Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Mill Street Neighborhood Responds

Last week, it was revealed that, unbeknownst to the Common Council and to the public in general, Mayor Joseph Ferris amended the terms of the agreement to sell two City-owned parcels to Kearney Realty & Development Group. According to the original agreement, the closing needed to take place on or before May 3, 2026. The amendment to the agreement, signed on May 20, 2026, changes the date of closing from a fixed date to an open-ended one: "thirty (30) days after the Seller has discontinued all pending actions/proceedings relating to the ability of the Seller to convey title to the Property."

As soon as the information about the amendment went public at the Common Council meeting last Tuesday, Ferris issued a statement explaining why this action was taken. Gossips has published that statement twice, here and here


Today, the residents of Mill Street issued their own statement, responding to Ferris. The statement, which was published on the Mill Street Neighborhood website, is reproduced below.
Late last week, Mayor Ferris gave a statement explaining his decision to extend the City’s contract with the Kearney Group. Our neighborhood would like to respond to falsehoods in his statement and set a few facts straight about our litigation. 
As a reminder, the Mill Street Lofts is a proposed apartment complex six times the size of our entire neighborhood. It would be built on public parkland, in violation of state law, on a parcel that regularly and severely floods. Those are only the headlines in a long list of design failures that our neighbors pointed out to the Planning Board and the Common Council for over a year. Both boards chose to ignore the red flags in order to push the project through at then-Mayor Kamal’s urging. The process was so clearly stacked that three of our own city representatives encouraged us to file a lawsuit. Mr. Ferris gave a written statement of support as we prepared to file the suit, joined us for a neighborhood organizing meeting, and publicly stated his opposition to the project on his campaign trail
But in his public statement last week, Mr. Ferris shows that not only has he reversed his opposition to the project, he is willing to collaborate with the developer behind closed doors and lie about it. 
Mr. Ferris’s statement includes the following falsehoods: 
“[I am] doing everything in my power to avoid unnecessary and expensive legal actions whose cost will be borne by the taxpayers.” 
“The contract closing date was not extended.” 
“The City of Hudson cannot unilaterally cancel the contract.” 
“Much of this was discussed at a March 6 meeting attended by myself, Council President Morris, Mill Street petitioners, and the respective legal representatives.” 
Let’s start with the Mayor’s statement about March 6th. On that date, our neighborhood enthusiastically offered to cooperate with the newly elected administration on settling the case, explicitly to stop wasting city funds. We asked that the new mayor recognize the 40 pages of municipal documents acknowledging the parcel as parkland, so as not to waste taxpayer dollars waiting for a judge to recognize what the city record already plainly shows. In that same meeting, we had our attorney explain that the City can choose to exit their contract with the Kearney group at any time, without penalty, and that city governments are very rarely held liable for doing so. 
The Mayor said all of two sentences in that meeting, namely, “I’m Joe Ferris the Mayor and I’m just here to listen,” and “Thank you everyone for your time.” It is a complete fabrication that anyone--our neighborhood, or Council President Morris--were clued in on the Mayor’s actual intention to singlehandedly extend the developer’s contract once it expired. No other strategies to resolve the case were offered. No one from City government responded to our settlement offer in any way. 
That alone should clarify that the Mayor is not “avoiding unnecessary and expensive legal actions.” In fact, the City’s next move after our meeting was to pursue an unnecessary additional legal step, a Motion to Dismiss, that delayed the judge’s ruling by months. This wasteful attempt to throw out our case was rejected by the judge on every point. (You can read the judge’s opinion here). 
When Mayor Ferris says, “the contract closing date was not extended,” is Mayor Ferris playing word games, or does he not understand the impact of the document he signed? The contract had a clear closing date (May 3rd, 2026), after which the City administration could exit or declare a default. Instead, he collaborated with the developer on an amendment that has no predictable end date at all. 
But the amendment does more damage than keeping the Mill Street Lofts project on lifeline. Mayor Ferris bargained away the City’s leverage over its real estate in exchange for nothing. The extension ignores that the Kearney Group completely abandoned work on the State Street apartments and Rossman Avenue townhouses that are bound up in the same contract and promised in their original proposal. He signed the amendment without any public process and kept it out of the public record until Council President Morris formally requested it 6 weeks later. When Carla Sadoff, candidate for 4th Ward supervisor, asked if he had amended the contract at his town hall on May 18th, he dodged the question and feigned ignorance. All this from the Mayor that ran on government transparency and accountability! 
There is one sentence in the Mayor’s statement that does ring true, and that is, “it was necessary to execute the amendment to maintain the status quo.” For over a year, the City has been indefinitely bound to an underperforming developer with a terrible plan for our neighborhood, with the City and the neighborhood footing legal bills while we wait for a judge to explain the obvious. Mayor Ferris is 100% correct that he took the action that would be most likely to maintain that status quo. 
Mayor Ferris: This is not what you were elected for. Your obligations are to your constituents and to legal process, not to protect the interests of an outside developer. We demand that you honor your campaign promises to our neighborhood to extract the City from this deeply flawed project, and terminate or relocate the Mill Street Lofts deal.

17 comments:

  1. It's what you do when (you think) no one is watching that reveals your true self.

    Unfortunately, for elected officials, official acts tend to have to be made public to be, well, official.

    Kudos to the Mill Street plaintiffs for calling out the mayor's hypocrisy. It may also prove to quiet all that seditious talk about the mayor only using his current office to run for Assembly next go-round: who would run for higher office on a record of directly lying to his constituents? Oh. Yeah. Nevermind.

    Happy 4th of July, Hudson!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “Say it ain’t so, Joe”



      Reference:
      During the 1919 Black Sox scandal, a boy supposedly pleaded on the street;

      “Say it ain’t so, Joe”

      to Shoeless Joe Jackson after the Chicago White Sox threw the World Series.

