HudsonValley360, a.k.a. the Register-Star, has been running this ad online, paid for by the SuperPAC Congressional Leadership Fund.
If you click on the ad, which, out of curiosity, I did today, you are treated to a video railing against Antonio Delgado for a rap album he made in 2006 as "AD the Voice." To support its claim that Delgado is "offensively radical," the video quotes three words from an article that appeared in Chronogram on July 20.
Yesterday, the editorial director of Luminary Media, which publishes Chronogram, spoke out against "this SuperPAC attack on Delgado, which takes our coverage completely out [of] context": "Luminary Media Condemns SuperPAC Attack Ad."
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Friday, August 24, 2018
A Second Chance
If you missed The Unicorn Party at Bruno Pasquier-Desvignes farmhouse last Saturday, the good folks at Hudson Hall are giving you a second chance: The Unicorn Party Deux.
Because of popular demand, there will be a second art sale tomorrow, Saturday, August 25, from noon to 4 p.m. Everything in the farmhouse is for sale and, indeed, so is the farmhouse. The prices for Pasquier-Desvignes' whimsical works of art range from $10 to $1,000. Only cash and checks will be accepted, all work is sold as is, and all sales are final.
The farmhouse is located at 410 Water Street Road, which is a right turn off Route 82.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Because of popular demand, there will be a second art sale tomorrow, Saturday, August 25, from noon to 4 p.m. Everything in the farmhouse is for sale and, indeed, so is the farmhouse. The prices for Pasquier-Desvignes' whimsical works of art range from $10 to $1,000. Only cash and checks will be accepted, all work is sold as is, and all sales are final.
The farmhouse is located at 410 Water Street Road, which is a right turn off Route 82.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Of Interest
Amanda Purcell reports today in the Register-Star that former Hudson resident Joseph Best, who is now an immigration attorney in Pittsfield, will be offering free consultations at Christ Church tomorrow with anyone in Columbia County who has questions about their immigration status: "Free clinic to offer legal advice to immigrants." The clinic is one of several arranged each year by the Columbia County Sanctuary Movement.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Thursday, August 23, 2018
Meeting Canceled
If you were planning to attend the Economic Development Committee meeting tonight, it turns out you have the evening off. The meeting has been canceled. That leaves you free to attend Elizabeth Diggs' lecture at the Hudson Area Library, "The Enigma of Ulysses Grant." The lecture begins at 6 p.m.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Wednesday, August 22, 2018
A Little Help from Our Friends
In recent months, two Friends groups have emerged: Friends of Hudson Youth and Friends of Oakdale Lake. At last night's Common Council meeting, Alderman Rich Volo (Fourth Ward) suggested the possibility of another such group: Friends of the Hudson Cemetery.

Volo told his fellow aldermen last night that he and Peter Jung will be meeting with the trustees of the Oakwood Cemetery in Troy "to see how they dealt with problems"--those problems being both grounds keeping and restoration and preservation of monuments. Peter Jung was the moving force, in 2008, behind the restoration of the family plot of Hudson River School painter Sanford Robinson Gifford and has since been working independently, with the knowledge and gratitude of the Department of Public Works, to maintain the Gifford grave site and the areas adjacent to it.


Oakwood Cemetery is an excellent model for efforts to restore and preserve our cemetery in Hudson. Established in 1848, at the height of the rural cemetery movement, Oakwood Cemetery is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, is recognized as "one of the most exceptional cemeteries in the United States," and is the final resting place of people worthy of note: nine Civil War generals, a leader in women's education, and the progenitor of the national symbol, Uncle Sam.
The same things are true of our cemetery. The Hudson City Cemetery is actually older than Oakwood Cemetery, originating in 1784, predating the Rural Cemetery Movement but presaging its principal characteristics: being located outside of the population center and not on church grounds. Although not listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the Hudson City Cemetery was determined to be eligible for listing as long ago as 1983. Thirty years later, in 2013, the now defunct Arts, Entertainment & Tourism Committee of the Common Council decided to pursue National Register designation for the original part of the cemetery, but it was never carried out.
In 2005, Bill Krattinger, historic preservation specialist at the New York State Preservation Office (SHPO), summarized the features of the original Hudson City Cemetery and recommended that the City move ahead with an evaluation of Cedar Park and with the designation process for all or part of the cemetery. Gossips has published the text of this letter before, but the new initiative regarding the cemetery inspires doing it again:
It can be argued that our cemetery is also "one of the most exceptional cemeteries in the United States," and noteworthy people are buried there--more than one artist associated with the Hudson River School, a heroic Civil War colonel, a ship's captain who died fighting pirates in the Caribbean, an American pioneer in photography, to name a few. Let's hope that organizing to pursue the cemetery's National Register designation and to support the restoration, preservation, and beautification of Hudson's cemetery is an idea whose time has finally come.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

Volo told his fellow aldermen last night that he and Peter Jung will be meeting with the trustees of the Oakwood Cemetery in Troy "to see how they dealt with problems"--those problems being both grounds keeping and restoration and preservation of monuments. Peter Jung was the moving force, in 2008, behind the restoration of the family plot of Hudson River School painter Sanford Robinson Gifford and has since been working independently, with the knowledge and gratitude of the Department of Public Works, to maintain the Gifford grave site and the areas adjacent to it.


