Friday, May 25, 2018

Three Years Later

If you search for "Ginsberg's" here on Gossips, you will find a number of posts from 2014 and 2015, most with links to Sam Pratt's blog, about the proposed expansion of Ginsberg's Foods. The project was fraught with controversy. The Ghent Planning Board denied site plan approval, but the decision that was overturned by Judge Richard Koweek. CEDC (Columbia Economic Development Corporation) sold the land for the new facility--33 acres--to Ginsberg's for $1. Pat Grattan, then chair of the Columbia County Board of Supervisors, protested that the county had paid $110,000 for the property and asked CEDC to pay the county back. David Crawford, then president of the CEDC board, was forced to resign because his firm, Crawford Associates, was handling the permitting and engineering work for the project.

Now, three years later, the Register-Star reports the latest chapter in the Ginsberg's story: "Ginsberg's Foods will have to pay $280,000 for property it bought in 2015." The contract with CEDC required that the new facility be operational by August 2018, and it does not appear that condition will be met.

Change at City Hall

Arriving for the Historic Preservation Commission meeting this morning, I noticed there were brand-new chairs on that dais--chairs to be used by the aldermen and the members of the various regulatory boards that meet at City Hall. 

Unfortunately, nothing has been done to improve the torturous seating provided for the general public.


The "Hybrid Option"

In April, to assist the Common Council Legal Committee in seeing a way forward in responding to the request from Stewart's Shops that the City adopt its proposed Green Street Overlay District, city attorney Andy Howard outlined three options: the committee could recommend that the Council deny the request; it could recommend the request be granted; or it could propose a different solution. It was agreed that the third option--the "hydrid option"--be pursued. Howard would draft an amendment to the zoning code that, it was suggested, would address not only the Stewart's issue but also the problem the previous Council hoped to remedy with the ill-fated Local Law No. 9 for 2017: buildings with a history of commercial uses ending up in residential districts where the permitted commercial uses are very limited.

At the Legal Committee meeting this past Wednesday, Howard presented the draft amendment. As proposed, it would revise Section 325-8 of the zoning code--the section of the code pertaining to R-2 residential districts--and would, "in order to encourage the upkeep, renovation and continuation of nonconforming uses presently existing in the R-2 District," allow for "the renovation, replacement and/or expansion of currently existing nonconforming uses within said R-2 District." 

There were questions about the proposed amendment. The one that got the most attention was whether or not "replacement and/or expansion" meant that nonconforming uses could expand onto adjacent properties, which is precisely what Stewart's wants to do. Committee member Rich Volo expressed concern about allowing expansion to exceed the lot currently occupied by a nonconforming use. Committee chair John Rosenthal spoke of the need to control expansion if it were to be allowed to spread to adjacent sites. There was also a question about whether this amendment, tailored as it was for R-2 districts, would also apply to R-3 and R-4 districts.

As he had in April, Howard outlined three options for going forward:
  • The committee could do nothing and recommend that the Council deny Stewart's request for a zoning change;
  • It could allow for a building with a nonconforming use to be altered and reconfigured so long as it remained within the same lot;
  • It could allow a nonconforming use to expand on a greater area and set limits on the size of the new consolidated parcel.
When it was suggested that the committee vote, Volo expressed his preference for the second option, Rosenthal seemed inclined to favor the third, and committee member Shershah Mizan said he wanted the decision to be made by the full Council.

At this point in the discussion, Howard suggested that the issue might better be addressed by amending Section 325-29, the part of the code that defines the restrictions on nonconforming uses. The code currently states that a nonconforming use "may be continued indefinitely," but it cannot be "enlarged, extended or placed on a different portion of the lot"; "be changed to another nonconforming use"; "be reestablished if such use has for any reason been discontinued for a period of over one year, or has been changed to or replaced by a conforming use." Howard suggested that this section could be amended to allow buildings with nonconforming uses to be enlarged or relocated on the same lot, to allow an existing nonconforming use to be changed to another nonconforming use, and to allow a nonconforming use to be reestablished if it has been discontinued for more than a year.

It was decided that the amendment should be made to Section 325-29 not Section 325-8, and that the proposed amendment, without prior review by the Legal Committee (at least not in a public meeting), would be submitted to the full Council for consideration.

Thursday, May 24, 2018

The News We Wait for Every Spring

Chief Ed Moore today announced the suspension of alternate side of the street overnight parking for the summer.
Beginning at 12 a.m. on May 26, 2018, and ending at 8 a.m. on September 30, 2018, weekend alternate side parking in the City of Hudson shall be suspended. To clarify, alternate side parking is suspended Friday nights into Saturday mornings and Saturday nights into Sunday mornings.

