The featured story in today's Register-Star is Mayor Joseph Ferris's response to criticism for extending the contract to sell the property on Mill Street. Ferris claims, as he has before, that he was advised to take the action he did, without the knowledge or consent of the Common Council, by city attorney Andrew Howard.
In his response, Ferris makes a rather grievous error, claiming that the original contract set the closing date "on or about" May 3, so the contract had not actually expired when the contract was amended on May 20. The following is quoted from the Register-Star article:
"In no way did the closing date for the sale lapse," Ferris said. "(May 3, 2026) was an 'on or about' closing date (in the contract between Kearney and the city), and we, as in city were, and continue to, await the court's decision. . . ."
In fact, the contract of sale, which was executed on May 3, 2023, does not say "on or about"; it says "on or before" (boldface added). The difference between "about" and "before" is significant.
The article has not yet been posted online. When it is, Gossips will provide the link.
COPYRIGHT 2026 CAROLE OSTERINK
Update: Here's the link to the article: "Mayor responds to Mill Street criticism."
Joe was elected on the basis of one thing: he wasn't his predecessor. With no real history here in Hudson, he didn't know the city (or the City), and neither knew him. We're starting to get a clearer vision of who Joe is and what he stands for.
ReplyDeleteWho he is: a politician. Not a leader. A politician. He'll say anything, go anywhere, get his picture taken with whomever if he believes it will help advance his political career. This is clear once one compares his statements to his actions.
What he believes: that we're all quite stupid. He can lie to our faces and we won't figure it out. Again, his actions/words dichotomy supports this conclusion.
I remember talking to Joe last August or so. He said he didn't support a charter change that would replace the mayor's executive functions with a city manager because, in his words, "I believe I can do the job." On the basis of what, I asked? No answer from Joe. Well, now we have 6 months of history together. And the answer to my question is now clear: on the basis of nothing.
This is leadership? This is making tough decisions? Not from where I sit. What it is, is bullshit. Plain, unadulterated, good old American political horse apples.
Congratulations, Joe. You've joined the ranks of Donald Trump and other worthless politicians who will say anything to get elected/re-elected without giving one thought to his/her "constituents." No doubt you're fit for higher office in this regard -- just don't count on too many votes from electors here in Hudson. We may not be geniuses, but we know the difference between truth and everything else.
Ditto everything John posted.
ReplyDeleteThe adjective that comes to mind to describe our so-called mayor is MEALYMOUTHED.
ReplyDeleteI also think it's highly likely that the number of current council members who dislike Ferris is more than there were at any point during his predecessor's six years. Even if the number is the same or similar, that can't be good for the city.
Solution: No more mayors! No more amateur shady bullshit. Halve the number of council members. Hire a professional manager who is accountable to the council and residents. This two-year mayor crap has got to go! I used to think the term needed to be 4 years. Now it's zero years.
As someone who voted for Ferris, I am really disappointed to see that his way of dealing with issues is to throw members of his team under the bus. This is not the first time. As a leader, would love to see more accountability and ownership of the decisions he's made (even if they involve changing his mind).
ReplyDeleteYes , Mayor Ferris was elected, solely because he wasn't his predecessor.
ReplyDeleteThat was how terrible his
predecessor was for Hudson. The thought of him and his sycophants returning and squandering our property taxes, water & sewer and sidewalk,
when he has paid no property, taxes, county taxes, School taxes, water & now sidewalk fees ever;
makes me physically ill.and on top of that, his housing was suppled by Galloway (GALVAN) and he never came clean about that..
Peter Spear dropped out of the mayoral race as he did not want to risk splitting the vote with Joe Ferris and letting
Kamal Johnson back in for another term.
I would like to know if Peter Spear would consider running again in Nov 2027..
Kamal Johnson is chomping at the bit to get back to his free ride again, at the city tax payers expense.Meanwhile, I am going to start getting ready to.put my house up for sale, if it is worst case scenario.
