Friday, January 18, 2019

An Evening with the Hudson Housing Authority

Last evening, the Hudson Housing Authority Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to enter into a Master Development Agreement (MDA) with PRC (Property Resources Corporation) and Duvernay + BrooksDan Hubbell, the "Mixed Finance Development Legal Counsel" for HHA, explained that the MDA "governs the terms and conditions of exploring and moving forward with the project," but it does not "commit the board to a specific design."

The project HHA is proposing was the topic of two meetings last evening: the special meeting of the HHA to vote on the MDA, which took place at 5:00, and the Common Council Economic Development Committee meeting, which started at 6:00. Gossips will not report everything that was said in chronological order. Instead, the focus will be on main themes.

During the first meeting, the public was ejected from the room so the HHA board could go into executive session. Amazingly, Dan Udell, who was there to videotape the meeting, was asked to remove his camera, which he had left in room, the implication being, it seems, that he might have set the camera to continue recording during the executive session. While the public was waiting in the lobby, I spoke with Ifetayo Cobbins, a resident of Bliss Towers, who repeated a complaint Luisa Burgos-Thillet, also a resident, had made earlier: notice of the meeting was not posted in the building until that afternoon. Cobbins suggested the actions of the board seemed "underhanded" and "kind of fishy" and wondered what the board had to hide. It may not be the case that the HHA board is hiding anything, but their story seems to be ever changing.

Last week, the income limits for the 40 units in the "family" building were defined as being between 50 and 65 percent of the AMI (area median income). Last evening, the spread was said to be from 50 to 70 percent. According to Hubbell, 11 of the units will designated for households with incomes of 50 percent of the AMI, 12 for 60 percent, and 17 for 70 percent. A handout distributed at the Economic Development Committee meeting charted the targeted income limits by apartment size.

In the past, the public was led to believe that all residents in Bliss Towers and the two proposed new buildings would be Section 8. Last night, it was explained residents in Bliss Towers would be a RAD type of Section 8; residents of the proposed senior building would be Section 8 with an income limit of 30 percent of the AMI; the "family building" would not be Section 8 but income restricted workforce housing.

A major concern voiced by the public is that the project is out of scale and does not meet the housing needs of Hudson as defined in the city's Strategic Housing Action Plan. Mayor Rick Rector has expressed the opinion that the SHAP "is in almost complete contradiction to what is being proposed." That opinion was echoed last night by former Third Ward alderman John Friedman. Friedman said the project "seems to have metastasized," saying that it contradicted the city's housing study, and asked of the HHA board, "Have you considered how this will impact the rest of the city?"

In her criticism of the project, Mary Ann Gazzola has repeatedly called the project out of scale and too big for the city, maintaining that the project is addressing a regional housing problem not the housing needs that exist in Hudson. At the Economic Development Committee meeting, she noted that there were already 600 units of subsidized housing in Hudson, a city of about 6,300, all confined to the same area of the city. This project would add to that density. In the same vein, Alderman John Rosenthal (Fourth Ward) remarked that the SHAP "does not envision a greater concentration [of subsidized housing] in the same area."

Hubbell and Brian Heeger of Duvernay + Brooks, who addressed the Economic Development Committee last evening, maintain that the project is consistent with city's Strategic Housing Action Plan and meets the goals of HUD. Hubbell did concede that the project was based on "what HHA has identified as the need" and "what we think can be financed by the state." When asked by Gazzola if there was a way "to fix the high rise, fix the low rise, and build something to scale," Heeber admitted "at a certain point, the scale becomes too small, and it loses its competitiveness"--competitiveness for funding, that is.

Another concern was fiscal strain the proposed project would put on the city. Because it is a federal housing project, the new buildings will be exempt from real property tax. Matthew Frederick noted the project would be "seventy-six households needing city services but not paying seventy-six households' worth of property taxes." There will be a PILOT (payment in lieu of taxes), which is yet to be negotiated, but Gazzola pointed out that the PILOT paid by Bliss Towers is $50,000 a year, whereas many homeowners in Hudson are paying between $10,000 and $15,000 a year in property taxes--a situation she called "woefully out of proportion."