Mark Your Calendars, All Ye Worried About Kaz

Gossips just received word that Sheena Salvino has announced a special meeting of the Hudson Development Corporation (HDC) Board to take place on Thursday, June 7, at 5:30 p.m., at 1 North Front Street. The subject of the meeting will be the redevelopment of the Kaz site.

What's Happening at East Jeezus?

The 9.9-acre parcel on the waterfront south of the "deep water" dock, the transfer of which was allegedly a condition of the state approving Hudson's 2011 Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and the failure to execute that transfer is cited as the reason Hudson does not today have an approved LWRP with all its benefits and protections, dropped off the radar soon after The Valley Alliance revealed in June 2013 that 4.4 of the 9.9 acres actually still belonged to the City of Hudson, because the sale of the parcel to St. Lawrence Cement in 1981 had been illegal.

Image: The Valley Alliance
Last evening, a Gossips reader reported changes on the very 4.4 parcel whose ownership has been in question. The land was brush-hogged and mowed recently and a barrier of stones constructed to prevent vehicle access. The transformation makes the site a little like Rick's Point.

It was revealed in 2016 that the City's negotiations with Holcim for the transfer of the 9.9 acres had broken down in 2013 because A. Colarusso & Sons had started its negotiations for the purchase of all the Holcim holdings in Hudson and Greenport, and Colarusso wanted the 9.9 acres to use as a "staging area." Colarusso took possession of the Holcim property in early in 2015

The new "improvements" made on the 4.4 acres believed still to be owned by the City of Hudson raise some questions: Who did the work and why? What does it mean? Does it signal some resolution in the contested ownership of this parcel?

Back in December 2013, Gossips asked the same questions about bulldozing and gravel spread on the 4.4 acres. That time, it turned out to be associated with Amtrak making repairs to the railroad tracks. This time, the intent appears to be different, but you never know. 

Wednesday, May 23, 2018

Ear to the Ground

At Tuesday's HDC (Hudson Development Corporation) meeting, Seth Rapport, who served as president of the HDC board in the past and recently rejoined the board, delivered an eloquent statement about the necessity of support from the community and the Common Council. His entire statement can be heard in Dan Udell's video, beginning at 38:30, but the gist of it is captured in this sentence: "It is my belief, and no one will convince me otherwise, that the viability and effectiveness of this board is vitally connected to the strong, consistent support both from the community and the Common Council."

Gossips has since learned and confirmed that Rapport and three other members of the HDC board--Kristal Heinz, Duncan Calhoun, and Brian Stickles--have resigned, as has Matt Griesemer, counsel to HDC. Griesemer is a member of law firm Freeman Howard; city attorney Andy Howard is a founding member of that firm.   

Mark Your Calendars and Reserve Your Seat

On Monday, June 4, the seven candidates vying to be the Democrat who challenges John Faso in November will be in one place: right here in Hudson in the auditorium at Montgomery C. Smith Intermediate School.

All seven candidates--Jeff Beals, Dave Clegg, Erin Collier, Antonio Delgado, Brian Flynn, Gareth Rhodes, Pat Ryan--have confirmed they will be there for the debate presented by the League of Women Voters. Click here to get your ticket and ensure you'll be there, too.

On the Topic of Urban Planning

At yesterday's Hudson Development Corporation meeting, Council president Tom DePietro suggested that the HDC board should increase the number of members (the agency bylaws now cap the number of board members at fifteen, and it appears there are currently thirteen members). He also suggested that the board "needs to recruit people who actually have expertise in some of the things we need, such as city planners who actually live in Hudson." It's hard not to think that DePietro may have had someone in particular in mind: Matthew Frederick.

DePietro and Ellen Thurston interviewed Frederick about his latest book and his ideas for Hudson on their WGXC radio show a few weeks ago. Frederick's new book is called 101 Things I Learned in Urban Design School, and tomorrow night at 6 p.m., Frederick will draw on the principles from the book, in a presentation titled Future of Hudson: An Urban Designer's Imaginings, What Ifs, and Why Nots, to explore "how we might repair Hudson's trouble spots and shape its future." Among the ideas for the future are "a redesigned waterfront, a rethought Second Ward, a revamped Seventh Street Park, a new home for Kite's Nest, and even a dramatic new neighborhood with its own Main Street."

