Mapping Yesterday's Results

A Gossips reader couldn't find a map that showed the county-by-county results of yesterday's Democratic primary in New York's 19th Congressional district, so he created one himself and gave Gossips permission to share it.

The source of the data is the New York State Board of Elections, which is now reporting results from 436 of the 458 election districts. The percentages given indicate the percentage lead of the first place winner in each county over the candidate coming in second.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

Thanks to Steve Dunn for providing this map

Of Interest

Sam Pratt comments on the outcome of yesterday's primary: "Instant takeaways from the NY-19 Democratic primary."

But Then, It May Be . . . Over That Is

Click here to view the election results being reported by the New York Times.

The Bigger Picture

The New York State Board of Elections is now reporting the following results from 385 of 458 election districts in CD19: Brian Flynn 4,320; Erin Collier 1,493; Gareth Rhodes 5,708; Pat Ryan 5,465; Antonio Delgado 7,022; Jeff Beals 4,331; Dave Clegg 3,763.

It Isn't Over Until It's Over

The unofficial election night results now being reported by the Columbia County Board of Elections are as follows: Brian Flynn 505; Erin Collier 157; Gareth Rhodes 1,156; Pat Ryan 639; Antonio Delgado 840; Jeff Beals 478; Dave Clegg 195. Of course, that's just Columbia County. There are ten other counties in New York's 19th Congressional District.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

Warriors or Guardians?

Since last night, Gossips hasn't had a chance to report on the Common Council Police Committee meeting, but there is no need. Dan Udell's video of the meeting is now available on YouTube and can be viewed by clicking here.

COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

Land for Sale

Strapped for cash, the Hudson Community Development & Planning Agency (HCDPA) is selling off some of the vacant property it owns in Hudson, mostly in the Second Ward. The first parcel offered for sale is a relatively narrow strip of land between 209-211 Columbia Street and 215 Columbia Street that runs from  Columbia Street through to Prison Alley. The parcel is being sold by sealed bid. Bids on the property will be accepted by HCDPA at 1 North Front Street until 2 p.m. on Thursday, July 26, after which time "the bids will be opened and publicly read aloud at a special meeting of HCDPA" to take place at 1 North Front Street. The bid package, which gives complete information about the parcel, provides directions for submitting a bid, indicates the minimum bid, and includes the form for submitting a bid, can be found here.     
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

The Kaz Site and One Monument Square

At the special meeting held by Hudson Development Corporation (HDC) on June 7 about the redevelopment of the Kaz site, Mark Morgan-Perez cautioned against issuing a new RFP (request for proposals), warning that it "could actually scare away developers." The idea being that this might seem to be a project that would never actually happen. I was reminded of this when I read recently about a three-day design workshop that took place in Troy last week, hosted by the City and conducted by River Street Planning and Development, to gather ideas from residents and business owners about how to redevelopment One Monument Square.

Photo: John Carl D'annibale|Times Union

What struck me was not that Troy was taking a community-driven approach to planning for this critical 1.18 acres on its waterfront but that this would be Troy's fifth attempt to come up with an acceptable plan for redeveloping the site. We're only stalled on our second attempt with the Kaz site.

The first time around, in 2016, Sustainable Community Associates (SCA) was the chosen developer, and the plan was to create a mixed-use development that included residential, retail, co-working office  and live/work spaces, "designed to LEED Gold standards, utilizing geothermal or other high-efficient heating, and maximizing passive solar heating and natural ventilation." Early in 2017, despite a visit from Chuck Schumer in December 2016 to announce his help and support, that plan was put on hold and ultimately abandoned.

A new RFP was issued in early October 2017, and by the end of November 2017, proposals had been received from four developers: SCA (the same proposal submitted before), Redburn Development, Kearney Realty & Development Group, and Bonacio Construction. SCA withdrew its proposal early on, and since November 2017, the HDC Board has been vetting the remaining three developers, assessing their financial security and viability and visiting projects they have completed in other cities. This vetting process, despite a show of little or no confidence from the community, is apparently continuing.

HDC has tried to reassure the community that the selection of a developer will be followed by six months of community-driven planning before a final plan is developed, but people aren't feeling reassured. They want to see up front renderings of what the buildings will actually look like. They want to feel comfortable that the development of this site won't have a negative, character-altering impact on the city. 