Those representing the project were caught in an inconsistency last night. Despite criticism from members of the community that this project addresses a regional need not a local need, HHA and the developers have maintained that it will serve people already living in Hudson who are currently "rent burdened." Last night, when trying to make the case for the economic benefit of the proposed project, Heeger told the Economic Development Committee that the residents of the new buildings would bring $3 million in spending into the local economy. The sophistry of that statement was pointed out by an audience member, Sorche Fairbank, who asked, "If the people who are going to live in the buildings are already in Hudson, where is the $3 million coming from?"

The project requires site plan approval from the Planning Board, which in its review will be weighing the impacts on the environment and the city. The project also requires the approval of the Common Council. The next meeting at which the project will be discussed is the meeting of the Common Council Housing and Transportation Committee, which takes place on Wednesday, February 6, at 6:45 p.m. at City Hall.

Thursday, January 17, 2019

Intel from the ZBA

Last night, two projects came before the Zoning Board of Appeals seeking variances for parking. A bit of necessary background: Hudson's current zoning code requires one offstreet parking space for every three seats in an eating and drinking establishment. Neither project will have any offstreet parking for its patrons.

The first project seeking a variance for parking spaces is the restoration of the historic firehouse on Park Place.

It turns out the plan for the commercial space--the ground floor and the cellar--is to create a marketplace and tasting room for New York State craft breweries, wineries, and distilleries. 

The second project needing a variance for parking is a new restaurant soon to open at 260 Warren Street, the building owned by the Galvan Foundation at the corner of Warren and Third streets which has been vacant for more than a decade.

The restaurant will have a total of 90 seats--62 inside the building and 28 in a fenced courtyard behind the building on Prison Alley. (At its meeting on January 11, the Historic Preservation Commission voted to grant a certificate of appropriateness for the fence, which will painted wood, six feet high, surmounted by two feet of open lattice.) 

The ZBA will hold public hearings for both projects on Wednesday, February 20, beginning at 6:00 p.m. in City Hall. 

Land for Sale on Columbia Street

Yesterday, Gossips reported on the demolition of 249-251 Columbia Street and quoted a reader as saying, "What was probably the most blighted block in the city is beginning to see a lot of investment." Anyone who wants to be a part of the transformation of the block, whatever that may bring, has the opportunity to do so by acquiring one of two vacant lots being sold by Hudson Community Development and Planning Agency (HCDPA).   

The first is 202-206 Columbia Street--what's left of what was once a vibrant community garden.

In 2013, HCDPA sold half of the garden to Habitat of Humanity to build two more of their passive houses. In 2016, HCDPA announced that it was accepting sealed bids for the remaining half of the property "for the construction of low to moderate income housing and/or uses compatible with the Urban Renewal Plan"--a plan adopted in the 1970s. That effort did not result in the sale of the property, and now HCDPA is trying again. The HCDPA website announces that the agency is "requesting proposals from qualified developers, firms, or individuals who have demonstrated commensurate experience and expertise for residential housing development projects for the sale and development of three adjacent parcels on Columbia Street in Hudson, NY." The guidelines for submitting a proposal can be found here. The deadline for submitting proposals is noon on Thursday, February 14.

There is also this lot at 238 Columbia Street. (Sadly, the majestic tree on this lot is no longer there.)

HCDPA tried to sell this lot last fall, but there were no responses to the call for sealed bids. Now the agency is trying again. Sealed bids for the property are requested, to be submitted by 1:00 p.m. on February 14. Click here for the bid package. The bids, if any are received, will be opened and read aloud at the next scheduled meeting of the HCDPA board, which takes place at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 14. 

Of Access, Certification, and Gestures

Dan Udell's video of Tuesday's Common Council meeting is now available on YouTube.

