Anyone who follows Strong Towns knows that parking is a frequent subject of the articles published. This is yesterday's offering: "But Where Will I Park?" The article contains this paragraph, which summarizes the Strong Towns position on parking: Once upon a time, Hudson had quite stringent offstreet parking requirements for new development. For eating and drinking establishments, one offstreet parking space was required for every three seats in the bar or restaurant. Hotels needed a parking space for every room. There was also a formula for providing offstreet parking for offices and work settings. Projects before the Planning Board for site plan review were regularly referred to the Zoning Board of Appeals for variances because they could not satisfy the offstreet parking requirements, and the ZBA regularly granted such variances.
In 2019, on the recommendation of the Planning Board, then chaired by Walter Chatham, a proponent of New Urbanism, the Common Council amended the city's zoning code to eliminate offstreet parking requirements. Even though the idea of eliminating offstreet parking requirements originated with the Planning Board, the Planning Board has remained obsessed with parking. Parking was an issue with the hotel proposed for 620 Union Street, it was an issue for the apartment buildings proposed for the "Depot District," and it is an issue for the hotel the Galvan Foundation is proposing for Fourth and Warren streets. Parking is a favorite concern not only for members of the Planning Board but also for members of the public.
At Tuesday's Planning Board meeting, Mark Nadolny of Creighton Manning presented the traffic and parking study done for the hotel proposed by the Galvan Foundation for corner of Warren and Fourth streets. He explained they had studied The Wick Hotel and, based on activity at The Wick, had determined that the proposed hotel would need 25 parking spaces for its 30 rooms. A five-minute walk determined the radius of the area they studied for potential parking--an area that extends to the middle of the 300 block of Allen Street to the south, somewhere in the 300 block or the 400 block of State Street to the north, the 200 block of Warren Street to the west, and Sixth Street to the east. Within this area, Nadolny reported there were 600 onstreet parking spaces, and only 211 to 226 of them were occupied between 10 p.m. and midnight on the nights they did the analysis, leaving a surplus of more than 200 spaces. Hotel would need only 25 of those.
The traffic and parking report provoked a lot of comment--from members of the Planning Board and the public. Dustin Duncan, the newest board member, noted that the parking study considered only hotel guests and not patrons of the bar and restaurant. Nadolny responded that both were small and were intended primarily as amenities for guests. First Ward Alder Margaret Morris observed, "Looking at what's available at midnight is not realistic. You need to look at when guests are parking their cars." She suggested that guests would be parking their cars in the afternoon or early evening, when they would have to compete for parking spaces with shoppers and diners along Warren Street.
Planning Board member Valerie Wray asked if they had considered valet parking and putting cars overnight down at the train station. Bill Huston expressed the opinion that this was "the wrong location for a 30-room hotel" and asked, "What hotel guest is gonna walk five minutes to a hotel?" Second Ward Alder Mohammed Rony expressed concern about parking for Warren Street venues spilling over into the neighborhoods, particularly Columbia Street. Dan Hubbell, who was standing in for Charles Gottlieb as legal counsel for the Galvan Foundation at the meeting, reminded the Planning Board that there are no offstreet parking requirements.
The upshot of the discussion at the Planning Board meeting was that a committee of three members--Duncan, Wray, and Clark Wieman--would select a consultant to review the traffic and parking study done by Creighton Manning.
Meanwhile, the City of Hudson is pursuing its own parking study, which is being called a "Parking Improvement Feasibility Study." The RFP for this study was issued at the end of January, and responses were due on February 25. It is expected that the consulting firm chosen to undertake the study will be announced next week, on Wednesday, March 16.
The scope of services outlined in the RFP is introduced in this way:
Hudson is in the midst of changes that impact parking. Tourism and visitors to Hudson is increasing,
particularly on weekends. Residents are moving in and out, and some areas have experienced changes in the
number of residents who own vehicles. In order to optimize for changes in parking patterns, we are
examining opportunities to develop additional sites for accessible structured and surfaced parking as well as
changes in parking policy.
The City is requesting development of a comprehensive Parking Improvement Strategy that analyzes current
and growing parking needs, identifies challenges and opportunities, and creates a framework for safer, more
accessible parking capacity and highly effective way-finding in ways that complement the City’s walk-able,
attractive urban environment.
Speaking with Gossips today, Third Ward Alder Ryan Wallace, who had a role in drafting the RFP, said that parking studies done for specific projects consider only a two or three block radius and do not take into account the "wave effect" on a broader area of the city. The parking study being undertaken by the City will be holistic--looking at all of the city, at different times of day, on different days of the week, in different seasons (spring to summer), and on at least one holiday weekend (Memorial Day). It is expected the study will be completed by the end of June.
The RFP can be found here. More information about the project provided in response to questions from those considering making a proposal can be found here. COPYRIGHT 2022 CAROLE OSTERINK