HDC seems confident that the DRI (Downtown Revitalization Initiative) process produced enough public input to inform the development of this site, but members of the community clearly think otherwise. Perhaps we, like Troy, need a three-day planning workshop to create a plan that will then be presented to developers instead of issuing an RFP that defines "development goals" and leaves it to the developer to come up with the plan.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

The Great War: June 25, 1918

The front page of the Columbia Republican for June 25, 1918, includes several items of interest: a report about a patriotic meeting at The Playhouse, during which all twelve reels of "the famous Donald Thompson films were thrown on the screen"; the account of a patriotic meeting in the Public Square, where the speakers "addressed the big audience from an automobile," urging thrift and asserting that "the waste of this country in one year would feed France for the same period"; and an article predicting the defeat of Germany was in sight and quoting Lloyd George as saying, "The number of Americans who have come since March is sufficient to satisfy the allies and ultimately defeat Germany." But the item that reveals most about the local impact of the war at the beginning of that summer is this one, which outlines a plan to ensure the crops of the nearby farms would be harvested.   

Of the men attending the meeting, A. Frank Bogardus was a principal in Downing & Bogardus, wholesale and retail dealers in flour, feed, hay, and grain--"the largest business of its kind in the city," located in Franklin Square; Charles S. Rogers owned "the oldest and largest wholesale grocery house in Hudson," located at 745 Columbia Street; C. H. Evans was, with his brother Robert, the owner of C. H. Evans & Sons Brewery; Dr. Yeisley was the minister of the First Presbyterian Church. The research at Ancestry.com indicates that L. C. Bashford may have been a farmer from Chatham.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

Meetings of Interest in the Week Ahead

On Monday, June 25, there are two Common Council committee meetings. 

• The Fire Committee meets at 5:30 p.m. There is no agenda available for this meeting, but at the Common Council meeting on Tuesday, June 19, Dominic Merante (Fifth Ward), who chairs the committee, intimated that requests for additional funding for the Fire Department were in the offing. The meeting will be an opportunity to learn more about this.
• The Police Committee meets at 6:00 p.m. It is expected that Fourth Ward supervisor Linda Mussmann and others will be there to protest the deployment of the Shared Services Response Team in Hudson on June 5, which Mussmann has characterized as "a militarized raid on Hudson." The meeting is expected to be a continuation of the conversation started at the informal Common Council meeting on June 11 and pursued at the Board of Supervisors Public Safety Committee on June 20.

On Tuesday, June 26, there are two meetings of interest, both of which Gossips will miss because it is also the day of the Democratic Congressional primary, and I will be spending the day at the polls.

• At 12 noon, the Hudson Development Committee (HDC) board meets at 1 North Front Street. There are likely to be updates on the acquisition of property from CSX to give the Kaz site access to South Front Street and the financial review of the three developers that have submitted proposals for the Kaz site, and possibly the announcement of new board members and a progress report from the search committee tasked with finding a replacement for executive director Sheena Salvino, who will be leaving in early August.
• At 5:30 p.m., the Common Council Finance Committee will meet. There may be other things on the agenda, but the main business will be parceling out $20,000 to worthy festivals and events. This task used to be done in May by the Arts, Entertainment & Tourism Committee, but since that committee no longer exists, it has fallen to the Finance Committee, and it's being done at the end of June, after two of Hudson's major events—the Flag Day Parade and the OutHudson Pride Parade—have already happened. In past years, these two events have, between them, gotten more than a quarter of the money, so it will be interesting to see if they get any money this year for expenses already incurred.

On Wednesday, June 27, there are once again two meetings, back to back.

• At 6 p.m., there is a special meeting of the Common Council to discuss the budget amendment requested by the Youth Department.
• At 6:15 p.m., the Legal Committee is scheduled to meet, so either all the problems and questions surrounding the request for an additional $50,751.75 for the Youth Department have been worked out and answered behind the scenes and the special meeting will be over in fifteen minutes, or the Legal Committee meeting won't start until the special meeting of the Council is over. Stewart's Shops and its request for a zoning amendment to accommodate a desired expansion will likely once again to be on the agenda.