A discussion and book signing will follow the presentation. If you can't make it to the library tomorrow at 6 p.m., you won't miss out entirely. Dan Udell has announced his intention to videotape the event.

Watch for Yourself

Dan Udell's video of yesterday's HDC meeting is now available on YouTube. Click here to watch it.

From left to right: Sheena Salvino, Matt Griesemer. Don Moore, Kristal Heinz  

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

High Noon at HDC

At noon today, the Hudson Development Corporation held its first meeting since Common Council president Tom DePietro called HDC "a quasi-agency that is outdated and should probably no longer exist" and asked city attorney Andy Howard to "look into how does one get rid of an LDC." The HDC board was clearly prepared for a crowd. Tables and chairs had been arranged to accommodate spectators.      

HDC board president John Gilstrap, who had responded to DePietro with a memo that DePietro claimed "begins with a false statement and compounds its errors throughout," was not present at the meeting, owing to a "medical emergency." Instead, Don Moore, treasurer of the HDC board, chaired the meeting. His tone was calm and conciliatory. He started out by addressing the issue of FOIL (Freedom of Information Law) and HDC, thanking Sam Pratt and announcing that Pratt's FOIL request would be honored. Moore explained that Pratt's was the first FOIL request HDC had ever received. Matt Griesemer, attorney for HDC, said they had intended to seek an opinion from the New York State Committee on Open Government, but Pratt had done so first. Seeming to suggest the issue was still open to interpretation, Griesemer said they had decided to take the position that HDC is subject to FOIL. 

"HCDPA Financial Insolvency" appeared on the agenda under "FINANCIAL REPORTS," and DePietro, an ex officio member of the board, queried: "Why is this board talking about HCDPA? You're just trying to scare people." DePietro had expressed the opinion, in his email to Gilstrap, that "a strengthened HCDPA is in order." Sheena Salvino, executive director of HDC and HCDPA, explained that it was an issue for HDC because the agencies shared staff, and if HCDPA was insolvent, HDC would have to assume the entire financial burden of those salaries.

Five items into a seven-item agenda, the meeting got to the topic most people were there to discuss: the redevelopment of the Kaz site. Moore explained what we already knew: the project is on hold. "We cannot proceed without having the City with us," Moore stated.

DePietro asked if there was "a willingness to reconsider the RFP" and suggested "starting over" and "not having one developer." Moore denied that there was anything in the RFP that specified one developer, but DePietro responded, "I felt that the RFP determined it, and that process [the process of drafting the RFP] was not open." Moore responded that policy initiatives being talked about, before and during the DRI (Downtown Revitaliation Intitiative) process, such as affordable housing, job creation, food availability, community walkability, had been incorporated into the RFP. 

HDC board member Kristal Heinz, who had earlier spoken of "misperceptions" that the Kaz project was being rushed through when in fact the board had been working on it for two and a half years, addressed DePietro directly, calling him to task for being on the board for four months and never bringing up any concerns and then saying publicly, at a Common Council meeting over which he presided, that he didn't think the agency was "viable" and that it "shouldn't exist." She called it "a breach of loyalty to HDC." DePietro questioned the notion that he was required to have loyalty to HDC, saying that had not signed some of the documents he was expected to when becoming a member of the board. He told Heinz that his criticism "wasn't personal" even though she was "making it personal."

When Moore sought guidance on how to move forward, Mayor Rick Rector observed that the conversation "started with concern about the Kaz project and exploded into concern about HDC." He reminded those present that HDC was a 501(c)3 not-for-profit agency and could do things that City by law could not, that HDC was currently the City's only mechanism for planning and economic development, and that HDC possessed institutional memory that City government, with elected officials potentially changing every two years, did not. He stressed that the investment in Hudson from the DRI--$20 million--was "the biggest infusion of cash since Urban Renewal." He concluded by saying, "Kaz we can reevaluate, but we need to take a deep breath before considering dissolving HDC. It is the only apparatus we have to deal with the DRI."

Much more was said, by members of the board and members of the audience. When Dan Udell's video of the meeting is available, all will be revealed. The outcomes of the meeting seem to be that HDC board meetings may be held in the evening when more people are able to attend and a working group representing the City and HDC may be formed to reassess the Kaz project. 