The presentation on Complete Streets begins at 22:51; the presentation on becoming a Certified Climate Smart Community begins at 36:50; the discussion that resulted in the portraits of elected officials being removed from the mantelpiece begins at 50:24.

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

The Polar Plunge Returns!

Next month, on Saturday, February 23, the Polar Plunge at Oakdale Lake returns for its second year. Last year, the event raised more than $10,000 for the Hudson Youth Department and Hudson Fire Department Water Rescue and Dive Team. This year's goal is $15,000.

Girlgantua Jones, a.k.a Justin Weaver, at last year's Polar Plunge
If you're up for taking the plunge into the icy cold, invigorating water of Oakdale Lake, you can register as an individual or persuade your friends to join you and form a team. The entry fee is $25 a person. Once you've entered, you can get your family, friends, and co-workers to sponsor your plunge. All the information you need to become a plunger or to sponsor a plunger can be found by clicking here.

This year, something new has been added to the event: the Great Chili Cook-Off. The plungers start hitting the water at noon, and soon after the last brave soul scampers back out of the lake, the Great Chili Cook-Off begins at the Central Fire Station, 77 North Seventh Street. If you make chili that gets rave reviews, and you want to increase its fan base, consider providing a pot of it for the Great Chili Cook-Off. Information on doing so is also available here

A Bit of Political Pedantry

Two women with not garden variety first names are among the presidential wannabes in the Democratic party: Kirsten Gillibrand and Kamala Harris. Since their names will be mentioned often in the coming months, it would nice if those speaking of them would pronounce their names correctly.

First, Kirsten Gillibrand. The first syllable of Kirsten does not sound like cur. Instead, it rhymes with ear and clear and near. To hear it pronounced correctly, click here

Then there's Kamala Harris. Kamala does not rhyme with Pamela. The first syllable of Kamala, as do all the syllables, rhymes with baa and spa and rah. To hear it pronounced correctly, by Kamala Harris herself if you watch long enough, click here.  

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

No More Portraits on the Mantel

Back in April, Gossips reported the sudden appearance of a portrait of Donald Trump in the center of the pictures of our representatives in state and federal government on the mantelpiece in the Council Chamber at City Hall: "New Face in City Hall."

Tonight, at the suggestion of Alderman Tiffany Garriga (Second Ward), the Common Council decided that the portrait of Trump--and indeed all the portraits--would no longer be displayed. Amanda Purcell reports exactly what transpired on HudsonValley360: "In symbolic gesture, Common Council removes Trump photo from fireplace mantel."


Oakdale: Memories and Aspirations

On HudsonValley360 today, Amanda Purcell has a story about Oakdale and the plans to revitalize it: "Oakdale volunteers whittle down project list." Essentially, she's reporting the same information that was presented to the public on December 11 and reported by Gossips the next day: "Eight Ideas for Oakdale." What Purcell doesn't mention is an Oakdale event coming up next month, on Thursday, February 7, at the Hudson Area Library: the opening reception for an exhibition called "Oakdale: Past & Future."

Oakdale Lake, June 1963
The exhibition, the collaborative creation of Friends of Oakdale Lake, Friends of Hudson Youth, the Hudson Area Library, Columbia University's Hudson Valley Initiative, and the City of Hudson Youth Department's "Oakdale campers," includes historic photographs of Oakdale, maps from early Oakdale Lake plans (it is a human-engineered lake, after all), a history of Hudson's relationship with the lake, environmental projects by Oakdale campers, and the Hudson Valley Initiative team's final design concept for Oakdale, refined based on the input from the public meeting on December 11.

HVI's findings will be presented in a short video to be screened at the exhibition opening. Attendees can discuss and augment the concepts. There will be design images for people to take hone and "mobilize around." Speaking of the eight design ideas, Kaja KΓΌhl, director of the HVI program, explained, "Each can be pursued individually and at different timelines. Together they provide a vision for Oakdale as a destination for all."

