Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Debating the Moratorium

Before the Council went into executive session to receive and discuss the police contract, the major topic of discussion at Monday's informal Council meeting was Mayor Rick Rector's veto of the proposed moratorium on registering and operating new short-term rental units, now being referred to as STRs. Reading a prepared statement in response to the mayor's veto message, Council president Tom DePietro asserted that the nine-month moratorium could be lifted at any time, it is nowhere suggested that the moratorium would address the affordable housing shortage, and the moratorium would discourage "predatory investment" in Hudson.

Screen capture: Dan Udell
When DePietro had concluded his statement, Alderman John Rosenthal (Fourth Ward), chair of the Legal Committee, who initiated the legislation in September, took up the defense of the moratorium. He alleged that "defining 'owner occupied' is not a simple thing," alluded to Alderman Rich Volo's blog post on the subject by saying the action was "very far from being knee jerk," called the veto an "unfortunate gesture by the mayor," and contended, as he has before, that the moratorium "will help us craft an appropriate law." He characterized opponents of the moratorium as "a small amount of people who have a self-interest" and urged his colleagues to overturn the veto.

Volo reminded the Council that the 2020 city budget anticipated an increase in revenue from the lodging tax. DePietro responded by saying "numerous people have applied [for lodging tax registration] knowing this moratorium is going into effect." Gossips sought confirmation of this claim from the city treasurer's office and was told there have been thirty new registrants for filing the lodging tax since September.

Amanda Purcell published her report about the moratorium on Hudson360 yesterday: "Hudson Common Council plans vote to override veto on short-term rental moratorium." Dan Udell's video of the meeting can be viewed here.
COPYRIGHT 2019 CAROLE OSTERINK

2 comments:

  1. I can't imagine any other business that would be subject to a moratorium for the declared purpose to study if it is a problem or not. You would think before placing a moratorium that may restrain the only growing business sector in Hudson, (the tourist business) there would be some kind of a study and proofs presented in advance. There is no proof that restricting B&Bs would have any impact whatsoever on the rental housing market in Hudson. So tell us, what is the real motivation behind this proposal? Why is this being pushed with such urgency and emotion? It seems there are some who are unhappy with the improvements that have been made to Hudson and long for the good old days of low rents, rats, roaches and rotting wood.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In the City of Hudson over 80% of Airbnb rentals are entire residence. There are over 250 listings, 30% of which for >6 adults. It is no doubt proportionally - without any zoning, permitting, or planning - a magnificent force that is shaping this city in its image.

      New Orleans, Asheville, Santa Monica, Charleston, Amsterdam and San Francisco have all banned entire house Airbnb listings.

      Critically, a moratorium that we may better understand short-term rentals in our City, this takes no imagination at all.

      Delete