This afternoon, Ray Jurkowski, Commissioner of Public Works for Columbia County, and the team from LaBella presented three options for improvements to the facade at 11 Warren Street, soon be home to the Board of Elections, the Probation Department, the Public Defender's Office, and the Conflict Defender's Office. The three options presented are shown below, in order, from least expensive to most expensive, as if that clarification were needed.
Sadly, the options range from strip mall to economy motel to something that resembles a Stewart's. None of the proposed designs is, by any stretch of the imagination, compatible with the historic district in which the building is located. The idioms "lipstick on a pig" and "silk purse from a sow's ear" spring to mind.
Gossips was present for the first forty-five minutes of this evening's public input workshop session. After being put off once and almost dismissed a second time, I persisted to ask Jurkowski this question: Will the proposed "facade improvements" be presented to the Historic Preservation Commission for a certificate of appropriateness? Although 11 Warren Street is notably not a historic building, it is located in a locally designated historic district, and hence its alterations should go before the HPC. Jurkowski responded by saying they were soliciting public input, and members of the HPC were welcome to offer their comments. He also maintained that county projects were exempt from Hudson's laws and regulations.
In response, I pointed out that his predecessor, David Robinson, presented the plans for the expansion and renovation of the Columbia County courthouse not only to the HPC but also to the Planning Board, and I suggested that, given the controversy surrounding this project, he might show the same courtesy. I went on to express the opinion that having people indicate with sticky notes what they liked and disliked about the options presented would not result in a good outcome. I did not, although I might have, cite the adage that a camel is a horse designed by a committee. Jurkowski told me I could share my opinions in the survey.
The survey in question was available in print form to be filled out on the spot. There was also a QR code for the survey provided on a poster displayed at this evening's event.
The survey can also be accessed here. Readers are urged to use the survey to share their thoughts.
Just as a reminder, this is what the first block of Warren Street looked like at some point in the late 19th or early 20th century, before most the block was demolished in the zeal of Urban Renewal.






Ever find yourself wishing an arsonist was available? Me too.
ReplyDeleteThere is little hope of improving this sad building with “lipstick”. It would be better to take the facade improvement money and apply it to the landscaping budget. A screen or arbor vitae or similar trees and vine covered trellises would help a great deal. Ivy on the alley and second street walls would also help.
ReplyDeleteLa Bella is a landscape firm as well as an engineering firm- they should know what to do to preserve he paring but “lose” the building.
Walter is absolutely right: don't "improve" the building; hide it!
ReplyDeleteThey should take a clue from downtowm Kingston with the covered sidewalks that hints back to old photos of Hudson.
ReplyDeleteKingston wisely removed the canopies from those sidewalks. If only removing this building were as simple.
DeleteLooks like shit. 👍🏼 Gossips deserves all the praise for pushing back on Jurkowski's equivocation.
ReplyDelete"Unless a statute exempts it, an encroaching governmental unit is presumed to be subject to the zoning regulations of a host community when the encroacher seeks to develop within the geographic
ReplyDeleteboundaries of the host. "
https://dos.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2026/02/governmental-immunity-lu14.pdf