On Thursday, June 28, at 5:30 p.m., the Tourism Board, will meet for the first time. The law that established the 4 percent lodging tax in Hudson also created the Tourism Board, "empowered to take all reasonable steps it determines desirable, necessary and proper to market the City of Hudson as a destination for overnight and daytrip visitors by making use of the funds set aside by the City Treasurer." Those funds are a percentage of the revenue from the lodging tax: 50 percent of the first $250,000; 25 percent of the second $250,000; 10 percent of everything beyond $500,000, not to exceed $250,ooo a year. Alderman Rich Volo (Fourth Ward) chairs the board, which is made up of mayoral and Council appointees: Ted Gramkow, Chuck Rosenthal, Tambra Dillon, Kristen Keck, Jeff Hunt, David Brown, Ellen Thurston, and Jamie Smith Quinn.

COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

HPC Holds a Second Public Hearing

On Friday at 5 p.m., the Historic Preservation Commission held a public hearing to receive comment on the proposal to amend the southern and western boundaries of the Union-Allen-South Front Street Historic District, Hudson's largest locally designated historic district, encompassing most of the city south of Warren Street. (It's the orange area on the map below.) The reason for the amendment is a discrepancy between the intent of the members of the HPC who did the inventory for the district and the actual description of the district that accompanied the resolution that created the district passed by the Common Council in 2006.

The intent was that the district extend to the river on the west and Power Avenue to the south, to include such significant historic properties as the Robert Taylor House, the train station, the Dunn building, and Basilica Hudson.

The HPC has been discussing the discrepancy on and off for years. It caused a problem back in 2012, when the Galvan Initiatives Foundation wanted to move the 1790 home of the tanner Robert Taylor from its location at the head of Tanners Lane to a site on Union Street. It was argued at the time by Galvan that the house was not in a historic district and nothing in the documentation for its individual designation specifically addressed the historic significance of its location. What has prompted the HPC to take action at this time is the imminent development of the Dunn building and the redevelopment of the Kaz site. 

The original historic preservation ordinance, adopted in 2003, gave the HPC the power to designate individual properties and neighborhoods as landmarks and historic districts, a status that protected the historic character of buildings and neighborhoods from inappropriate alterations and incompatible development. When the HPC started exercising this power, however, the law was suspended by then mayor Rick Scalera and rewritten to require the Common Council to approve all historic designations. The amended law went into effect in June 2005. All the historic districts that currently exist were created during a two-year window of time—2006-2007—when supporters of historic preservation had enough votes on the Common Council to pass the resolutions creating the districts. Since that time, no new historic districts have been created.

A resolution to amend the south and west borders of the Union-Allen-South Front Street Historic District came before the Common Council in April, but it was tabled by Council president Tom DePietro, who alleged that the HPC had not prepared the resolution and the accompanying documents properly and had not notified some of the property owners affected by the boundary amendment. The problem stemmed from an error in the map that accompanied the resolution, showing the new boundaries. The map used Worth Avenue as the eastern boundary, setting off a wave of rumors that the HPC was trying to pull the properties on Worth Avenue into the district. 

So the HPC started over: a new map, a new round of written notification (the first round had been letters instead of the prescribed post cards), a new public hearing, held at 5 p.m. instead of at 10 a.m., which is the HPC's usual meeting time, to convenience the architects and contractors who typically represent the building owners in presenting applications. Despite the efforts, the public hearing on Friday was poorly attended. In addition to Gossips and DePietro, there were six people in the audience. After an introduction by Phil Forman, chair of the HPC, in which he tried to dispel some of the misperceptions about the HPC—"We don't opine on paint colors; we're not involved in everyday repairs; we don't opine on like for like changes; we don't dictate building use"—and give assurance that the HPC exists "to protect what is" and that historic designation was "a bit of an insurance policy for current homeowners from inappropriate demolition and the construction of new buildings in your face, blocking the view," comments from the public were invited. Forman had even provided comment sheets and pens for people who wanted to share their thoughts but were reluctant to speak in a public meeting.

The first to speak was Peter Tenerowicz, who didn't make a comment but asked a question on behalf of the Hudson Power Boat Association. He wanted to know if historic designation would interfere with repairs to the building or prohibit change of use. Forman told him that only demolition or significant changes to the exterior of the building would fall into the purview of the HPC.

