Tomorrow, the mayor is holding a public hearing on Local Law No. 6 and Local Law No. 7, which inspires one to wonder what's happening with the law that came ahead of it in order of introduction: Local Law No. 5, sometimes known as the "Stewart's proposal." The proposed zoning amendment has been on the aldermen's desks since July.
When the law had been placed on the aldermen's desks, it was referred to the Columbia County Planning Board and the Hudson Planning Board for review and comment. Columbia County Planning Board submitted its response to the Council on August 22. Predictably, the CCPB found the proposed action had "no significant county-wide or intercommunity impacts associated with it" and advised, "the City of Hudson Common Council may take final action with a simple majority vote." That said, the CCPB made several comments about the proposed zoning amendment, questioning how a twenty-year period would be determined and documented, how the size of the original structure would be determined, how many times a structure could be enlarged, and raising concerns about the impact of new commercial uses in residential neighborhoods, the effect on the Central Business District, and changes in traffic and circulation.
Comments from the Hudson Planning Board were longer in coming. At its August meeting, having just received a letter from former city attorney Ken Dow critiquing the proposed law, the Planning Board decided it needed more time to understand the proposed law, the thinking behind it, and Dow's comments about it. It was decided they would take another month and invite Alderman John Rosenthal (Fourth Ward), who chairs the Legal Committee where the law originated, to come to the September meeting and talk about the law. That happened on September 13, the day of the New York State primary, so Gossips was not there to witness the meeting. Sometime after the meeting, I spoke with Walter Chatham, chair of the Planning Board, about the board's position on Local Law No. 5 and what the board's recommendation to the Council would be. Chatham told me that the board would support amending the zoning if Stewart's would agree to be a "test animal" and allow the new facility to be "designed under SmartCode precepts."
What a gas station and convenience store "designed under SmartCode precepts" would mean is that Stewart's could not build its basic suburban style facility, where the only design option is flat roof or gable roof. Rather they would have to design a building that followed the physical form and massing of the adjacent buildings, with a similar setback from the street. Chatham also spoke about locating the gas pumps behind the building, where they could not be seen from the street.
At the Common Council Legal Committee meeting last Wednesday, I expected the Planning Board's position on Local Law No. 5 might be discussed, but it wasn't. Instead a related issue was taken up: the Planning Task Force that Council president Tom DePietro announced on August 13 was to be formed. This was, to my knowledge, the first public discussion of the task force since DePietro made the announcement, saying it would "encompass the discussion of Local Law No. 9 of 2017 and Local Law No. 5 of 2018." At the Legal Committee meeting, the topic was introduced by city attorney Andy Howard, who advised Rosenthal that the task force should be considered an ad hoc committee, and its formation could be accomplished by resolution. He went on to explain, "Something that came from that body would come to the Legal Committee and then on to the Council."
When talking about the makeup of the task force, Rosenthal initially suggested that it be seven: the chairs of the Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, Historic Preservation Commission, and Conservation Advisory Council, and three aldermen. Later, it was realized that the code enforcement officer should be on the task force, and, to keep the number of members to seven, the number of aldermen on the task force was reduced to two. Still later, including representatives from HDC (Hudson Development Corporation), HCDPA (Hudson Community Development and Planning Agency), and the Hudson Business Coalition was also mentioned. The discussion concluded with Howard saying he would "start sketching out the resolution."
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAROLE OSTERINK