Of interest is that DePietro, at some point in the discussion, said he was "shocked that the [HDC] board is taking this so personally," stressed that his statements were meant to be "the beginning of a conversation," and asserted, "The fact that the board cannot respond to it [in this spirit] is disappointing." Dan Udell's video of the informal Common Council meeting allows people to judge for themselves if members of the HDC board overreacted to the statements made by DePietro or not. One is reminded, though, that, after the resolution demanding the mayor remove the current members of the Hudson Housing Authority Board of Commissioners failed, DePietro told its author, Alderman Tiffany Garriga, "The resolution has already accomplished much of what it was intended to do. We have put them on notice." Is this to be the new strategy for achieving desired outcomes--proposing ill-considered resolutions and making provocative statements in the Council Chamber at City Hall?

Happening Right Now

Right now--from 5 to 7 p.m. today--there's a community listening session going on at Bliss Towers about a new mobile grocery store being planned for Hudson. 

If you miss out today, you get another chance on Tuesday, June 19, from 5 to 8 p.m., when the conversation continues at the Hudson Area Library. 

The Previous Life of the House Now Gone

Since discovering on Sunday that 13 Worth Avenue had been demolished, I've learned more about the house's recent past and its more distant past. People living in the neighborhood say the house has been vacant since 2005. Tax records confirm that it was the victim of a bank foreclosure and had become what is known as a "zombie house." 

The demolition took place on Wednesday, May 16. Neighbors speculate that the unfounded rumor Worth Avenue was to become a historic district caused the owner to accelerate plans for razing the building. Craig Haigh, code enforcement officer, thinks if he did speed up his plans it was because the house was "racking up code violations." A new house is to be constructed in the footprint of the original house. Some sources say it will something modern with "lots of glass." Whatever is to be, I set out to discover what I could about the history of the house that came to such a regrettable end. Here's what I've learned so far.

The house does not appear on the 1873 Beers Atlas map (reproduced above), but the City of Hudson tap records indicate that 13 Worth Avenue was hooked up to the city water supply on October 23, 1875. At that time the house, which apparently had only recently been built, was owned by Mary A. McKinstry, or Mary Ann McKinstry. With invaluable help from Ruth Piwonka, I found that Mary Ann McKinstry, who was born in 1802, was the niece of Robert McKinstry. Robert and his wife, Sally, lived in the house at Union and Seventh streets that became the Home for the Aged.

Sally McKinstry was the founder of the Hudson Orphan Asylum, and Robert served in many civic capacities, among them mayor of Hudson from 1837 to 1838 and throughout his life as a trustee of the Universalist Society. Sally died in 1862, Robert in 1870. In his will, Robert left an annuity of $75 to "my niece Mary Ann McKinstry daughter of my brother John McKinstry decreased during her natural life."

An ad for an auction, which appeared in the Hudson Daily Star for April 24, 1874, is the earliest evidence I've found linking Mary Ann McKinstry with 13 Worth Avenue.

It's not known whose belongings she was selling. Perhaps, at the age of 72, she had moved into the new and relatively small house on Worth Avenue from a larger house and was doing what today we would call down-sizing.

Mary Ann McKinstry died on July 5, 1879. In her will, she left the house and all its contents to her sister Eliza Decker and Eliza's daughter Helen Miller. Both mother and daughter appear to have been widows at the time.

Interestingly, Augustus McKinstry, Robert McKinstry's nephew who was his executor and heir, was also the executor of his cousin Mary Ann's will.  

Eliza Decker and Helen Miller seem never to have lived in the house. The census for 1880 shows them living at 15 South Fifth Street. The census for that year indicates the residents of 13 Worth Avenue were Mathias Milham, his wife, Emily, and their son Harrold. Milham, whose occupation according to the 1880 census was "Clerk in Store," likely did not own the house. Two years later, in 1882, the Hudson city directory lists Milham, now a partner in a shoe store at 291 Warren Street called Leggett & Milham, living at 415 Warren Street. (These building numbers were before the numbering system changed. Today, 291 Warren Street is 535, and 415 Warren Street in 813.) 

In September 1888, another ad for an auction at 13 Worth Avenue appeared in the Hudson Evening Register. Who was living in the house at the time is not known.

In the beginning of the 20th century, the house was owned by Seymour Vincent. The Hudson city directory for 1901 lists Vincent's occupation as "fresco painter." Ads such as the one below, which appeared in the Hudson Evening Register in May 1911, as well as census records, reveal that Vincent was a house painter.

Seymour Vincent and his wife, Maria, lived at 13 Worth Avenue with their six children throughout the first two decades of the 20th century. In July 1914, the Evening Register reported that their youngest son Lee, then 15, was "spending his vacation at Apple Tree Villa in South Cairo." In November 1916, the Columbia Republican reported that the Dutch Reformed Church was planning a weekend of revival meetings to be preceded by "several neighborhood prayer meetings." One of those prayer meetings was to be held "at the home of Mrs. Vincent, 13 Worth avenue."