The next person to comment was Heinrich von Ritter, who owns vacant property at the end of Tanners Lane. He complained, "I've been trying to sell my property, and all I get is blackballed." When last Gossips checked, in February 2016, von Ritter was asking $6 million for the property. He proposed a project in the DRI process to be called "Tannery High Rise," which was rejected because it was not a stand-alone project but sought to be part of the Kaz redevelopment project.

The next person to comment was Cross Street resident Ed Csukas. His statement was simple: "Historic designation can't come fast enough as far as I'm concerned." He wanted to know if there was anything residents could do to make it happen, and Forman answered, "Talk to your aldermen. Tell them you are a constituent, and you think this is a benefit." Fellow Cross Street resident Teresa Meza wondered how things were moving forward "with that mysterious area behind Cross Street," referring presumably to the Kaz site.

Sophie Henderson, deputy director of Basilica Hudson, presented a letter from Basilica founders Melissa Auf der Maur and Tony Stone declaring their full support of the boundary amendment and the protections it provides.

Tenerowicz then asked about the time frame. Forman first referred the question to DePietro, who was seated beside Tenerowicz, but then said that the HPC would vote on pursuing the proposal at its next meeting on July 13, and it would be another month and possibly two before the proposal would be taken up by the Common Council.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

The Transformation of Our Back Streets

In the press release that announced the memorable exhibition at the Hudson Opera Hall in December 2016, No Parking: The Alleys and Garages of Hudson, the late Bill Hellermann, whose photographs, along with those of Lisa Durfee and Peter Spear, were featured in that show, is quoted as saying, "I happened to notice in the summer of 1998 that gentrification had unmistakably taken off in Hudson. However, by contrast, I found that the garages were often more visually interesting than the buildings on the main thoroughfares. They have an accidental beauty."

Twenty years later, as the gentrification of Hudson continues, the "accidental beauty" of those garages and alley buildings is in danger. The fate of one such building, an early 20th-century garage on Partition Street (not officially an alley but perceived as one), behind 439 Union Street, came up in discussion toward the end of the Historic Preservation Committee meeting this morning.

In August 2017, the proposal to demolish this pre-World War II garage and replace it with a new building came before the HPC. The building wasn't structurally unsound. It was perfectly fit for its intended purpose as a garage and storage, but the owners of the property wanted to use it for human habitation, which meant it would need a new foundation, and code enforcement officer Craig Haigh predicted, "This building will fall apart if they have to lift it and put it on a new foundation."

The plan to demolish the original garage and build a "new, similar building" on its footprint first came before the HPC on August 11, 2017. HPC member Miranda Barry described what was first proposed as "a new, generic contemporary building." The applicant came back with another design, meant to replicate the existing building, and the HPC granted a certificate of appropriateness, persuaded that the new design would preserve the integrity and character of the streetscape.  

This morning, after the business before the HPC was concluded, Barry explained that she was almost late for the meeting because on her way to City Hall, she was detained by someone who wanted to complain about the "massive" new building on Partition Street. In the discussion that ensued, questions were raised about whether it had actually been built on the footprint of the original building and if the height exceeded what had been approved. 

After the meeting, Gossips went to take a look at the new building and concluded that the building is probably exactly what was approved, with the exception of the window on the second floor of the south facade, which appears to be much taller and narrower than what appeared in the elevation drawing.

The building is in fact taller than the original and made to appear even taller by what appears to be a steeper pitch of the gable roof.  What is most striking, though, is that the new building completely fails to replicate the character of the original. Maybe fences and plantings will help--softening the stark newness of the structure--but there is no doubt that the character of this stretch of Partition Street has been significantly altered.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

The First Hour of the Meeting

Tuesday night's Common Council meeting had been going on for an hour before the part of the meeting we've already reported on began. The first hour of the meeting was taken up primarily with a discussion of a resolution to amend the budget for the Youth Department, adding $50,751.65 to be taken from the fund balance.

This is not the first time the Youth Department has needed its budget amended. Back in 2016, after the summer program at Oakdale was over, the Youth Department was $4,000 over budget, with four months go in the year. That year, the Council approved a transfer of $25,000 to the Youth Department to keep it going. In the budget for 2017, the Youth Department budget was increased by 6.1 percent, and it was proposed that instead of moving the entire operation to Oakdale for the summer, which seemed to be greatest cause of financial stress, the Youth Center at Third and Union streets would remain the primary location throughout the year. As it turned out, summer program in 2017 happened at Oakdale just as it had in the past. Before the summer began, the Common Council approved, on May 16, 2017, transferring $75,266 from the fund balance to the Youth Department budget.