      Jackson denied the exchange ever happened (of course), which only deepened the legend.

      Apparently it became shorthand in America for a trusted figure caught in betrayal, a hero who sold out.

      Hudson Common Sense editors heard about the saying at Fenway, long before we even understood the game.

      Now, the real game is afoot.

      Delete
    2. Turns out there is a song;

      “Say it Ain’t So, Joe”

      By Murray Head

      https://open.spotify.com/track/6vJZnE3jJWfxOIVONjntUO?si=0cu50V3ZT9uewdeLA3raXA

      A song about fallen heroes;

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Say_It_Ain't_So,_Joe_(song)?wprov=sfti1#



      Delete
    3. I am hopeful it ain't so...please Mayor Joe - if a mistake has been made, own it.

      Delete
  2. For me, the big red flag about Ferris during his campaign to be our mayor was the fact that he had lived here for over a year (two?) and never once attended an informal common council meeting, neither in person or on line. He owned a house and needed a job, so he bought himself one. He might be a phony, maybe even on par with Kamal. He hired an aide who was miserable as a former mayor and who decided two years was more than enough time to spend at 520 Warren Street dealing with department heads and not being able to accomplish anything worthwhile. When Tiffany Martin left City Hall several years ago, was the first thought in her mind how soon she hoped to return? I doubt it.

    No more mayors! No more mayor's aides! No more amateur bullshit -- we get enough of that from council members! We need a professional manager or the city is doomed!
    Ferris held a meet n greet at his house during his campaign, taking questions from attendees. I asked him if he was in support of City Hall hiring a city manager. He said he was not at all for it, offering two or three reasons why. The continuing story of the Mill Street fiasco proves Ferris is no manager at all. I guess he's a mayor, but what does that even mean these days besides being elected only by spending a shit ton of money? Being elected to do what? Hold endless "town halls," make empty promises about "improving ten intersections for pedestrians," and talk to developers behind closed doors just like Kamal Johnson loved to do?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ferris has been a huge disappoinment for many reasons. We got sold a pig in a poke.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wonder who wrote the Mill Street statement. It's very hard hitting and effective. I'd like to think it was a resident and not a hired spokesperson.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was a Mill Street resident, likely the same one you can hear so eloquently addressing the council at the most recent informal (regular?) meeting whose video is on YouTube via the city website. It's worth listening to, and it wasn't his first appearance in front of the council. It's not often that people show up to meetings who speak so well and have done their homework.

      Delete
    2. That would be Jack. He is also an attorney and committed to ALL of the MIll Street residents, not just his family

      Delete
  5. What I’d like to know is “why?” The legal excuse seems weak and if it’s only that, then why not give the Council a heads up? There’s more to this than what’s being said publicly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It’s my understanding that the City’s wasteful motion practice (none of the arguments were grounded in strong legal precedent) has nearly drained the City’s budget for this litigation. Nothing here passes the smell test.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why, it’s almost as if the mayor was trying to make friends with politically connected Albany developers rather than representing his constituents.

      Delete
  7. I view this as classic NIMBY. The only people making a spectacle of this are the residents of Mill St. I understand they don't want the disruption but all people in Hudson want more housing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope.

      1. This is a potential City Charter crises. Say it ain’t so, Joe.
      2. This is evidence of Municipal Capture
      3. This is an assault on NYS environmental law and precedent. Converting state park to apartment complex without due process.
      4. This is a basic property right issue. Title and reverter clause is not clean.

      Worst of all, it is evidence of the City lying to its own residents to help a crooked developer profit.

      Why?

      This was sold as housing for Hudsonians.

      But those apartment buildings would have been assigned to anyone in the country who enter the lottery. It is statistically almost impossible for an existing Hudson resident in need of housing to get access to it.

      But it will cost the city dearly in public services, and all the flood related issues that will linger for decades.

      So if NIMBY is wanting property rights and environmental laws respected, not wanting kids to play in a dangerous 6 foot deep flood canal, not wanting your mayor to sign new contracts in secret without authorization, and not wanting to waste six figures every year defending developers, and not wanting to add more economically challenged residents before we have jobs and above average schools… then sure, we are all NIMBY’s. That is why we constantly ask the city to move this to the 1st Ward or 5th Ward, to our literal backyards.

      ~

      Chip, if the City can arbitrarily and capriciously change title of land, bulldoze over NYS laws on Mill Street, they can do it next to your house and to you, wherever you live.


      Delete
    2. Please, before anyone cries NIMBY, please please collect all the information.

      Delete
  8. This is why political or unwise planning board and other appointments, and the selection of bad or checked out city attorneys, can be so costly for taxpayers. Not to mention clearly conflicted and activist PB members…

    The flawed Mill Street approval would never have happened with a competent planning board not led by Joyner. Kamal legacy.

    If they had selected a site with a clean title owned by the city, not in a flood zone, like the one on Washington Street… We would now see construction cranes and soon housing and Kearney would not lose their $10m Albany grant funding.

    What incredible incompetence and injustice.

    The city could have spent that $100k wasted on lawyers repairing the fund balance, the tax re-assessment, or on a City Manager, park, or just buying taxpayers one blue trash bag per week. How many sidewalks could have been fixed.

    The 11 Common Council members and the BEA should cut off the money spigot for this kind of waste.



    ReplyDelete
  9. I think this is just part of the money drain that City Hall generally is. It's a money-wasting factory, still adhering to 20th century rules and practices. Basically, we are still playing by the old rules that created so many problems, including budget and revenue shortfalls. The whole system needs to be revised, cus it ain't working anymore. A comprehensive audit of spending and revenue is long overdue. It may be forced on us when things unravel, when it's too late.

    ReplyDelete