The event takes place from 6 to 8 p.m. on Thursday, February 7, in the Community Room of the Hudson Area Library, 51 North Fifth Street. People are encouraged to bring copies of photographs of themselves, their friends and family at Oakdale. These will be placed on a community board that will become part of the exhibition, which will be on display at the library through the month of March.

Happening Right Now on Columbia Street

At this moment, these two houses--really a double house--at 251 and 249 Columbia Street are being demolished.

The two houses have been sad and abandoned for a while now. They were often mentioned back in 2010 as a potential location for scattered site housing, when there was talk of replacing Bliss Towers. The tax rolls indicate they were acquired by a new owner in March 2017. Now they are being demolished.

Recently, the two houses across the street, at 248 and 250 Columbia, were demolished to make way for a pair of new multiple unit houses.

According to a Gossips source, close to 75 percent of the properties on the south side of the 200 block of Columbia Street have changed ownership in the last year or so. To quote that source, "What was probably the most blighted block in the city is beginning to see a lot of investment." It remains to be seen what that investment will bring.

At Tonight's Common Council Meeting

Gossips has received word that at the Common Council meeting tonight, which begins at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, Rebecca Polmateer from Cornell Cooperative Extension will be making a presentation about Complete Streets

New York State passed the Complete Streets Act in 2011. The NYS Department of Transportation defines a Complete Street in this way:
A Complete Street is a roadway planned and designed to consider the safe, convenient access and mobility of all roadway users of all ages and abilities. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation riders, and motorists; it includes children, the elderly, and persons with disabilities.
Complete Street roadway design features include sidewalks, lane striping, bicycle lanes, paved shoulders suitable to use by bicyclists, signage, crosswalks, pedestrian control signals, bus pull-outs, curb cuts, raised crosswalks, ramps and traffic calming measures.
The Before and After pictures below were taken from the New York State Complete Streets Report, published in February 2014. They show the transformation of a street in Great Neck, Long Island, from a two-lane one-way road into a two-lane two-way road with Complete Streets enhancements--"a new aesthetic, easier and safer crossing for pedestrians, and a number of traffic calming measures."

The lion's share of Hudson's $10 million in Downtown Revitalization Initiative (DRI) money--a little less than $4 million--will go toward implementing Complete Streets improvements in the area of the city below Second Street, "to provide safe access, aesthetic improvement, and separation of truck traffic from pedestrians and bicyclists." 

Monday, January 14, 2019

Why We Have Historic Districts

On Friday, Linda Mackey and Daniel McEneny from the Community Engagement Unit of the New York State Historic Preservation Office came to Hudson to talk with our Historic Preservation Commission about Hudson becoming a Certified Local Government, a program whose benefits include being able to compete for federal funds, technical training for the commission, and formal recognition by state and federal government. Their PowerPoint presentation concluded with this visual reminder of the importance of designated historic districts and the preservation ordinances that protect them.


Mark Your Calendars

If you live on the south side of Hudson, you will have a chance to "hear from your elected officials--aldermen Kamal Johnson and Rob Bujan and supervisor Sarah Sterling--on what's been accomplished in 2018" and to "discuss our goals for 2019" at an event that's being called "1st Ward Meet & Greet." It takes place on Thursday, January 31, from 6 to 7 p.m., at the Chamber of Commerce, 1 North Front Street. There's even a Facebook event page to let it be known you plan to attend.  


Conflict Over the Third Wednesday of the Month

For decades, the Zoning Board of Appeals met on the third Wednesday of the month, the Common Council Public Works Committee met on the fourth Wednesday of the month, and all was well.

