Earlier today, this photograph of the construction in progress at 76 North Seventh Street appeared on Facebook.
The picture inspired me to revisit a post from a couple of months ago: "The Naming of Projects." That in turn inspired me to check if the website HudsonDepotLofts.com, which at that time was only a secured domain name, was up and running. It is. And here are a couple of images from that website.
Readers are encouraged to explore the website, which provides this description of Hudson Depot Lofts:
Regarding the building proposed for the opposite side of the street, the one in this "mixed income development" meant for households with incomes between 40 and 80 percent of AMI, the project has twice tried and twice failed to get funding from New York State Homes and Community Renewal (HCR). It is rumored, but Gossips has not yet been able to confirm, that the project has been disqualified for HCR funding because three houses on the site were demolished, eliminating four dwelling units, before funding for the new building had been secured.
After taking a walk down what was once a quiet street of residential houses, a more apt title heading would be "The Devolution of 7th Street."
ReplyDeleteJust another reminder of how short our memories are.
ReplyDeleteIs there any way to reverse/cancel the PILOT? They said they were building one thing and turned around and built something else.
ReplyDeleteIt can't be said that they are not building what they said they would build. But they don't seem to be marketing the building as "workforce housing." The test will be when they start leasing the apartments. Are they being leased to people with incomes between 80 and 130 percent of the AMI? If that's not the case, I believe the PILOT can be revoked.
DeleteTo add further to the last paragraph... if I heard correctly, during a council meeting a couple of months ago, when asked about the project, Prez Tom mentioned off the cuff that since Galvan was denied the HCR funding, they would be returning to the IDA to ask for a new PILOT for the other side of the street. If that's correct, let's hope they get a big fat "no" so they can fully finance their boutique lofts on their own and pay taxes, like the rest of us do.
ReplyDelete