Saturday, January 4, 2020

The Struggle Elsewhere

At the end of 2019, Mayor Rick Rector vetoed the proposed nine-month moratorium on the creation of new short-term rentals, and the Common Council upheld the veto by a very slim margin. Because two of the four aldermen who voted against overriding the mayor's veto are no longer on the Council, it is expected that the moratorium will be presented again this year, with no danger of it being vetoed by the new mayor, Kamal Johnson, who told WAMC back in July that he felt compelled to run in 2019 because, "There's an epidemic of short-term rentals" in Hudson.

The principal argument for the moratorium voiced repeatedly by Alderman John Rosenthal (Fourth Ward), who introduced the moratorium in September without the customary vetting by the Legal Committee, which he chaired, is that it will give the Council "the opportunity to look at other communities" and draft appropriate legislation to regulate short term rentals in Hudson. 

One of the "other communities" mentioned from time to time in discussion about the draft legislation is the Village of Rhinebeck. Rhinebeck recently adopted legislation to regulate short-term rentals, and on Thursday, Joel Craig of Hudson Valley Life Style & Real Estate released a video commenting on Rhinebeck's new law: "Rhinebeck Bans Airbnb!" 

The video can be viewed here. A red-lined version of the legislation before it was enacted can be viewed here. 

Thanks to Cynthia Lambert for bringing this video to our attention.
COPYRIGHT 2020 CAROLE OSTERINK

3 comments:

  1. Another nail in the coffin for the city's dwindling middle class. Making more room for the filthy rich and dirt poor.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A moratorium sends the message that visitors are not welcome here in Hudson. If they conduct a study I hope they take into account how much a moratorium will hurt small businesses, I predict it may put some out of business altogether. We will have available apartments for rent and vacant storefronts on Warren.

    ReplyDelete
  3. No sooner do I begin paying an additional $500/mo for the privilege of being gentrified when city tax wizards want to further restrict the property being taxed.

    More tax, less use and fewer users.

    ReplyDelete