For the first project, Promenade Hill, the firm that will oversee the restoration of the historic promenade and the redesign of the entrance plaza has been chosen. It is Starr Whitehouse, the firm that, in its presentation to the committee, talked about "sensitivity to place" and respecting the "original design intent" and, rather than talking about Promenade Hill as an underutilized space, acknowledged that people went to Promenade Hill just to watch the sunset.
Photo: David Voorhees |
- Arterial
- NV5
- Weintraub Diaz
- Nelligan White Architects
- Tighe & Bond
- Barton & Loguidice
- Alta Planning + Design
- South Col Engineering
- MJ Engineering and Land Surveying
At the next DRI Committee meeting, on September 10, it will be determined, based on the evaluations, which of the nine firms made the cut. The committee will also be talking about the remaining two projects--the Shacks and the Dunn warehouse--with representatives from the State Historic Preservation Office. Who will be coming from SHPO is not clear. It may be Bill Krattinger; it may be Weston Davey; it may be both or someone else altogether. The conversation about the two projects is likely to involve site visits--at least one to the Shacks, once known as the Furgary Boat Club.
On the topic of the Dunn warehouse, it has been determined that Empire State Development wants DRI funds used to leverage private investment, so the $1 million in DRI money designated for the Dunn warehouse cannot be used unless the City partners with a private developer. It has finally been determined, however, that the $500,000 Restore New York grant, awarded to the City for the Dunn warehouse in January 2018, can be used to stabilize the building. Warning that the building may not make it through another winter, Rector said emphatically, "Let's get it fixed first with the half million."
COPYRIGHT 2019 CAROLE OSTERINK
Thanks and congratulations to the DRI committee for their own historico-aesthetic sensitivity in choosing Starr Whitehouse for the Promenade.
ReplyDeleteShould be interesting to hear how the State Historic Preservation Office will justify ending the continuous HISTORICAL USE of the fisherman's Wharf at North Dock.
ReplyDeleteWhat a strange idea, that SHPO has any part in "ending" anything. In fact, SHPO is the very office which officially recognized the same historic use which prevented the City from tearing the shacks down four years ago.
DeleteYour beef is with the owner of the upland and the underwater land, the City of Hudson, and its temporary interruption of the historic use of the shacks.
If you want to do something useful, then help point out the City's hypocrisy in allowing a private enterprise to operate from the City-owned dock in the waterfront park.