common council members.
π️ Jack Hornickel (a lawyer and tax paying resident) laid out the facts plainly.
ReplyDeleteπ₯ Tom again tried to interrupt and said from the throne/mic "you are wrong". Jack, very politely and without interrupting anyone, plainly explained the facts and cited from memory legal precedent and case law. (Separately, imagine if Jack was the City's lawyer, so calm and reasonable, though I would not wish that on him)
π€Ί And it was clear to the entire room that the Planning Board says some of these issues are Common Council issues. And the Common Council says some of these issues are Planning Board issues.
Theresa deflects to Tom and Tom deflects to Theresa. (It is like the Spiderman meme)
Unpaid residents have to spend time pointing out these flaws.
π Meanwhile Faith, another tax payer and resident, politely pointed out (to applause) that the City does not seem very well organized right now and there are several citizen initiatives afoot to fix the mess, and recent events where the City sold land and soon regretted it. (11 Warren Street?)
~
⌛️ Kamal is desperate to get a housing win at all costs... now that 6 years later he has delivered so little... and his allies are bailing... that he is trying to ride roughshod over NYS laws in a way that will not survive a legal challenge. He even posted a rallying cry on FB _during_ the Common Council meeting to his allies to attend the Planning Board meeting on Tuesday. (Imagine if he was this organized about drumming up business growth in Hudson to create good jobs or organizing Winter Walk).
~
So much wasted time... wasted tax dollars... and Margaret and Trixie and Jenny warned everyone almost a year ago.
π¨⚖️ Oh... and Tom did behave like Westminster backbencher without the toff accent, as predicted, regrettably, and made some completely unnecessary and uncalled for remark about hearing aids, aimed at his political opponent.
π΅ The funniest moment that would have made it onto C-Span if this were, like Tom / Kamal / Claire / Quintin wishes, a larger stage that mattered beyond Mill Street and our local property taxes... is Quintin admitting that he uses the Signal App* to communicate with the national board of BLM, or so he alleges.
This was in response to Council Member Vicky asking a perfectly legitimate question, in a perfectly calm temperament, to the For the Many SuperPAC-y organizers from Poughkeepsie (Tom knew their first names, even the new non-resident) about their Tides Foundation funding, and the related BLM funding scandal and litigation:
https://www.philanthropy.com/article/why-tides-and-black-lives-matter-are-fighting-over-33-million
πͺ So there we have it... the flood zone in Mill Street brings together BLM, Tides (Soros backed), Kamal's last hope for housing, Quintin Cross, NY Preservationists / Global Warming related flooding, the failing Hudson City School District and their weird non arms length sale (?) of the protected land, HCHC, Habitat for Humanity, nearby eminent domain issues... oh and the Spark of Hudson (who wants to build a $2m pickle ball and outdoor bathroom there unless plans changed?)
The only entity/people missing from this mess is Galvan / Rick Scalera, or ICE arresting someone from the "Sanctuary" movement on the softball field while designing an ADU. But there is still time...
❓ Is Mill Street’s flood zone and dead-end road the Jeffrey Epstein island flight log of Hudson?**
* Signal (the privacy first end-to-end encryption app famously used by Jan 6th participants, Missouri Gov Eric Greitens, LA City Hall corruption with Jose Huizar, and most recently Pete Hegseth when he and Waltz used the emojis "π πΊπΈ π₯" to refer to the bombing of Houthis. aka Signalgate)
** Dense, compromised network of conflicting, high-profile interests
It was difficult for those of us listening at home (no video last night- technology in the City is nonexistent since Michael Hoffman left City Hall), but it sounded as though the council was asking legal questions regarding pending legislation at the State level of a non-lawyer, campaign director (of what I couldn’t hear)? While the Council’s attorney was present? Please tell me I missed something.
DeleteI didn’t get through the entire meeting, but Rob Perry was the highlight for me. He was succinct and witty. We should all listen to his reporting, though. It sounds like we need expensive upgrades to our sewer treatment plant. With an administration that doesn’t seem to grasp accounting and budgeting principals, the need for city management deepens.
Why hasn’t the meeting been posted to YouTube? Was it too embarrassing to share?
ReplyDeleteTimestamp for Jack Hornickel overview of Mill Street Flood Zone / Housing Issue and legal considerations @ 2:15: https://youtu.be/gyAaUe31eps?si=tkDBR2uToxGMyH2k&t=8110
DeleteTimestamp for Quintin Cross overview of Mill Street Flood Zone / Housing Issue and historical and unrelated considerations at 2:25 https://youtu.be/gyAaUe31eps?si=u_925v1pJtBX2hDb&t=8725
What a circus of a meeting. So much time and distraction from the actual pressing matters of the city.
Delete