At today's meeting of the Hudson IDA (Industrial Development Agency), Dan Kent, vice president of initiatives for the Galvan Foundation, announced a change to the building proposed for 708 State Street. Originally described market rate apartments, the building is now being called "workforce housing," affordable to households with moderate and middle incomes. The changes, Kent explained, were made as a result of conversations with Tiffany Garriga and Rebecca Wolff, majority leader and minority leader respectively of the Common Council, both members of the IDA.
Kent told the IDA that 20 percent of the apartments at 708 State Street would now be affordable to households earning 80 percent of AMI (area median income) and rents would be capped at 130 percent of AMI for the rest of the apartments. He also outlined the beginning rents for the building:
Moderate Income (80 percent of AMI)
- One bedroom $1,120
- Two bedroom $1,360
- Three bedroom $1,560
Middle Income (not more than 130 percent of AMI)
- One bedroom $1,350
- Two bedroom $1,525
- Three bedroom $1,725
When asked about the rents in the the building across the street--75 North Seventh Street--which has always been described as affordable housing, Dan Hubbell, attorney for Galvan, shared the following chart:
Mike Tucker reported that a financial consultant who is the former executive director of the New York City IDA will be engaged to review the projects. Chris Chale, legal counsel to the IDA, suggested that a public hearing take place sometime in June. The IDA agreed to have a special meeting on Tuesday, May 18, at which time Galvan is expected to present its application with all the modifications that have been made since the application was initially submitted, and a public hearing on the project will be scheduled.
COPYRIGHT 2021 CAROLE OSTERINK
How does a project of this magnitude get so far along and involve so many agencies and departments WHEN THERE IS CLEARLY NOT ADEQUATE PARKING FOR THE ADDITIONAL CARS IT WILL ADD TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD? IT'S NOT EVEN CLOSE. It happens when people like Tiffany Garriga, with her infinite wisdom and venerable leadership skills, says "we need this project. Worry about the parking later." It's all kind of frightening how things operate in Hudson (soon to be Galvanville). Rank amateurs making decisions that will affect Hudson for years and just maybe ruin Hudson. Bill Huston
ReplyDeleteBill,
DeleteI don't think Tiffany is acting the amateur. The City of Hudson through Local Law 2 of 2019 made it official City policy not to require off-street parking. I understand your consternation and concern, and potentially, the City did not perform comprehensive planning to ensure that future development would be consistent with that Policy, but I think Tiffany and her colleagues are visioning a future for Hudson that isn't car-dependent in the way it is today, and as an urbanist, I can't help but agree. Requiring surface parking a) isn't a particularly socially positive use; and b) ends up inflating the price of housing. Since the city is trying to promote affordable housing here the policy seems to make sense. The vision of Hudson as a dense, walkable, urban community just doesn't seem to be one you can believe in.
Bill:
Deletea dense urban community without cars in a 2 square mile radius does not seem practical, unless the residents are remote workers who order their groceries online. If this is the vision, where are these low to middle income families going to find employment? There are not jobs within Hudson to support 150 families. If they plan shop for groceries, they will need cars. If they are working outside Hudson, they will need cars. Sad but true.
my post should have been addressed to Matthew, not Bill.
DeleteSeems to me if the people of Hudson want to convert their small, quiet, developing tour-glam city of 2-3 story historic buildings into a dense urban community that's their choice, but it really should be a choice of the people, based on referendum, not the choice of a few council persons who may long for a more urban setting. What is being proposed is not a small project, but an intentionally transformative, large scale project that will set the stage for additional developments of a similar character. Do you want to preserve the scale and ambiance of the city, the very things that made it attractive, or intentionally change it's character? If someone really wants to live in a dense urban environment there are other options, Albany, Newburg, the Bronx, Newark, Baltimore, Detroit, plenty of places with lower rent and urban density.
DeleteShould not the residents of Hudson have a say on whether they want to urbanize Hudson or retain it's character? The Council does have a tendency to act on the pressure of small groups of political activists, many who do not even live in Hudson, who make proposals, petitions and organize vocal mobs to storm meetings. They also are individuals who have personal issues and agendas that do not necessarily represent the interests, welfare, or the will of the majority.
I agree with P. Winslow and M. Morris. I would add that presumably this is the will of Hudson residents given these officials are elected, or duly appointed by electeds.