At the beginning of last year, Alderman Eileen Halloran (Fifth Ward), who chairs the committee now called Public Works and Parks, decided, for her own reasons, to move the committee meeting to the third Wednesday of the month--the same night as the ZBA meeting. Last year, the PW&P Committee met at 5:15 p.m. and the ZBA at 6:00 p.m. At the beginning of the year, when both meetings were taking place at City Hall, the back-to-back meetings were problematic. Forty-five minutes didn't seem enough for the PW&P Committee. Audience members who wanted to ask questions of DPW superintendent Rob Perry weren't able to because the time was up and the members of the ZBA were in the wings, ready to take their positions on the dais, as were applicants for zoning variances. When the PW&P Committee moved its meeting to the Central Firehouse at mid-year, having both meetings on the third Wednesday was a problem only for those who wanted to attend both meetings, but this year it seems, since Alderman Tiffany Garriga (Second Ward) is ambulatory again, all Council meetings will be back at City Hall.

At the informal meeting of the Common Council last Monday, Halloran announced her intention to schedule the PW&P Committee meeting for the third Wednesday of the month from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m., asserting that the city clerk had told her the room in City Hall was the Council Chamber and Council business should take precedence. The ZBA, said Halloran, would have to change its meeting time to 6:30 p.m. The listing for Wednesday, January 16, in the post "Meetings of Interest in the Week Ahead" was originally based on that information. 

It turns out, the ZBA will not be moved. It will continue to meet at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall on the third Wednesday of the month, as it has for decades. The Public Works and Parks Committee will meet at 5:15 p.m. at City Hall on the third Wednesday of the month, unless it decides to move back to the fourth Wednesday of the month, which was its traditional meeting day.

HDC Seeks New Board Members

After the crisis last May that led to the resignation of four board members as well as its counsel, the departure in early August of executive director Sheena Salvino, and the resignation, effective at the end December, of board president John Gilstrap, one may well wonder what's happening with HDC (Hudson Development Corporation). The answer is it's looking to rebuild the board. The following announcement was released on Saturday:
The Hudson Development Corporation has begun the process of seeking applicants for board membership. Board Secretary Christine Jones is chairing the nominating committee. Serving on the committee with Christine are Nick Haddad, Gregg Carey, and Carolyn Lawrence. The culmination of their work will be reported to the HDC Board at the group's annual meeting on March 26 of this year.
There will be three board vacancies to be filled as well as a slate of officers (President, Vice President, Treasurer, and Secretary) for the coming year.
Board members serve a three-year term with a two-term limit and must be a resident or have business interest in the city of Hudson.
Interested parties wanting to be considered for board membership will find an application HERE. The completed application along with a letter of interest should be sent to the nominating committee at  
Information about the HDC may be found at

Columbia County's Sleeping Dragon: Part VII

The following article, which appeared in The Independent for August 18, 1988, is the continuation of Margaret Schram's account of the dramatic and tragic landslide that occurred in Greenport in the summer of 1915.

Section 2 The Knickerbocker Cement Plant Tragedy, August 2, 1915
As well as the five men killed, seven others were injured in the August 2, 1915, landslide. One employee was hospitalized with severe burns, three others with some burns, and three had only slight injuries. If the slide had occurred during a shift when all the men were in place, rather than at the change of shifts, the death and injured toll would have been much higher.
One of those who escaped from the power plant reported that when he went in investigate the sound of a steam pipe breaking, he discovered the walls crumbling. Dashing outside, he had to leap over wide cracks in the ground, up to 30 feet deep.
Creek Bed Lifted 20' 
There was another serious problem. The creek bed had been lifted up nearly 20 feet and carried some distance. This movement happened so rapidly that some fish were left high and dry. Then the loose clay and soil, including blocks of earth, moved into the creek, damming it entirely. This dam caused trouble for the knitting mills on the creek to the north of Stockport. They had to suspend operations until the flow of water was restored.
On the southern side, the creek backed up, and the rising water overflowed the fields and covered the bridge. During the morning, workers using dynamite attempted to cut a ditch through the debris. Trees had to be cut away and their roots dynamited out to make the channel.
Torrential Rains 
To add to the confusion, the rains began again, incessantly and at times torrential, for the whole week. The creek waters rose over the dam of debris, but the current widened the channel. 
In one of the barns, the company's chauffeur had been cranking up the company touring car when the barn tipped and the car slid out of the barn and into the hollow, while the chauffeur was tilted to a 45-degree angle. One of the first things retrieved was the car, found to be in perfect running order with minor damage to the chassis.
Hudsonians were thankful that the slide had not traveled in the other direction, where the underground waterline to the city lay 101 feet away. Had the pipe broken, the water from the two reservoirs and the Churchtown dam would have emptied into the area. If the slide had occurred 10 minutes later, the B. and A. Railroad switch line would have been on the tracks.
Streams of Spectators
The highways were soon filled with streams of people hurrying to the disaster. By 6 a.m. that morning rumors had spread through Hudson that 30 men had been killed; that dynamite had exploded and the entire plant destroyed; never less than 25 men had met their death. The roadway was blocked with spectators all day and night. Fearing another slide, plant authorities placed guards along the perimeter of the plant with orders that no one could enter without a permit.
The landslide and the resulting loss of power left the 400 men employed at the plant without jobs. Plant managers announced that the men would be used for cleanup and rebuilding. Tons of cement stored in the toppled pack house were covered with canvas to save as much as possible.

