What wasn't included in the certificate of appropriateness application was replacing the colored glass panes surrounding the display windows with clear glass--something that had already been done without a certificate of appropriateness.
Also done without a certificate of appropriateness was the removal of the signs, believed to be stained glass, that read "Supplies" and "Artist."
Back in 2012, Gossips recounted the story that the panes of colored glass were used to judge the purity of paint colors. Since the colors in the stained glass remained constant, a level of consistency in the colors of hand-mixed and hand-prepared oils could be achieved by comparing them with the colors of the stained glass. Although the likelihood of this being true was questioned in a comment by Sam Pratt, this bit of Hudson lore seems to have persisted.
The new owner of the building claimed some of the stained glass was "broken and crooked" and "hadn't been installed correctly." He said some of it wasn't actually stained glass at all but rather vinyl. He argued, "It is prohibitive for us to do business with a kaleidoscope of color coming in." (The building is to be the new location of the clothing store Loup, now located at 426 Warren Street.) Reacting to the statement, HPC member John Schobel said, "That's not the way that this works."
The applicant argued that the clear glass had been "created and poured in the same way as the original glass was." HPC architect member Chip Bohl asserted, "The history of the storefront needs to be known and evaluated."
It was decided that work could proceed on the stoop, but the HPC would have to have "another conversation" about the windows--those in the storefront and on the upper floors. The HPC is seeking historic photographs of the building to establish the history of the storefront and the configuration of the upper windows. So far, Gossips has been able to find only this one, taken in 1917, when the ground floor of the building was occupied by Miller Brothers Barber Shop.
Sadly, the photo is of little help in confirming the history of the stained glass panes and of no help in understanding the appropriate configuration of the windows on the upper floors.
COPYRIGHT 2021 CAROLE OSTERINK
I can’t believe that someone decided to remove those colored glass panes, what a shame. On the one hand I realize that there are far more important issues in the world right now, and if someone had done that to an old storefront in most other towns no one would complain, but Hudson is such a historic community and things are rightfully different here. For me, I loved to pause every time I walked past those colored panes, I’m not exaggerating. Those windows were the best feature of that building and one of the visual highlights of that block. Sometimes it’s the little things...
ReplyDeletealso the Supplies Artist signs. I loved those
ReplyDeleteIf they didn’t love the building why did they buy it?
ReplyDeleteHow can they be repaired? Surely, the glazier has already disposed of the original glass?? I vote for a hefty fine AND paying for historically accurate replacements. The building owners should have asked...
ReplyDeleteReally? Loup can't do business in a room "with a kaleidoscope of color". How very sad.
ReplyDeleteUnbelievable what people do - just go ahead and ruin and old storefront prior to going tot he Historic Preservation Commission. What do they think it's for?? it's to preserve the history of Hudson and they just stomped all over it. Replace the colored glass and Artist Supplies sign. It was a charming building and they've taken all the character away. Shameful.
ReplyDeleteHow to make charming become boring requires lack of imagination.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhat a shame. This was Henry Ary's studio and art supply store
ReplyDelete