Seymour Vincent died in April 1921. Maria Vincent died on Christmas Day 1924. What happened next for the house is not known, but in December 1937, the Kinderhook Advertiser reported that 13 Worth Avenue had been purchased at auction by Melvin W. Simmons, the "former Cemetery Commissioner." Simmons, who lived at 40 Worth Avenue, apparently bought the house as an investment property. 

In February 1942, the Evening Register reported that a daughter had been born to Mr. and Mrs. Donald Smith of 13 Worth Avenue. On April 20, 1944, the Hudson Register reported that eleven men who had been classified 2-B by the local draft board had been reclassified 1-A. One of those men was Raymond John Steliz of 13 Worth Avenue.

The last reference to 13 Worth Avenue discovered in old newspapers is a report from the Chatham Courier for July 17, 1951, that Alice Brenzel, wife of deputy sheriff Arthur Brenzel, who resided at 13 Worth Avenue, was to be the matron at the Columbia County jail.


Who'd a Thunk It?

Here's something you don't see very often: two almost identical brown Smart cars parked on the same block in Hudson. (The Gossipsmobile is the one with the New York plates. The doppelganger has New Jersey plates.)


Monday, May 21, 2018

Grand Opening This Morning

Although The Wick has been providing lodging and dining for a few months now, and its little electric vehicle has been seen on Warren Street for the past few weeks shuttling guests to restaurants and other locations, the hotel's official grand opening took place this morning. Dignitaries were on hand to congratulate the Redburn Development partners, Tom Rossi and John Blackburn, on their successful restoration and adaptive reuse of the mid-19th century industrial building that started life as a candle and soap manufactory. First, there were the speeches; then, there was the ribbon cutting.

From left to right: Assemblymember Didi Barrett; Daniel Mackay, deputy commissioner for historic preservation, NYS OPRHP; Mike Yevoli, regional president for Empire State Development's Capital Region; Rick Rector, mayor of Hudson; Jeff Hunt, president and CEO, Columbia County Chamber of Commerce; Blackburn and Rossi, Redburn Development; Congressman John Faso; Mike Tucker, president and CEO, Columbia Economic Development Corporation, is at the lectern  

When the ceremony was over and people headed into the lobby for refreshments, I decided to snap a picture of this: a discreet plaque beside the door that marks The Wick as a Tribute Portfolio hotel.

Some people insist on calling The Wick a "chain hotel" because of this designation, conjuring up visions of garish formula signage--maybe even neon--but this is it.

For those of us old enough to remember, it's a little like the Duncan Hines plaques that marked for travelers restaurants where you could get a decent meal back in the 1950s, before there were such things as national chains.

Sunday, May 20, 2018

The Great War: May 21, 1918

Last week, Gossips published a letter from Corporal John Cannon, written in the trenches on April 10, 1918. The letter had appeared in the Columbia Republican on May 14, 1918. Another letter was received from Corporal Cannon on Saturday, May 18, and apparently shared with the Columbia Republican, as the previous one had been. The content of that letter was reported on May 21, 1918, and Gossips shares it now. 

Charles McDonald's family lived at 64 Worth Avenue. His father owned a tobacco shop at 703 Warren Street.

John Malone's family lived at 41 North Seventh Street, in a house that no longer exists. The building that is now the location of Bagel Tyme occupies the lot where, a hundred years ago, the Malone home stood.

The Columbia Republican doesn't identify Joseph O'Connell's parents. There is only one O'Connell listed in the Hudson city directory for 1918: Daniel O'Connell, whose occupation is given as "station agent" and whose home address is 23 Allen Street.


Another One Bites the Dust

Despite Hudson's alleged commitment to historic preservation and the oft lamented shortage of housing for people who want to live here, buildings keep getting demolished. Last year, this house at 13 Worth Avenue was being advertised on Zillow as a "fixer upper." Asking price: $65,806.

This afternoon, I was surprised to discover that the house is no more.

Assessment records indicate that the house was sold on May 26, 2017, for $39,500. The prior owner was Wells Fargo Bank, suggesting that the house may have been foreclosed on. 

No buildings on Worth Avenue are included in any historic district, so there was nothing to prohibit the new owner of 13 Worth Avenue from demolishing it. By the same token, if something new is to be built on the lot, there will be no review of the design of the new construction for appropriateness or visual compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood.