I am disappointed and frustrated with how things are being played out in our fair city right now. The following are my views and my views only:
Delete1. I am very disappointed with Mayor Joe signing that contract. I do believe that he entrusted his next steps to the City Attorney to accurately guide him in what is/was best for the city. (for me - a good/great leader surrounds herself/himself with great people to assist in guiding). Having said that, he is ultimately the leader of the pack and has to own the actions.
The City Attorney seems to be making some significant mistakes.. It would very powerful if this said attorney, spoke out to say exactly what had him conclude (legally) the advise he gave the Mayor.
2. As we know, there is a time period between the signing of the contract and the making it public. What happened there? What precipated the delay? Was the Mayor again counseled to delay?
3. John's F - comment regarding what the 'Mayor believes'...without getting into a verbal warfare with you, JF, we don't 'know' what the Mayor beleives unless and until he states it. Something might appear a particular way that would have us conclude something. I think there is value in all of us being responsible for the words we use, how we use them ...It allows us to be more powerful in our arguments. (tho JF, you are not in need of this...:))
4. Many may not agree with me, some may even think me a bleeding heart, however I do not think Mayor Joe is not malicious. It seems he has made some significant mistakes that have caused many, including me to question what happened along the way...Maybe there is some calculation his part, having to figuring out how to 'get out of this mess' (think Laurel and Hardy). But not malicious.
I did not edit my comments sufficiently. For clarity - I don't beleive Mayor Joe to be malicious.
DeleteTruly, of course, we can't know what anyone really thinks. Even when they tell us what they think. My point was that actions speaker louder than words, a point I could have made more artfully. And, by the way, I agree with you in that I don't think Joe is malicious, either. I think he's in the same bind the last several mayors have found themselves in: the job is not doable by an amateur anymore. We need a city manager.
DeleteMy understanding is that "on or before" is generally to mean the same thing as "on or about" in absence of a "time of the essence" clause. Maybe we have a contract lawyer lurking here who could chime in on this.
ReplyDeleteI agree with all the commenters’ sentiments. They are 100% spot on. I think the real problem is the fact that Hudson is incorporated as a city and not a village within a town, like most municipalities of our size. We are, I believe, the second smallest city by population in New York State. And being a city means we have to pay and manage most of our infrastructure and services seperatly from the town and county, plus have our own separate elected leadership. And because we’re so damn small we have both a limited tax base—exacerbated by both being the county seat and hosting a sizable nonprofit industrial complex. Some of these nonprofits do good, but most are just a form of tax evasion and fundraising for their salaries. The other issue with our “small city” is that we have a very limited talent pool for elected office. And the people who are talented enough have better jobs or are too busy running their own businesses. The mayor’s office always seems to attract a couple of types: Hudson High favorites with limited job prospects, or a wannabe politician’s first gig.
ReplyDeleteAs I see it, there are about two solutions:
1) merge with Greenport, which would become the Town of Hudson, with the Village of Hudson within. Even though it would fix their unfortunate name and identity complex, Greenport won’t do it because Hudson’s too progressive, and probably too tax happy for their tastes. Plus, they got their own problems with their supervisor. I feel like Kamal Johnson should move and run for Greenport Supervisor, since they love him so much and we can foist him on them.
2) Charter Reform to a city manager. Unfortunately, after the last attempt, I feel like that ship has sailed. The alarm was raised and now the nonprofits and developers are organized to campaign against it—as they depend on having a mayor who’s easily manipulated for their tax draining schemes. And no matter what John Friedman believes what Joe thinks about the public, I do think they’re mostly stupid. Maybe ignorant is a better word. But they don’t understand that a city mayor is basically a management position and it’s about running the departments and keeping the machine working and bills paid. But for some reason, most people here want some kinda Mayor McCheese figure walking around town with a sash, shaking hands and kissing babies, and making speeches at No Kings rallies about things that have nothing to do with their current job, but deep down hope they go to Albany and DC one day and make it their job.
So yeah, electing people questionably better than Kamal is all we got. Hey, at least we got rid of Tom too.
Baby steps, Hudsonians. 😘