At the Common Council meeting on Tuesday, four new resolutions were introduced having to do with the Youth Department. The first transferred $8,500 from the Youth Donations account to "the proper accounts to pay for water treatment of Oakdale lake, re-distribution of sand at Oakdale beach and other improvements to the beach house." The second accepted $5,973.21 in donations from the Polar Plunge, which happened back in February. The third accepted $2,025.00 in Fishing Derby donations. The fourth requested an increase of $50,751.75  in the Youth Department budget, to come from the fund balance. (The amount budgeted for the Youth Department in 2018 is $370,000.) 

The attachments to the resolution itemized how the money would be used: $6,951.17 for the fire alarm system at the Youth Center; $3,990 for a finger printing protocol for Youth Department employees; $6,995 for an electronic check-in system; $4,000 to repair the heating system at the Youth Center; $1,049.48 for staff uniforms (T-shirts and hoodies); $5,700 for a fence at Oakdale to keep balls from rolling into the lake; $9,300 for repairs to the beach house at Oakdale; $3,526 to pay staff to make repairs to the beach house; $9,240 to pay the lifeguards at Oakdale Lake.

Dominic Merante (Fifth Ward), who sits on the Youth, Education, Seniors & Recreation (YES&R) Committee, was the first to comment on the proposed resolution. He urged that the Council reassess some of the requests. Kamal Johnson (First Ward), who chairs the YES&R Committee, argued that the money requested was needed to address safety issues. Eileen Halloran (Fifth Ward) maintained there were things that "cannot wait," citing in particular the fire alarm system. Later, Nick Zachos, youth director, indicated that the alarm system could wait, because there is no programming at the Youth Center during the summer. Rob Bujan (First Ward) suggested they go down the list and decide items were critical and which could be deferred. Zachos identified four priorities: finger printing ($3,990), the fence at Oakdale (($5,700), repairs and renovations at Oakdale ($12,826), and lifeguards ($9,240). Tom DePietro, Council president, suggested they delete money for the fire alarm ($6,951.17) and the heating system ($4,000) at the Youth Center and vote on the amount that remained: $39,800.48.

It was then that city treasurer Heather Campbell interrupted the process with some observations: the Council had just accepted $8,000 in donations for the Youth Department; there was $5,000 in donations from last year in the Youth Department budget that had not been spent; last year's $75,266 budget amendment included $13,400 for improvements to the Youth Center, which included fire suppression and the heating system, and money was being requested again for the same purpose. 

After much discussion (all of which can be viewed in Dan Udell's video), during which Bujan suggested amending the resolution "to insist that donated money be used first before dipping into the fund balance," and Zachos and Peter Frank, speaking presumably on behalf of Friends of Hudson Youth, insisted that donations were not unrestricted funds (the Fishing Derby donations, for example, were specifically for water treatment and stocking the lake with fish), DePietro decided the resolution could not be amended on the fly and called a special meeting to take up the issue. That meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, June 27, at 6 p.m., at City Hall.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

More News from the City Website

The Zoning Board of Appeals public hearing and the regular meeting of the ZBA scheduled for tonight have been cancelled. The meeting of the Common Council Public Works and Parks Committee seems to be going forward as scheduled, even though it's likely that DPW superintendent Rob Perry, whose monthly report is the major business of the meeting, may be otherwise occupied, dealing with the water main break that has left most of the city without water. 
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

Water, Water . . .

If there is no water coming out of your faucets, or if the water pressure is very low, you are not alone. The whole city is affected. There was a major water main break at Columbia and North Front Street. This information was found on the City of Hudson website, which is now being used to keep the community informed.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

Housing Plans and Zoning Amendments

At the Common Council meeting last night, Joe Czajka, senior vice president of Hudson Valley Pattern for Progress and chair of the Housing Task Force convened last year by Mayor Tiffany Martin Hamilton to work "in tandem" with the DRI (Downtown Revitalization Initiative) process, presented to the Council the Strategic Housing Action Plan (SHAP), the work product of the Housing Task Force. The aldermen were given the first 30 pages of a 146-page document--a document that is available in its entirety online.