Saturday, May 19, 2018

More Tsuris for the Embattled HDC

Reading Hudson's Downtown Revitalization Initiative (DRI) application last year, many were surprised by some language contained therein--in particular, these statements about A. Colarusso & Sons and its operations on the waterfront: "city officials and neighboring business owners support the expansion of Colarusso (page 18); "Key improvement to be considered . . . reduction of truck traffic through residential areas of the BRIDGE District by re-routing Colarusso trucks onto a widened two-way haul road at the City's south border" (page 47); "On any given fair weather Saturday, brides in their gowns might pose for photos at Basilica Hudson, while just outside gravel is delivered by truck from the Colarusso quarry to the deep water port across Front Street" (page 37).

It's been something of a mystery how and why this language got into the document, and a few weeks ago, on April 20, Sam Pratt submitted a FOIL (Freedom of Information Law) request to the Hudson Development Corporation (HDC) for "records created between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2017 which mention, discuss, originate from, or otherwise concern the A. Colarusso & Son company ('Colarusso')." At the HDC board meeting on April 24, the FOIL request was accepted as a communication. Sheena Salvino, executive director for HDC, commented that "all communication relating to Colarusso" would be emails about the DRI application "as it went back and forth" and told the board she was seeking the advice of the HDC attorney to find out what they were obligated to provide.

Pratt reports what has happened since then in a post published yesterday on his blog: "State: Yes, the Freedom of Information Law applies to that Hudson agency." 

City Funding for Events

For the past several years, it has been an annual ritual. The Common Council Arts, Entertainment & Tourism Committee, at its regular May meeting, would parcel out a sum of money, usually about $20,000, earmarked in the City budget for festivals and events. Late last summer, the AET Committee, agonizing over the possibility that the City might be using taxpayer money to support events and festivals that interfered with commercial activity on Warren Street rather than promoting the city, proposed using the $20,000 to produce one event: Hudson Community Day. That idea was not well received--either by the sponsors of important Hudson events or by representatives of the business community. In the end, it was decided that the AET Committee would go back to distributing the $20,000 as it had in the past, and $20,000 was written into the 2018 budget, although the AET Committee still fussed about the process of determining who got the money and assessing the positive impact of the events supported by the City.

Photo: Albert Gnidica
At the beginning of 2018, Common Council president Tom DePietro abolished the Arts, Entertainment & Tourism Committee, and it wasn't immediately clear how or if the money would be distributed. But in April, DePietro announced that the money would be awarded by the Finance Committee--it's money, after all. Earlier this week, Rob Bujan, chair of the Finance Committee, published the guidelines for applying for financial assistance and announced that applications are due on June 15.

Photo: Sarah Sterling

The criteria for applying are introduced with this statement: "The City of Hudson grants financial assistance to events that have an impact on the economic & social fabric of Our City. So, no matter how small or large, if your event has a positive effect on the whole City of Hudson, we encourage you to apply!" 

Applicants for funding must be city residents, and events cannot charge admission fees. A mass gathering permit is required before applying for funding. Applications must include the event budget (income and expenses), and funded events are required to submit a post-event report. The application must address the following questions:
  1. Why do you think the City should sponsor your event?
  2. What does your event contribute to the city?
  3. How will you let people know about your event?
  4. Who else is helping to fund your event?
  5. Have you produced events in the past?
  6. Based on your previous events, or your projections for the event you are planning, can you estimate the size of your audience?
For the complete guidelines and instructions for submitting applications, which are due on June 15, 2018, click here.

How Trendy Is That?

Earlier this week, Newsday ran an article about Hudson, with the lede, "Just when you thought Hudson, New York, could not get any more trendy--well, it does." Our trendiness even got us mentioned this week on the Showtime series Billions. At a Land Rover dealership in Manhattan, billionaire hedge fund manager Bobby Axelrod offers to buy his CIO Taylor Mason a vintage Land Rover, saying "You'll look good in it up in Hudson on weekends."


Thanks to Neal Van Deusen for bringing this to our attention and providing the screen capture

The Early Bird Gets the Asparagus . . .

and the chance to be part of the ribbon cutting marking the opening of the Hudson Farmers Market for its 21st season! 

Although the Hudson Farmers Market has been open on the corner of Columbia and Sixth streets for a few weeks now, today is the OFFICIAL opening for the season. The event begins at 9:30--just after it's expected to start raining. So, grab an umbrella, show your mettle, and get to the market early. You can be part of the annual group photo of the market's vendors and loyal patrons.