  Working 24 Hours/Day
The Albany Southern Railway Company provided enough power, by adding by cables, to keep the main plant in operation. Working 24 hours a day, 200 employees cleared the wreckage and built a new power plant. The ground slid slightly again on Wednesday, but that was attributed to the earth settling because of the heavy rains. The 100-foot chimney of the power plant, partially disintegrated by its collapse, had to be broken up by hand.
The new power plant was being constructed near the main buildings, on the same firm shale foundation. A portion of the 40,000 tons of crushed stone was used in its foundation. Six boilers and two large turbines were removed nearly intact from the wrecked power house and installed in the new one.
A new pumping station was built next to the creek, and a 30-inch line carrying 3,400 gallons of water a minute led to the new power house and the other buildings.
Righted the Barn
The barn, left at a 45-degree angle, was righted and propped up by supports. The sheer banks left by the slide were graded; the deep depressions were filled with earth dug for the foundations of the new power house. Authorities expected the plant to be back in order and functioning normally by the first of November.
The county coroner held an inquest and workers and managers testified. The state geologist, still making test borings at the site, gave his testimony. It was his opinion that the heavy rains of the past month saturated the clay "formed in the lake which existed under the site in prehistoric times." He believed that most of this water came from the hill across the highway. "The weight of the overlying material forced a squeezing-out of this liquid stratum until the plastic mass formed an outlet to the Claverack Creek."
The coroner pronounced that "the catastrophe was a result of natural phenomena absolutely unpreventable," and he exonerated the company from any blame. The district attorney concurred.
This disaster is a perfect example of the classic Lake Albany clay landslide. The 40,000 tons of rock collapsed into the void left when the 100 feet of thoroughly saturated and unstable clay moved toward the creek, whose banks were undermined by the heavy rains. This initial movement worked in domino fashion to release the surrounding clay. As this slid eastward, it was followed by clay, sand and soil loosened by the slide.
Lake clay is also susceptible to vibration and tremors. The continuous blasting at the nearby quarry contributed to the instability of the clay. The depth of the clay should be of no surprise to those who worked in the clay pit attached to the plant. The now water-filled pit had been dug to a depth of 60 feet.
Gossips has been reproducing the images that appeared with Margaret Schram's articles in The Independent. As a consequence of multiple reproductions, they are not as clear as they might be, so we share these images of the aftermath of the landslide, which provide greater clarity.

Photo: Greenport Historical Society

Photo: Greenport Historical Society


Sunday, January 13, 2019

Meetings of Interest in the Week Ahead

This week's meetings are concentrated in middle of the week--Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday.

