All of this was happening during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the fear and uncertainty engendered by the pandemic caused Kessler's lenders to decide investing in a hotel might not be a good idea and withdraw. As a consequence, work on the project did not proceed as expected, and on March 1, 2024, the project was not completed. Indeed, it hadn't even begun. It was regularly reported that Kessler was seeking other investors. In February 2024, just days before the deadline for completing the project written into the contract with the IDA, Kessler appeared before the HPC seeking a new certificate of appropriateness, which was granted, because the design had not changed since the HPC had granted the original C of A in February 2021.
In the two years since the deadline passed, IDA staff kept in touch with Kessler. In his reports to the IDA, Mike Tucker regularly included 620 Union Street, indicating there was no change in the status of the project and noting that, if the project were to proceed, it would require an entirely new application.
At the IDA meeting today, Jonathan Spampinato, who took over as administrative director of the IDA on June 15, said he had met with Kessler and asked him to schedule a meeting with the IDA, with his lawyers and lenders present, to explain his intentions. Because no such meeting was scheduled, Spampinato sent a letter to Kessler on June 29, which he emailed on July 30, explaining that the IDA would, at today's meeting, be considering a resolution to authorize a recapture process to the recoup the $25,000 of exempted mortgage recording tax received by the project. That resolution can be found here. (Scroll down twelve pages to find it.) At today's meeting, the resolution was approved.
There are also taxes owed on 620 Union Street, and city treasurer Heather Campbell, who serves on the IDA, wondered if 62o Union Street might belong on the foreclosure list. "If he doesn't come current with the taxes," Campbell asked, "what happens to the property?" Christine Chale, legal counsel to the IDA, advised, "Foreclosure would be a separate process. The City would have to follow up." Meanwhile, the missed payments are in default of the agreement with the IDA.
Gossips followed this project closely in 2o2o and 2o21, during its review by the Planning Board, the HPC, and the IDA. Gossips will follow it closely through this process as well.
COPYRIGHT 2025 CAROLE OSTERINK



A Hudson Growth Opportunities list...
ReplyDeleteA website of properties delinquent, under-invested, empty lots... RFS (Request for Services/Startups), or SMBs for sale, would be a great asset.
Maybe the CEDC and the Mayor's Office can put that together to grow and attract private investors. Maybe the HDC, HBCi, CCCC, or the Columbia County Tourism Board... all overlapping entities, most of whom have paid staff, with inward looking social events... but who is looking outward?
Who is flying to LA, SF, and driving to Boston, NYC, and pitching Hudson NY as a more climate resilient outpost?
The American economy is exploding with money, thousands of new private investors, now even more with all the coming AI exits, looking to diversify.
If City Hall spent 1/10th of the time attracting private investment, cutting red tape, lowering taxes, treating PB applicants and residents equally... than what it used to spend courting Albany's public grants-with-strings... $1.5m "outdoor classrooms" grants, or sidewalk taxes, or $800k per apartments public housing on am unstable landfill, we'd have more housing, more historic renovations, more parcels on the tax roll, and more high paying jobs.
Has any politician gotten to the top 10 employers in the City together for breakfast (because they work and and have real jobs) and asked them how we can help their businesses grow? And what they needed when they started out?
The CC has spent more time talking about what "diversity" is for the Charter Commission, than asking what parts of the Charter Commission hurts economic growth or resident equality.
At this point Diversity is simply having competence, because it is absent amongst most career politicians.
And kudos to Mr. Spampinato for looking out for the City, and following the right procedure.
DeleteAnd for context, see here:
1. Newburgh, NY:
https://www.cityofnewburgh-ny.gov/248/Buying-City-Owned-Property
2. Portsmouth, NH:
https://www.portsmouthnh.gov/economic/economic-revitalization-zones-erz
3. Pekin, IL:
https://www.ci.pekin.il.us/313/Available-Land-and-Buildings
Thank you, Jon, and thank you, Carole, for continuing to keep the community informed about this issue. Regardless of anyone's opinion of the original project, I think most residents would agree that public incentives should come with accountability. If deadlines are missed and commitments aren't met, it's appropriate for the City and the IDA to protect taxpayers' interests and pursue the remedies available to them.
ReplyDeleteIt's encouraging to see the IDA taking action rather than simply letting the matter drift. Hudson residents and property owners are expected to meet their obligations every year. It's only fair that publicly supported development projects are held to the same standard.