DeleteMatthew - How does not having a parking lot for over 150 cars make Hudson less car dependent? You and others are conflating issues. People buy cars because they need them, wherever they have to park. When 150 new drivers are competing for spaces with me and all my car-owning neighbors, things will get real ugly real fast. Parking is fairly tight around here already. The proposed development, while maybe necessary, is far too large for the neighborhood. This is obvious. B Huston
DeleteMatthew:
Deletebeg to disagree re this being the will of Hudson residents. I frequently write to the CC, the Mayor and my representatives on the CC regarding my positions on various city issues. Only one ward rep ever responds. My experience is that that our "representatives" do not seek input from constituents. Once elected -- frequently unopposed and by a small percentage of their wards -- they see themselves as unaccountable and do not make any attempt to find out what their constituents want.
“Workforce housing”. Hmmm. I think that we all deserve to hear a clear definition of what that means exactly.
ReplyDeleteWorkforce Housing ? for what jobs ? there are none in Columbia County and there wont be soon.
ReplyDeleteWorker Housing is reminiscent of the Communist block countries that parroted the concept but never provided any work. Sounds good -- isnt needed.
Another huge social experiment in making Hudson the next South Bronx !! Can we keep it a small town ?
If it's at all helpful, Holst and j kay, I think in the language of income-based housing, the categories of "moderate income" and "middle income" are classified as "workforce." The income categories are determined by percentage of AMI (area median income).
DeleteThree bedroom apartments for families with kids. PILOTS so no school taxes are paid. Math is fun!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteYou’re right, “some taxes paid”
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis is deja vu all over again, except larger. Their last proposal was withdrawn because no agreement could be reached re the PILOT. Now they have changed the market value proposal to workforce in order to strengthen their case for a PILOT.
ReplyDeleteAnother raw sewage dump. DEP should really look into this and there should be an environmental impact study before any new apartment buildings are constructed.
ReplyDeleteNew York Sewage Pollution Right to Know
UPDATE
Issued: 05-05-2021, 13:37:37
Affects: New York - Columbia - Hudson
The Hudson (C) STP, NY0022039 is issuing this notification.
Discharge location: 2 Dock street, Hudson, NY
Location details:
Waterbody affected: Hudson River
Discharge description:
Potentially impacted public areas: Other -
Discharge date and time: 05-04-2021 00:49:55
Discharge duration: 03:54:21 Hours
Discharge reason: Weather Conditions - Rain event caused high flow to system. CSO’s will discharge intermittently throughout duration of event.
Steps taken to contain discharge: Ensure all pumps are running to full capacity
Volume/rate of discharge: 490,000 Gallons Actual
Treated state of discharge: Partially Treated with Disinfection
Additional information:
For more information on the Sewage Pollution Right to Know Act visit SPRTK.
The bottom line is that Galvan is dedicated to using its neighbors' tax dollars instead of its own and proves it by changing State Street to AMI-indexed only leases to justify its quest for yet another PILOT. It wants its neighbors to pay its profits and it's unconscionable. Rather than dedicate themselves to actual sustainable housing, it will only "invest" if it can get a PILOT. Clearly the industry of poverty at work.
ReplyDeleteAre there any amenities for this project beside a new bar. What do all those kids do in the evenings. Is there a play ground or tennis courts, a pool? The lack of parking is intellectually insulting. I've refereed to this project as a slum in waiting before ... convince me otherwise.
ReplyDeleteAnother raw sewage dump, this time 1.47 million gallons.
ReplyDeleteUPDATE
Issued: 05-06-2021, 09:15:45
Affects: New York - Columbia - Hudson
The Hudson (C) STP, NY0022039 is issuing this notification.
Discharge location: 2 Dock Street, Hudson, NY
Location details:
Waterbody affected: Hudson RIver
Discharge description:
Potentially impacted public areas: Other -
Discharge date and time: 05-05-2021 00:00:01
Discharge duration: 10:05:20 Hours
Discharge reason: Weather Conditions - Rain event caused high flows to system. CSO's will discharge intermittently throughout duration of event.
Steps taken to contain discharge: Ensure all pumps are running to capacity.
Volume/rate of discharge: 1,470,000 Gallons Actual
Treated state of discharge: Partially Treated with Disinfection
Additional information:
For more information on the Sewage Pollution Right to Know Act visit SPRTK.
[Disclaimer: Daily and/or termination reports will be provided for ongoing discharges. Wet weather CSO do not need to report daily nor provide a termination report. The information provided in this message is accurate at the time of report using existing systems and models.]
NY-Alert Support - NYAlertSupport@its.ny.gov
www.Alert.ny.gov
Yes to all these comments! The woeful lack of adequate parking PLUS the sewage issues which this project would create are truly a disaster in the making !
ReplyDelete