  • On Tuesday, January 15, the Finance Committee of the Common Council meets at 5:30 p.m. in City Hall. At the last Common Council meeting, Alderman Rob Bujan (First Ward), who chairs the Finance Committee, announced that the committee will be discussing a strategic plan for municipal finances going forward.
At 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 15, the Common Council holds its regular monthly meeting. It is expected the Council will vote on a revised resolution for the sale of 427 Warren Street.

  • On Wednesday, January 16, the Common Council Public Works and Parks Committee meets at 5:15 p.m. at City Hall. As always, the meeting will feature a report from DPW superintenent Rob Perry.
At 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 16, the Zoning Board of Appeals holds its monthly meeting. No agenda is yet available for the meeting, but the ZBA may once again take up the request for area variances for proposed new construction on Partition Street behind 17-19 Union Street. 
Note that the times of the Public Works and Parks Committee and the ZBA meetings have been corrected since this post has first published. The PW&P Committee meets at 5:15 not 5:30; the ZBA meets at 6:00 not 6:30. For more information, see "Conflict Over the Third Wednesday of the Month."
  • On Thursday, January 17, the Hudson Housing Authority is holding a special meeting at 5:00 p.m. Because of the "robust discussion" at the HHA board's monthly meeting last Wednesday, the board, after going into executive session to discuss the Master Development Agreement (MDA), decided to postpone voting on the resolution to approve the MDA. The vote will take place at this special meeting on Thursday. It will take place in the Community Room at Bliss Towers and is open to the public.
At 6:00 p.m., HHA is expected to present its plans to construct seventy-six units of new Section 8 housing on State Street to the Common Council Economic Development Committee. That meeting takes place at City Hall.

If You Weren't There, or Even If You Were . . .

Randall Martin's video for Invisible CD19NY of Antonio Delgado's swearing in yesterday at Hudson Hall is now available and can be viewed by clicking here.


Escaping the Inventory

In 2013, the Galvan Foundation acquired the Allen Street School, but a few months later, the building made it out of the Galvan inventory. It was sold to its current owners and, in the ensuing years, underwent a textbook restoration. Today, the building, which looked abandoned, bleak, and sad in 2013, looks pretty much as it did in a historic photograph in the collection of Historic Hudson. All that's missing is the ballustrade on the portico.

Allen Street School in 2013

Allen Street School in 1919

Allen Street School, now known as River House, today

Recently, another building made it out of the Galvan inventory. Last year, Gossips reported in February that Galvan had acquired the house at 6 West Court Street and in March that all the foliage around the house had been cut down.

On Friday, the plans for the house's restoration were presented to the Historic Preservation Commission. They were almost textbook except for the intention to replicate the window sash to accommodate insulated glass rather preserving and restoring the original wood sash. The new owner of the house--not the Galvan Foundation--was present at the meeting.

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Sad News That Escaped Gossips' Notice

Because they were scheduled at the same time as meetings of critical interest here in Hudson, Gossips missed the Greenport Planning Board meetings for November and December and consequently missed learning the fate of "The Pines," the Gothic Revival house on the site of what is to become Greenport's newest retail development.

In July, Ed Stiffler, chair of the Greenport Planning Board reported that the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) had determined that the house was eligible for listing in the State and National Registers of Historic Places and was asking that the house be incorporated into the design for the retail development. In October, a representative of Greenport Land Partners (the developer) told the board that, despite SHPO's determination, they still wanted to demolish the house and were trying to learn SHPO's conditions for allowing them to do it. The minutes for the November meeting of the Greenport Planning Board reveal those conditions:
Chairman Stiffler explained that the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has provided a correspondence letter indicating that the structure in question can be taken down but will require three conditions be attached to that approval. Chairman Stiffler identified these conditions. The first condition is the building must be documented. The second condition is that a public exhibit of the building must be located in the new building or on the site that depicts the history of both the building and site. The third condition is that the building elements and materials should be offered to a local non-profit architectural salvage or other capable organization. 
The December minutes of the Greenport Planning Board provide no information about whether or not the developer has agreed to these conditions.