Oakwood Cemetery is an excellent model for efforts to restore and preserve our cemetery in Hudson. Established in 1848, at the height of the rural cemetery movement, Oakwood Cemetery is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, is recognized as "one of the most exceptional cemeteries in the United States," and is the final resting place of people worthy of note: nine Civil War generals, a leader in women's education, and the progenitor of the national symbol, Uncle Sam.
![]() |
| Oakwood Cemetery |
In 2005, Bill Krattinger, historic preservation specialist at the New York State Preservation Office (SHPO), summarized the features of the original Hudson City Cemetery and recommended that the City move ahead with an evaluation of Cedar Park and with the designation process for all or part of the cemetery. Gossips has published the text of this letter before, but the new initiative regarding the cemetery inspires doing it again:
[T]he portion of the cemetery located west of Paul Avenue and south of Columbia Turnpike was considered as the National Register-eligible portion, containing as it does a noteworthy collection of funerary art, ranging from typically late 18th-century stones executed by a master carver--and embellished with winged effigies and other typical design vocabulary--to tombs, such as the Egyptian Revival-style tomb which is an outstanding reflection of American romanticism in the antebellum period and the interest in that period of utilizing Egyptian design motifs in cemetery design. The cemetery would appear a virtual treasure trove for historians and enthusiasts of American funerary art, offering as it does a wealth of markers and crypts that illustrate various themes and styles within this genre.
I also understand now that there is an adjacent area of cemetery contiguous to the older section being known as Cedar Park--that though not determined National Register-eligible at the time the other determination was made, might well warrant consideration for such, due to the presence of landscape design elements that might well have been rendered by an as-yet identified professional hand.… I would also recommend that … the City of Hudson move ahead with further evaluation and the actual designation process--for either one or both areas depending on the future evaluation of Cedar Park.… Cemeteries are, in my estimation, important historic resources of considerable import to communities, and often eligible for listing on the State and National Registers in association with numerous historic themes as outlined under the applicable criteria.
It can be argued that our cemetery is also "one of the most exceptional cemeteries in the United States," and noteworthy people are buried there--more than one artist associated with the Hudson River School, a heroic Civil War colonel, a ship's captain who died fighting pirates in the Caribbean, an American pioneer in photography, to name a few. Let's hope that organizing to pursue the cemetery's National Register designation and to support the restoration, preservation, and beautification of Hudson's cemetery is an idea whose time has finally come.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
What About the Planning Task Force?
At the informal meeting of the Common Council on August 13, Council president Tom DePietro announced the creation of a Planning Task Force, which, he said, would "encompass the discussions of Local Law No. 9 of 2017 and Local Law No. 5 of 2018, would involve all the relevant agencies ("HDC, HCDPA, Zoning, and Planning"), and would help with the process of the DRI, the LWRP, and "any other group that needs help in planning for housing and other related projects." DePietro promised, "The full details we will have ready for you at the formal meeting."
Last night, at the formal meeting of the Common Council, not a word was said about the Planning Task Force, by DePietro or anyone else, and no member of the Common Council or the public, including Gossips, had the presence of mind to ask about it.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Last night, at the formal meeting of the Common Council, not a word was said about the Planning Task Force, by DePietro or anyone else, and no member of the Common Council or the public, including Gossips, had the presence of mind to ask about it.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Last Night with the Itinerant Common Council
Comments made by Council president Tom DePietro last night, indicated that the Council's peripatetic period may go on for longer than it takes Garriga to regain mobility. He announced that he had arranged for future informal meetings of the Common Council to take place in the community room at the Hudson Area Library through the end of the year. Former Council president Don Moore helpfully noted that the courtroom at the new police and courts building had been designed with the possibility in mind of holding evening meetings there.
This all brings to mind the story, probably apocryphal, of how, before Hudson's first city hall was completed in 1855, the Common Council met in rented rooms in various locations in the city, and for the ten years between 1845, when the City acquired the painting, and 1855, when the Council settled in its new digs at 327 Warren Street, the presence of Henry Ary's portrait of George Washington rendered any room in which the aldermen met to do the City's business the official "Council chamber."
![]() |
| The Council Chamber in Hudson's first City Hall |
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Tuesday, August 21, 2018
Ulysses Grant at the Library
During the final week of September, a play called Grant & Twain will be performed at PS21 in Chatham. On Thursday evening, August 23, from 6 to 7:30 p.m., the creator of that play, Elizabeth Diggs, will be sharing her vast knowledge of Ulysses Grant at the Hudson Area Library, in a lecture entitled "The Enigma of Ulysses Grant."
At the end of the Civil War, Grant was idolized by both North and South. He toured the world for more than two years and was received everywhere by enormous crowds.
Diggs says of Grant's world tour: "He was welcomed by the common people as their hero and by queens and princes as a great man. Known as one of the greatest horsemen of the century as well as a brilliant military leader, he was expected to ride at the head of parades in full military regalia. But he refused. Instead, he explored the world's cities, often alone and on foot, among the common people--a true ambassador for democracy."
Diggs continues: "Grant rose to greatness as a military leader, as President, and as a writer. Yet, he was not ambitious. He hated war, he disliked politics, and he never intended to write his memoirs. When he was forced to pick up his pen due to financial necessity, his book was proclaimed as one of the greatest memoirs of all time."
The lecture, which takes place on Thursday, August 23, from 6 to 7:30 p.m., is free. The library is located at 51 North Fifth Street. More information is available at www.HudsonAreaLibrary.org.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
At the end of the Civil War, Grant was idolized by both North and South. He toured the world for more than two years and was received everywhere by enormous crowds.
![]() |
| Grant with Chinese Governor-General Li Hongzhang in 1879 | Photo: Liang Shitai |
Diggs continues: "Grant rose to greatness as a military leader, as President, and as a writer. Yet, he was not ambitious. He hated war, he disliked politics, and he never intended to write his memoirs. When he was forced to pick up his pen due to financial necessity, his book was proclaimed as one of the greatest memoirs of all time."
The lecture, which takes place on Thursday, August 23, from 6 to 7:30 p.m., is free. The library is located at 51 North Fifth Street. More information is available at www.HudsonAreaLibrary.org.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Following Up
On Thursday, Gossips reported the legislation that would create an independent New York State Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct was on Governor Andrew Cuomo's desk awaiting his signature. He had until last night to sign it, and he did. The law establishes an eleven-member commission, appointed by the governor, the Legislature, and the state's chief judge to investigate claims of misconduct by New York State district attorneys and their assistants. WAMC reported this morning that the governor said the law "will root out any potential abuses of power and will give New Yorkers comfort that there is a system of checks and balances in the criminal justice system."
WAMC also noted that the legislation was opposed by the District Attorneys Association of New York State and reported that Queens DA Richard Brown maintains the law is unconstitutional and will support expected litigation against it.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
WAMC also noted that the legislation was opposed by the District Attorneys Association of New York State and reported that Queens DA Richard Brown maintains the law is unconstitutional and will support expected litigation against it.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Monday, August 20, 2018
Stay Here: Hudson, NY
Readers who stream Netflix can now watch an episode--episode #6--of Stay Here, Netflix's real estate reality show, that documents the transformation of the mustard-colored building on South Seventh Street, between Governor's Tavern and Iron Horse Cigar Depot, from what is described by its owner as a "money pit" into a moneymaker. The show demonstrates very clearly the motivation for converting buildings in Hudson into short-term rentals.
The owner originally intended to develop the ground floor as a retail space and the upper two floors as an apartment. For this reason, he petitioned the Historic Preservation Commission for a certificate of appropriateness to turn the ground floor window at the left into a door, to give access to the retail space, and to cut windows in the large doors under the oriel, because retail spaces need windows. The certificate of appropriateness was granted, and the alterations were made, as seen in this screen capture from Stay Here.
The plan was to rent the retail space for $1,500 a month and the apartment for $2,000 a month, for a total of $3,500 a month. In the Stay Here episode, it is calculated that if the entire building were to be used for short-term rental, the monthly income could be $6,000, for an annual total of $72,000. Presented with this option, the owner, who had already invested close to half a million dollars in the building ($355,000 to buy it and $100,000 on rehabbing it), opted to develop it for short-term rental.
The episode of Stay Here portrays Hudson in a very favorable light. There is wonderful drone photography of the city, and the reality show principals, especially designer Genevieve Gorder, appear to have been tutored in Hudson history. What some Hudsonians may object to, though, is the show's message, aimed it seems at folks who live in Manhattan, that Hudson is "the perfect place to start a short-term rental."
I, of course, have some pedantic observations about the show. Early on, the owner says that the foundation of the building, which throughout the show is referred to as a carriage house, dates from 1789. I don't claim to know the history of this building, and I am genuinely curious to know the evidence that is the basis for this statement. In the 18th century, the city did not extend any farther east than Fourth Street. According to Franklin Ellis' History of Columbia County, Seventh Street was laid out in 1801, at the same time Union Street and Cherry Alley were extended. So if a building existed on that site in 1789, it faced a street that didn't exist yet.
Design details of the building--the pitched gable roof, the overhanging eaves, elaborate truss at the gable end, and the decorative wood trim over the windows and doors--are characteristic of Stick Style, which was popular from around 1860 to 1890. Of course, these elements, along with the oriel, could have been added to a much older building, but the Beers atlas maps of Hudson for 1873 and 1888 show no building on this site.
It seems more likely to me that the building was constructed in 1889 not 1789, but give or take a hundred years, it's still old.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
The owner originally intended to develop the ground floor as a retail space and the upper two floors as an apartment. For this reason, he petitioned the Historic Preservation Commission for a certificate of appropriateness to turn the ground floor window at the left into a door, to give access to the retail space, and to cut windows in the large doors under the oriel, because retail spaces need windows. The certificate of appropriateness was granted, and the alterations were made, as seen in this screen capture from Stay Here.
The plan was to rent the retail space for $1,500 a month and the apartment for $2,000 a month, for a total of $3,500 a month. In the Stay Here episode, it is calculated that if the entire building were to be used for short-term rental, the monthly income could be $6,000, for an annual total of $72,000. Presented with this option, the owner, who had already invested close to half a million dollars in the building ($355,000 to buy it and $100,000 on rehabbing it), opted to develop it for short-term rental.
The episode of Stay Here portrays Hudson in a very favorable light. There is wonderful drone photography of the city, and the reality show principals, especially designer Genevieve Gorder, appear to have been tutored in Hudson history. What some Hudsonians may object to, though, is the show's message, aimed it seems at folks who live in Manhattan, that Hudson is "the perfect place to start a short-term rental."
I, of course, have some pedantic observations about the show. Early on, the owner says that the foundation of the building, which throughout the show is referred to as a carriage house, dates from 1789. I don't claim to know the history of this building, and I am genuinely curious to know the evidence that is the basis for this statement. In the 18th century, the city did not extend any farther east than Fourth Street. According to Franklin Ellis' History of Columbia County, Seventh Street was laid out in 1801, at the same time Union Street and Cherry Alley were extended. So if a building existed on that site in 1789, it faced a street that didn't exist yet.
![]() |
| The building, known as Hudson River Carriage House, today |
![]() |
| Detail of Beers Altas map for 1873 |
![]() |
| Detail of Beers Atlas map for 1888 |
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Meetings of Interest in the Week Ahead
Tonight, which promises to be very pleasant, is an evening off for meeting goers. The fun begins tomorrow.
- On Tuesday, August 21, the Common Council Finance Committee meets at 5:30 p.m. and the formal Common Council meeting begins at 7 p.m. Despite the fact that at the informal Council meeting last week, Council president Tom DePietro maintained that the formal meeting of the Council had to take place at City Hall and admonished the mayor when he suggested otherwise, "Read your code," both meetings will take place not at City Hall but at 1 North Front Street.
- Also on Tuesday, August 21, there's a followup event after the Common Council meeting. Rebecca Wolff announced on Facebook over the weekend a "Common Council After-party" at the Half Moon. The invitation to the event reads in part: "The meeting is at 7 p.m. at the Chamber of Commerce. The After-party starts after the meeting. If you can't make it to the meeting just come to the After-party and we'll fill you in. 'No surprises for After-partiers' is our motto. Live no longer in the dark on municipal life. Civic engagement is a stealth weapon. THIS WILL HAPPEN EVERY MONTH."
- On Wednesday, August 22, there is only one meeting. The Hudson IDA (Industrial Development Agency) is scheduled to meet at 1 p.m. at 1 North Front Street "for the purpose of discussing any matters that may be presented to the Agency for consideration." That's a pretty open-ended agenda. The Common Council Legal Committee meeting, which was scheduled for 6:15 p.m. on Wednesday, has been canceled.
- On Thursday, August 23, the Common Council Economic Development Committee meets at 6 p.m. The meeting, for which no agenda is yet available, is expected to take place at City Hall.
- On Friday, August 24, the Historic Preservation Commission holds its second meeting for the month of August at 10 a.m. at City Hall.
Of Interest
Yesterday, the editorial board of the New York Times made an endorsement in the four-way race for the Democratic nomination for attorney general: "Zephyr Teachout Is the Right Choice as Attorney General for Democrats." The editorial, which is recommended reading, concludes:
The other contenders in the Democratic primary are Letitia James, who has been endorsed by Governor Cuomo; Leecia Eve, who served as counsel to Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton when they were in the Senate; and Sean Patrick Maloney, who is also running for reelection as congressman in New York's 18th District.
The state primary, which is to nominate the Democratic candidate for governor (Andrew Cuomo or Cynthia Nixon) and lieutenant governor (Kathy Hochul or Jumaane Williams), as well as attorney general, takes place on Thursday, September 13. Polls will be open from noon to 9 p.m.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
We believe that Democrats who are seeking a means of standing up to the Trump presidency and graft in Albany can find in Ms. Teachout their most effective champion for democracy and civil rights, good government and the environment, workers' rights, fair housing and gender equality.
![]() |
| Teachout at Basilica Hudson in 2014 |
The state primary, which is to nominate the Democratic candidate for governor (Andrew Cuomo or Cynthia Nixon) and lieutenant governor (Kathy Hochul or Jumaane Williams), as well as attorney general, takes place on Thursday, September 13. Polls will be open from noon to 9 p.m.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Sunday, August 19, 2018
The Great War: August 20, 1918
Today we know that the centennial of the end of World War I is just a few months away. The armistice that ended the fighting was signed on November 11, 1918. But in August 1918, it wasn't clear to anyone that the war was nearing an end. The United States had just upped the age of legibility for the draft to 45, and for the first time men who were fathers could be drafted. Remarkable to us a century later, at least to those of us who are not World War I historians, there were predictions that the war would continue for at least another year. A hundred years ago today, on August 20, 1918, the following appeared on the front page of the Columbia Republican.
At the bottom of the front page of the Columbia Republican for August 20, 1918, as was true of every front page of the weekly paper during this time, there was a picture of the latest batch of inductees, posed on the steps of the courthouse.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
At the bottom of the front page of the Columbia Republican for August 20, 1918, as was true of every front page of the weekly paper during this time, there was a picture of the latest batch of inductees, posed on the steps of the courthouse.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Another Opinion About Local Law No. 5
On Friday, August 10, Gossips reported about a letter from former city attorney Ken Dow advising the Planning Board to recommend that the Common Council not enact Local Law No. 5, the law that would amend the zoning in R2 and R2H districts as it pertains to nonconforming uses. On Monday, August 13, Planning Board chair Walter Chatham received another letter on the subject, this one from John Friedman, a lawyer, who served three terms as Third Ward alderman, two of them as chair of the Legal Committee.
Friedman makes the message of his letter clear in the first paragraph: "I strongly urge the [Planning] Board to recommend that this legislation not be enacted." The letter continues:
What's next for Local Law No. 5, which is now "ripening" on the aldermen's desks, is not clear. At the Planning Board meeting on August 9, Council president Tom DePietro indicated there was a "time limit" for the Planning Board to make a recommendation about the law, intimating that the Council could move ahead without waiting for input from the Planning Board. The monthly Legal Committee meeting, scheduled for Wednesday, August 22, has been canceled, but John Rosenthal, who chairs the Legal Committee, has been invited to appear at the next Planning Board meeting, on Thursday, September 13, to explain the thinking behind proposed Local Law No. 5. On Monday, August 13, DePietro announced a plan to create a Planning Task Force to, among other things, "encompass the discussions" of Local Law No. 9 of 2017 and Local Law No. 5 of 2018, both amendments to the zoning code having to do with nonconforming uses in residential districts. More information about that task force is promised to be presented at the next Common Council meeting, which takes place on Tuesday, August 21, at 7 p.m., not at City Hall but at 1 North Front Street.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Friedman makes the message of his letter clear in the first paragraph: "I strongly urge the [Planning] Board to recommend that this legislation not be enacted." The letter continues:
I have no objection to either [Stewart's or Scali's] expanding in the manner in which they have each indicated they wish to. Unfortunately, the solution encapsulated in the proposed local law is legally flawed for a number of reasons. There issues have more than adequately been addressed by Ken Dow's cogent and learned memo. . . .Friedman goes on to recommend a "better and legal approach to solving the issue of commercial development in areas where it is not otherwise permitted by the City's existing zoning code": a commercial overlay.
Properly drafted, this statutory device permits a property owner in specific circumstances to petition the Board to have such an overlay placed in a specific location subject to Board-mandated operational parameters. This is a rather well-understood mechanism for solving the need for neighborhood-anchoring commercial spaces (such as bodegas, taverns, laundromats, etc.) in districts where such development is prohibited by zoning, while simultaneously protecting the integrity of the neighborhood fabric. I strongly urge the Board (and the Council) to research this option as it can often obviate issues surrounding spot zoning and legislative licensing. I also strongly urge the Board to advise the Common Council to vote "no" on proposed Local Law No. 5.The recommendation of a commercial overlay brought to mind the Green Street Overlay District proposed by Stewart's in January, so I asked Friedman if that proposal was what he had in mind. He told me it was not, but the concept was the same. What he was recommending was a "commercial corner overlay," which presumably could be applied to areas throughout the city where there are historic nonconforming commercial uses in residential districts and not just in R2 and R2H districts.
What's next for Local Law No. 5, which is now "ripening" on the aldermen's desks, is not clear. At the Planning Board meeting on August 9, Council president Tom DePietro indicated there was a "time limit" for the Planning Board to make a recommendation about the law, intimating that the Council could move ahead without waiting for input from the Planning Board. The monthly Legal Committee meeting, scheduled for Wednesday, August 22, has been canceled, but John Rosenthal, who chairs the Legal Committee, has been invited to appear at the next Planning Board meeting, on Thursday, September 13, to explain the thinking behind proposed Local Law No. 5. On Monday, August 13, DePietro announced a plan to create a Planning Task Force to, among other things, "encompass the discussions" of Local Law No. 9 of 2017 and Local Law No. 5 of 2018, both amendments to the zoning code having to do with nonconforming uses in residential districts. More information about that task force is promised to be presented at the next Common Council meeting, which takes place on Tuesday, August 21, at 7 p.m., not at City Hall but at 1 North Front Street.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Thoughts About Supermarkets
This evening, Bill Williams of 95.5 The Cat contacted Gossips to say that the second part of the supermarket rumor has been confirmed. ShopRite is indeed moving to the Price Chopper location, farther out on Fairview Avenue: "Hudson Price Chopper to close, ShopRite to move." Williams reported on Friday morning: "ShopRite is moving. We're told they will be moving into the current Price Chopper and former thrift shop next door. The new ShopRite will have a pharmacy and auto repair center. That move is expected before the end of the year." (I won't bother to point out that neither Price Chopper nor ShopRite is actually in Hudson.)
Hudson is a food desert, a USDA designation earned because, for most residents of the city, there is no supermarket within one mile. Using a location below Third Street as the starting point, ShopRite, our closest supermarket, is 2.1 miles away, and Price Chopper, soon to be the new location of ShopRite, is 3.2 miles away. For people who don't own cars, these distances are significant. There are plans to relocate Aldi's to a new retail center planned for the current site of McDonald's, where Healy Boulevard meets Fairview Avenue. Aldi's will be the anchor store, a new McDonald's its centerpiece. The proposal for the new retail development is currently before the Greenport Planning Board. The new Aldi's would be marginally closer to Hudson than the current ShopRite, but ShopRite is expected to move before the end of the year, and there's no telling how long it will be before Aldi's new location is constructed.
At the second DRI public workshop, Larisa Ortiz, the retail specialist on the planning team assigned to Hudson, reported that Hudson residents spend $5 million annually at the supermarkets of Greenport. She also asserted that Hudson could support a 10,000 square foot grocery store. To put that in perspective, the Golub Corporation, which, in addition to abandoning its Greenport site, is rebranding and changing the name of its stores to "Market 32," built a new store last year in Fort Edward. The Schenectady Daily Gazette reported at the time that the new supermarket, around 41,000 square feet, is among the smallest in the chain. According to Golub CEO, "the size that works best" is 55,000 to 65,000 square feet. The article in the Daily Gazette helpfully points out: "Counting the end zones, a U.S. football field is 57,600 square feet."
Gossips research finds that the only supermarket chain with stores as small as 10,000 square feet is Trader Joe's.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Hudson is a food desert, a USDA designation earned because, for most residents of the city, there is no supermarket within one mile. Using a location below Third Street as the starting point, ShopRite, our closest supermarket, is 2.1 miles away, and Price Chopper, soon to be the new location of ShopRite, is 3.2 miles away. For people who don't own cars, these distances are significant. There are plans to relocate Aldi's to a new retail center planned for the current site of McDonald's, where Healy Boulevard meets Fairview Avenue. Aldi's will be the anchor store, a new McDonald's its centerpiece. The proposal for the new retail development is currently before the Greenport Planning Board. The new Aldi's would be marginally closer to Hudson than the current ShopRite, but ShopRite is expected to move before the end of the year, and there's no telling how long it will be before Aldi's new location is constructed.
At the second DRI public workshop, Larisa Ortiz, the retail specialist on the planning team assigned to Hudson, reported that Hudson residents spend $5 million annually at the supermarkets of Greenport. She also asserted that Hudson could support a 10,000 square foot grocery store. To put that in perspective, the Golub Corporation, which, in addition to abandoning its Greenport site, is rebranding and changing the name of its stores to "Market 32," built a new store last year in Fort Edward. The Schenectady Daily Gazette reported at the time that the new supermarket, around 41,000 square feet, is among the smallest in the chain. According to Golub CEO, "the size that works best" is 55,000 to 65,000 square feet. The article in the Daily Gazette helpfully points out: "Counting the end zones, a U.S. football field is 57,600 square feet."
Gossips research finds that the only supermarket chain with stores as small as 10,000 square feet is Trader Joe's.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Saturday, August 18, 2018
Supermarket Shuffle
The rumor that's been swirling around for months now was confirmed yesterday in the Register-Star: the Price Chopper in Greenport is closing. The family-owned, regional supermarket chain headquartered in Schenectady is closing the store on Fairview Avenue "because of the area's economic downturn." That's according to a spokesperson for the Golub Corporation Mona Golub.
The article notes that Price Chopper opened a store in Greenport forty years ago. That store was located in what is now Movieplex 8. Golub is quoted in the article as saying, "Back then that part of town was a good place to do business. Now, the population has decreased and the traffic has declined and other local retailers have either relocated or left the area." That strikes me as a rather curious perception. It's noted in the article that the current store, which opened about twenty years ago and which I've always considered too big, preferring the smaller and closer ShopRite, is "one of the company's smallest and older stores." I guess in the chain store business--be it supermarket or convenience store--bigger and newer are always better.
The rumor has a second part, which I seriously hope is not true: ShopRite, which is closer and more convenient for us Hudsonians, is moving to the current Price Chopper location. It seems to me, if Price Chopper is closing the store because of "the area's economic downturn," the decrease in population, and the decline in traffic, those same woes would beset ShopRite in that location, which in its present location seems to be a bustling and thriving concern.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
The article notes that Price Chopper opened a store in Greenport forty years ago. That store was located in what is now Movieplex 8. Golub is quoted in the article as saying, "Back then that part of town was a good place to do business. Now, the population has decreased and the traffic has declined and other local retailers have either relocated or left the area." That strikes me as a rather curious perception. It's noted in the article that the current store, which opened about twenty years ago and which I've always considered too big, preferring the smaller and closer ShopRite, is "one of the company's smallest and older stores." I guess in the chain store business--be it supermarket or convenience store--bigger and newer are always better.
The rumor has a second part, which I seriously hope is not true: ShopRite, which is closer and more convenient for us Hudsonians, is moving to the current Price Chopper location. It seems to me, if Price Chopper is closing the store because of "the area's economic downturn," the decrease in population, and the decline in traffic, those same woes would beset ShopRite in that location, which in its present location seems to be a bustling and thriving concern.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Foster's Remediation Complete. Now What?
At the Common Council Public Works and Parks Committee meeting on Wednesday, DPW superintendent Rob Perry reported that, after ten years, the cleanup of the brownfield that was Foster Refrigerator was almost complete.
Perry reported that the area was being hydroseeded, and yesterday morning when Gossips visited the site it appeared that process had been completed. The grass will start sprouting in about a week.
What remains is for the City to decide what to do with this newly remediated parcel. In April 2012, Mayor William Hallenbeck had the idea of using the site for a dog park. Dog park advocates were enthusiastic about the possibility for several reasons:
At Wednesday's Public Works and Parks Committee meeting, Alderman Eileen Halloran (Fifth Ward) asked Perry about potential uses for the site. His answer indicated that it could be used for just about anything so long as the use involved building up and not down into the ground. Given that, in this city desperate for affordable housing, someone is sure to suggest it could be used for some kind of housing development, no matter that it would be adjacent to a manufacturing plant and the waste water treatment plant. Gossips, however, is of the opinion that it would make a perfect dog park.