In presenting the document, Czajka outlined the four goals of the plan--(1) preserving housing; (2) creating a comprehensive and complementary housing policy and zoning; (3) producing new housing opportunities; (4) creating housing and community development programs and partnerships--and identified the three "foundational recommendations" of the plan: (1) hire a housing coordinator; (2) adopt an affordable housing policy; (3) update the City's 2002 comprehensive plan and its zoning. Czajka stressed that strategic and action were the critical words in the title and recommended that the Housing Task Force continue going forward, meeting on a quarterly basis, to monitor progress in implementing the plan. He urged the Council to adopt the SHAP before submissions in the CFA (Consolidated Funding Application) program are due at the end of July, indicating that some of the proposals being submitted would benefit from having the SHAP in place, and Council president Tom DePietro indicated that it would fit within the Council's schedule, since the aldermen would be voting on adopting the SHAP at their meeting on July 17. It's interesting that the Council could not vote on a resolution to support the proposed route of the Empire State Trail through Hudson without holding a public hearing, but no one suggested that a public hearing might be needed before adopting this rather wide ranging plan.

On the related topic of zoning, the Council received last night, as a communication, a letter from Chuck Marshall of Stewart's Shops who apparently has joined forces with Steve Scali, owner of Scali's Pizza and Pasta, another commercial entity that is a nonconforming use in an R-2 residential district, to try to persuade the City to alter its zoning to allow the expansion of nonconforming uses in residential districts.

When Gossips last reported on this issue, after the Legal Committee meeting on May 23, the committee was considering the "hybrid option," amending the code to allow nonconforming uses to be enlarged or relocated on the same lot, to allow an existing nonconforming use to be changed to another nonconforming use, and to allow a nonconforming use to be reestablished if it had been discontinued for more than a year. The way things were left at the end of the meeting was the amendments to Section 325-29 of the code would be submitted to the full Council for consideration. That didn't happen last night, and apparently some things transpired behind the scenes. 

Last night, Gossips asked John Rosenthal (Fourth Ward), who chairs the Legal Committee, what had prompted the letter from Scali and Marshall. He said that he had spoken with Marshall about the proposed "hybrid option" and the letter was a response to that. The letter, which introduces terminology and concerns that were never mentioned in Legal Committee meetings, begins:

At the May 23rd Legal Committee Meeting, a recommended change to Local Law No. 9, was voted out of committee, but failed to reach the desks of the full Common Council. It is our understanding that the stumbling block to an amendment getting set on the Council Members' desks, is that the prohibition of the expansion of non-conforming uses does not address "historic concerns" surrounding Stewart's and Scali's, both family and employee owned businesses.

The letter goes on for five more paragraphs. The point seems to be that Stewart's and now Scali's as well are not content with a zoning amendment that would redefine nonconforming use to allow them to do everything but expand beyond the lots they currently occupy, and they are holding out for an overlay district that would allow for the progressive transformation of an essentially residential neighborhood into something that resembles the unchecked commercialization found just over the border, along Fairview Avenue and Union Turnpike, in Greenport. 

In 1965, the Healy Farm--93 acres between Fairview Avenue (Route 9) and Union Turnpike (Route 66), just beyond Hudson's northern border with Greenport--was sold for a shopping center and industrial development. The following article appeared in the Times Union for June 8, 1965.

  
Three years later, in December 1968, the City of Hudson adopted its zoning. It's not hard to surmise that a desire to protect Hudson's residential neighborhoods from the kind of commercial development happening in Greenport was the impetus for making existing commercial establishments on Fairview Avenue and Union Turnpike in Hudson nonconforming uses. Fifty years later, with two Gothic houses about to be demolished to create a new shopping mall in Greenport, with a bigger and better McDonald's as its centerpiece, an amendment that would allow nonconforming uses to rebuild and reconfigure without expanding beyond their current lots, demolishing houses in the process, still seems like a good idea, particularly since preserving housing is the first goal of the Strategic Housing Action Plan.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

Mayor Appoints New Commissioner

Mayor Rick Rector just announced the appointment of Mark Bryant as Commissioner of Youth for the City of Hudson.