Antonio Delgado in Hudson

Of all the halls, in all the towns, in all the 19th Congressional District, Antonio Delgado chose Hudson Hall as the scene for his official swearing in, which happened today at noon, and Columbia County Democrats gathered in force to celebrate the occasion.

There were lots of TV and video cameras present, so, in the fullness of time, you will probably be able to watch every minute of the proceedings, but in the meantime, Gossips will share only some favorite moments.

Mayor Rick Rector, who was the master of ceremonies for the event, had invited highly decorated World War II veteran Ralph Avery to lead the group in the pledge of allegiance. Avery is the great grandson of Peter Avery, the architect who designed Hudson Hall, which was built in 1855 as the City Hall for Hudson. (This bit of information will be relevant later on.) Curiously, Avery and the audience got a little out of sync during the recitation of the pledge, because Avery left out the phrase "under God," which wasn't added until 1956.

Reverend Ronald Grant of Shiloh Baptist Church delivered the invocation, in which he appealed, "Heal our land. Our land needs healing, our land needs restoration." Before introducing Senator Charles Schumer, who would administer the oath of office to Delgado, Assemblymember Didi Barrett spoke of a paradigm shift in Congress and declared that she now had "a partner in Washington" on such issues as protecting the environment, reproductive rights, and the Hudson River, pursuing social justice and criminal justice reform, and preserving and supporting farms. Introducing Schumer, she called him "the greatest champion for New York State families." 

Schumer, who, when he came onstage with Delgado and his family, greeted the audience with a raised fist, opened his speech by saying he had been asked not to be too political but did want to say one thing: "The symbol of our country should be the Statue of Liberty and not a thirty-foot wall." That statement was greeted with huge applause, accompanied by whooping and foot stomping. When the din subsided, Schumer turned to Avery, the great grandson of the architect of the building, and quipped, "With all that stomping, the building held."

Schumer again got an enthusiastic response from the audience when, in recounting Delgado's life and achievements, he mentioned his time spent "in the music business." Schumer summarized his account of Delgado's career to date by saying, "He got here the old-fashioned way: He earned it."

Schumer's remarks included a little tale about Benjamin Franklin, in which Franklin, enjoying a repast in a coffee house at the end of a session of the Continental Congress, was asked what he and his colleagues had accomplished. Franklin responded, "We have created a republic, if you can keep it." Schumer noted that in Franklin's time "only white, male, Protestant property owners" could vote and then asked the audience how many of them would qualify if the same restrictions applied today. Very few raised their hands. Soon after, Schumer administered the oath of office to Antonio Delgado.

In his remarks after being sworn in, Delgado spoke of the partial government shutdown, calling it a travesty and saying, "It not only takes the focus off priorities, it is hurting people." He went on to say, "We need to move past hate and division to do the work of good government." He confirmed what has already been reported in the news that he is not taking his salary so long as the shutdown continues." He enumerated issues--the environment, rural broadband, the opioid epidemic, affordable, accessible health care--and declared: "I'm ready to work on those things."

In contrast to our previous congressman John Faso, who was known for eschewing face-to-face encounters with the public, Delgado promised, "I'll be seeing each and every one of you at town halls across the district." He then declared, "I can't control everything that goes on in D.C.--shoot, I can't control much--but what I can control is my connection with you. I know that I will do right by you."

He concluded his remarks by quoting someone he identified as "a wise individual" (a Google search revealed it was Reinhold Niebuhr): "Our capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but our inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary."

Delgado answering questions from the press after the swearing in

The Status of the Other Lawsuit

At the beginning of the week, it was reported that the City of Hudson's lawsuit against the Greenport Planning Board had been dismissed. Today on HudsonValley360, Amanda Purcell reports on the status of the other lawsuit--the one A. Colarusso & Sons filed against the City of Hudson Planning Board: "Colarusso countersuit in limbo."