Dog owners in Hudson have been advocating for a dog park for close to a decade. Last year, Mayor Tiffany Martin, nearing the end of her term in office, decided to make good on the promise of a dog park and determined in October that the best location for a dog park was the underutilized Charles Williams Park. A dog park had, after all, been part of the original plan for the park.
The people who live in the five houses adjacent to the park vehemently protested the plan to site the dog park there. In December, the Common Council passed a resolution opposing creating a dog park in Charles Williams Park and calling on the mayor to "explore constructing a dog park at another location within the City of Hudson." In the discussion preceding the vote on the resolution, Rick Rector, then mayor elect and First Ward alderman, said, "I don't think we can completely erase [Charles Williams Park] as a possibility, because there are not a lot of possibilities, but I will as the next mayor convene a conversation with the community about the best possible place to have a dog park."
The resolution was vetoed by then mayor Tiffany Martin, who asserted that she had determined Charles Williams Park the logical choice, "after evaluating every available green space owned by the City of Hudson." When the mayor's veto message was received by the Council, it was January, and there was a new Council and a new mayor. The Council did not vote to override the veto. Instead Council president Tom Depietro observed that the mayor who had vetoed the resolution was no longer the mayor and promised, "The entire issue will be revisited by the Council and the mayor."
We are now eight months into the terms of the new Council and the new mayor, and the topic of the dog park has not been revisited in any public way. Let's hope when it is the newly remediated brownfield that a previous mayor identified as the possible site of the dog park will be among the green spaces owned by the City of Hudson under consideration. In Gossips' opinion, it would be the best possibility.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
![]() |
| Photo by Gibson |
What remains is for the City to decide what to do with this newly remediated parcel. In April 2012, Mayor William Hallenbeck had the idea of using the site for a dog park. Dog park advocates were enthusiastic about the possibility for several reasons:
- It is several thousand square feet and is already surrounded by a fairly new six-foot chain link fence.
- There is ample space to create separate areas for large dogs and small dogs.
- It is large enough to ensure that dogs can exercise there and not just use it to relieve themselves.
- The site is not located in a high-density residential area where neighbors might be disturbed by barking dogs.
- There is ample room for parking.
- The site has an existing water supply.
At Wednesday's Public Works and Parks Committee meeting, Alderman Eileen Halloran (Fifth Ward) asked Perry about potential uses for the site. His answer indicated that it could be used for just about anything so long as the use involved building up and not down into the ground. Given that, in this city desperate for affordable housing, someone is sure to suggest it could be used for some kind of housing development, no matter that it would be adjacent to a manufacturing plant and the waste water treatment plant. Gossips, however, is of the opinion that it would make a perfect dog park.
Dog owners in Hudson have been advocating for a dog park for close to a decade. Last year, Mayor Tiffany Martin, nearing the end of her term in office, decided to make good on the promise of a dog park and determined in October that the best location for a dog park was the underutilized Charles Williams Park. A dog park had, after all, been part of the original plan for the park.
The people who live in the five houses adjacent to the park vehemently protested the plan to site the dog park there. In December, the Common Council passed a resolution opposing creating a dog park in Charles Williams Park and calling on the mayor to "explore constructing a dog park at another location within the City of Hudson." In the discussion preceding the vote on the resolution, Rick Rector, then mayor elect and First Ward alderman, said, "I don't think we can completely erase [Charles Williams Park] as a possibility, because there are not a lot of possibilities, but I will as the next mayor convene a conversation with the community about the best possible place to have a dog park."
The resolution was vetoed by then mayor Tiffany Martin, who asserted that she had determined Charles Williams Park the logical choice, "after evaluating every available green space owned by the City of Hudson." When the mayor's veto message was received by the Council, it was January, and there was a new Council and a new mayor. The Council did not vote to override the veto. Instead Council president Tom Depietro observed that the mayor who had vetoed the resolution was no longer the mayor and promised, "The entire issue will be revisited by the Council and the mayor."
We are now eight months into the terms of the new Council and the new mayor, and the topic of the dog park has not been revisited in any public way. Let's hope when it is the newly remediated brownfield that a previous mayor identified as the possible site of the dog park will be among the green spaces owned by the City of Hudson under consideration. In Gossips' opinion, it would be the best possibility.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Friday, August 17, 2018
A Unique Opportunity on Saturday
Tomorrow, Saturday, August 18, Hudson Hall invites the public to visit the charming Livingston home of Bruno Pasquier-Desvignes for "The Unicorn Party," a late summer garden soiree and open house celebrating the work of this iconic Hudson Valley artist. Visitors have the opportunity to purchase any of the thousands of artworks on display and even the house itself.
A special preview showing for friends of Hudson Hall takes place from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. tomorrow, followed by an open house and public sale from 2 to 5 p.m. To make a reservation for the preview, click here. For more information about the event, including the location of the house, click here.
Update: Online reservations for the members-only preview have closed. Current friends of Hudson Hall and those seeking to become friends to attend the preview are asked to see a member of the Hudson Hall staff upon arrival.
Filled with wonderfully expressive sculptures made from found and recycled materials, paintings, etchings, murals, and musical whirligigs, Pasquier-Desvignes' home is a one-of-a-kind installation of this unique artist's life work.
Pasqueir-Desvignes is of the same generation of artists who sparked Abstract Expressionism, Minimalism, Pop Art, and other "isms," while being fully attuned with the less genre-bound artistic experiments of the early Modernists. Born in the village of Saint-Lager, near Lyon, France, in 1930, he has lived in Jamaica, Mexico, Peru, and Asia. His home encapsulates, through his art, many of these experiences, and his larger than life presence.
In 1995, Pasquier-Desvignes was approached by his famous film producer neighbors, Ismail Merchant and James Ivory, to create paintings and drawings for their film Surviving Picasso. An artist and friend, R. O. Blechman explains: "When Merchant-Ivory asked Bruno to create Picasso-like drawings for their film Surviving Picasso, little did they guess that they would get Picasso-Plus drawings. And when I saw his little metal sculptures, little did I guess that I would be looking at several Calder-Plus sculptures."
Pasquier-Desvignes' work is of infinite creativity and playfulness. He made an animated version of the French epic poem The Song of Roland with corks and toothpicks, filled Grand Central Station with his sculptures, and created a short-lived but much heralded installation of Rube Goldberg-like contraptions at the Emerson Resort in the Catskills, home to the world's largest kaleidoscope. For the anniversary of Robert Fulton's first steamboat on the Hudson, he created a junk barge that sailed the river.
The special preview takes place tomorrow from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.; the public sale is from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. Click here for more information.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
A special preview showing for friends of Hudson Hall takes place from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. tomorrow, followed by an open house and public sale from 2 to 5 p.m. To make a reservation for the preview, click here. For more information about the event, including the location of the house, click here.
Update: Online reservations for the members-only preview have closed. Current friends of Hudson Hall and those seeking to become friends to attend the preview are asked to see a member of the Hudson Hall staff upon arrival.
Filled with wonderfully expressive sculptures made from found and recycled materials, paintings, etchings, murals, and musical whirligigs, Pasquier-Desvignes' home is a one-of-a-kind installation of this unique artist's life work.
Pasqueir-Desvignes is of the same generation of artists who sparked Abstract Expressionism, Minimalism, Pop Art, and other "isms," while being fully attuned with the less genre-bound artistic experiments of the early Modernists. Born in the village of Saint-Lager, near Lyon, France, in 1930, he has lived in Jamaica, Mexico, Peru, and Asia. His home encapsulates, through his art, many of these experiences, and his larger than life presence.
In 1995, Pasquier-Desvignes was approached by his famous film producer neighbors, Ismail Merchant and James Ivory, to create paintings and drawings for their film Surviving Picasso. An artist and friend, R. O. Blechman explains: "When Merchant-Ivory asked Bruno to create Picasso-like drawings for their film Surviving Picasso, little did they guess that they would get Picasso-Plus drawings. And when I saw his little metal sculptures, little did I guess that I would be looking at several Calder-Plus sculptures."
Pasquier-Desvignes' work is of infinite creativity and playfulness. He made an animated version of the French epic poem The Song of Roland with corks and toothpicks, filled Grand Central Station with his sculptures, and created a short-lived but much heralded installation of Rube Goldberg-like contraptions at the Emerson Resort in the Catskills, home to the world's largest kaleidoscope. For the anniversary of Robert Fulton's first steamboat on the Hudson, he created a junk barge that sailed the river.
The special preview takes place tomorrow from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.; the public sale is from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. Click here for more information.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Thursday, August 16, 2018
A Reminder About Comments
Totally anonymous comments will not be published on this blog. I don't care if you adopt a synonym that you use consistently, but you must distinguish yourself in some way.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Awaiting the Governor's Signature
In July 2017, the Common Council passed a resolution calling for the New York State Legislature to pass S.2412B/A.5285A to create an independent New York State Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct "specifically designed to investigate complaints of misconduct by prosecutors and impose discipline on prosecutors who violate the law." The issue and the resolution was introduced to the Council by Second Ward alderman Tiffany Garriga.
Creating a Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct would allow a fair procedure for the public to voice concerns regarding improper prosecution, lack of prosecution, and selective prosecution. Specifically, the commission would:
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Creating a Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct would allow a fair procedure for the public to voice concerns regarding improper prosecution, lack of prosecution, and selective prosecution. Specifically, the commission would:
- receive complaints and initiate their own investigation when it appears prosecutorial misconduct may have occurred;
- ensure the right to a fair trial by enforcing the obligation of prosecutors to observe acceptable standards of conduct and to establish accountability for the conduct of prosecutors during the performance of their functions, powers, and duties;
- allow citizens to voice their concerns over improper prosecution and have the ability to discipline a prosecutor or allow him or her to clear their name of wrongdoing.
Mr. Cuomo has made criminal-justice reform a signature of his long career in public service; as governor he's overseen the shuttering of more than a dozen prisons and restored voting rights to tens of thousands of New Yorkers on parole. He knows as well as anyone that prosecutorial misconduct is a serious and stubborn problem that has largely defied solution. By signing this bill, he would move New York in the right direction, as well as set an important example for the rest of the nation.In a press release received yesterday from the coalition called "It Could Happen to You," Garriga is quoted as saying: "Legislation that would be first in the nation, legislation that is a model for the rest of the country. Yes, I believe the governor wants to be on the right side of history."
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

