In the past, Bryant served as assistant police commissioner in Hudson, and he is currently on the board of the newly launched Friends of Hudson Youth. 
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

Mark Your Calendars

Last Monday at the informal Common Council meeting, the resolution supporting the route selection through the city for the Empire State Trail was tabled, because, although the trail through Hudson follows city streets and many people worked very hard to get the best outcome for Hudson, it was decided there needed to be a public hearing about the route before the Council could approve it.

The date and time of that public hearing has now been announced. It will take place on Monday, July 9, at 6:30 p.m., at City Hall--just prior to the informal Common Council meeting for July.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

Rhodes Here on Wednesday

On Sunday, the New York Times endorsed Gareth Rhodes as the candidate to beat John Faso in November: "Gareth Rhodes in the 19th District." If you haven't met him yet (he's been in Hudson a few times), you will have a chance to do so on Wednesday, June 20, when he will be holding a town hall meeting here in Hudson. 

Rhodes at Vincent Mulford Antiques on June 4      Photo: Will Dendis|HV1

Rhodes in the OutHudson Pride Parade on Saturday

In his campaign, Rhodes has visited every one of the 163 cities and towns that make up the vast 19th Congressional District. Now, in the final two weeks before the primary next Tuesday, he's been holding town hall meetings in each of the eleven counties in the district. Columbia County is eighth in the schedule. The town hall meeting will take place from 6:30 to 8:30 on Wednesday, June 20, in the Community Room at the Hudson Area Library, 51 North Fifth Street.   
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK

Meetings of Interest in the Week Ahead

For those who haunt City Hall, attending meetings, Monday, June 18, is a day off. Meeting-wise, the week begins on Tuesday.

On Tuesday, June 19, the Common Council holds its regular monthly meeting. In addition to the Council voting on all the resolutions introduced at the informal meeting on June 11, it is expected that Sheena Salvino, executive director of HCDPA (Hudson Community Development & Planning Agency), and Joe Czajka, senior vice president of Hudson Valley Pattern for Progress, will present the Strategic Housing Action Plan, the work product of the Housing Task Force convened last year by Mayor Tiffany Martin Hamilton to work "in tandem" with the DRI (Downtown Revitalization Initiative) process.

On Wednesday, June 20, the Common Council Public Works & Parks Committee meets at 5:15 p.m., followed by the Zoning Board of Appeals at 6 p.m. The ZBA is holding a public hearing about the area variance needed for offstreet parking by Hudson Mainstay, located at 437 Warren Street.

On Thursday, June 21, the Common Council Economic Development Committee meets at 6 p.m. The agenda for that meeting is not yet available, but at the HCDPA (Hudson Community Development & Planning Agency) meeting last week, executive director Sheena Salvino said she was planning to propose to the Economic Development Committee that the City swap the two parcels it owns at the end of Warren Street for 235 Warren Street. Four parcels make up this sad little mostly asphalt open space that the end of Warren Street: two belong to the City of Hudson; the other two belong to HCDPA.

HCDPA owns 235 Warren Street, the land on which Thurston Park was created in 1997. The park was named for John W. Thurston, the Proprietor who owned that parcel of land in 1785 when the city was incorporated.

The idea is that the City will take ownership of Thurston Park and make it dedicated parkland, which it isn't now (in fact, in 2010, 235 Warren Street appeared on the HDC website in a list of properties available for sale), and HCDPA will market the entire lot at the end of Warren Street as a potential building site. Up until sometime shortly after 1970, two buildings stood on that site, which can be seen in this 19th-century picture taken from the entrance to Promenade Hill and in this detail from a 1970 aerial photograph of the first block of Warren Street. 

The point was made that the "park" at the end of Warren Street didn't need to exist because it was right across the street from one of Hudson's major parks, Promenade Hill. Architect Walter Chatham, who chairs the Planning Board and is ex officio a member of the HCDPA Board, commented that, "from an urban design standpoint," there should be a building there.

On Friday, June 22, the Historic Preservation Commission holds its second meeting for June at 10 a.m. at City Hall. Later on Friday, at 5 p.m., the HPC will hold a public hearing on its proposal to amend the southern and western boundaries of the locally designated Union-Allen-South Front Street Historic District to resolve a discrepancy between intent and resolution that happened back in 2006 when the district was created. The public hearing will take place at City Hall. More information about what's being proposed and why it matters will follow.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK