A Bargain at Twice the Price

Richard Moody reports today in the Register-Star that the Columbia County Board of Supervisors has agreed to purchase a tract of land in the Gerald R. Simons Commerce Park for a new training facility for fire fighters. The property is assessed at $438,300; the asking price was $935,000; and, after negotiation, the County is buying it for $840,000. You can read all about it here: "Columbia County to buy Gerald Simons Commerce Park property for fire training facility."
COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Fear of Change

Those of us who own houses in Hudson fear change when it comes to our property assessment. Some of us, who have lived through a few assessors, also fear change when it comes to assessors. But we are going to have to deal with the latter before the former, because Cheryl Kaszluga, our current assessor, has announced her resignation.

In a letter to the Hudson residents, Kaszluga, who was appointed to the position by Mayor William Hallenbeck in November 2013, explains that she has accepted a new full-time position in Dutchess County. The letter continues:

I have put many hours of thought into this decision. I want to thank all the residents of Hudson for their warm welcoming. I really enjoyed working as your assessor, and I have high hopes that you will be treated with respect and fairness in the coming years. Hudson will always have a soft spot in my heart. My mom grew up in Hudson after my grandmother settled here from England. I am excited for my new endeavor and sad to say goodbye.

We wish Kaszluga success in her new undertaking and Mayor Hamilton success in appointing a new assessor for Hudson.
COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Footnotes on a Post from Tuesday

Yesterday, a once regular now only occasional reader of Gossips commented in an email on the post "Houses Back from the Edge." He reminded me that rescuing houses some considered not worth saving started in Hudson back in the 1980s. He cited the notable example of 611 Union Street.

Back in 1984, the Elks wanted to buy this Gothic cottage, built in 1851, and demolish it to expand the parking lot next to their lodge, which was then located in the Richard Upjohn designed Italian villa at 601 Union. Fortunately for us, Cassandra Danz and Walter Brett bought the house instead and restored and preserved it.

From this reader I also learned something I didn't know about one of the houses that was included in my Before and After gallery of rescued houses: 327 State Street.

Sanford Robinson Gifford's sister Mary, who was the artist's constant companion, moved to 327 State Street when Sanford Gifford married in 1877. This is where she was living in 1880, when Sanford Gifford died, and many artists, her brother's friends and colleagues, visited her there. 
COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Meeting Reminder

Tonight at 6 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City Hall, the Common Council Economic Development Committee is holding an information session to hear from Hudson residents about the proposal by Stewart's Shops to expand its gas station and convenience store at the corner of Green Street and Fairview Avenue, a proposal that requires a change in Hudson's zoning and the demolition of two houses.

Photo: StreetView.com

COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Watch It for Yourself

Dan Udell's video of Tuesday night's Common Council meeting is now available on YouTube. Along with the discussion of the resolution authorizing the redemption of 424 Union, you will see, among other things, the Council discussing and then passing a resolution requesting from the mayor a report on the status of the ramp project and Sheena Salvino, executive director of Hudson Development Corporation, explaining how an EPF grant for $250,000 for improvements to the entrance to Promenade Hill would be spent if the application is successful. 

COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

An Update on the Escarpment

On Monday, Gossips reported that the city attorney and the code enforcement officer had determined that there was nothing the City could do to prevent or regulate the removal of foliage from the escarpment below Promenade Hill and Hudson Terrace and the ultimate application of shotcrete to the prehistoric wall of Ordovician shale. That's when Historic Hudson decided to take the concerns about what's happening on our riverfront to another level.

Since it's Amtrak, our national passenger rail service, Historic Hudson contacted our elected officials in Washington: Senator Charles Schumer, who last December interceded for Hudson with CSX; Senator Kirsten Gillibrand; and Congressman John Faso, who sits on the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Historic Hudson also reached out to allies who share a concern for the river and the scenic vistas along the river: the Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter, Scenic Hudson, the SS Columbia Project, and Riverkeeper.

Scenic Hudson’s Director of Land Use Advocacy suggested yesterday that because the escarpment falls within the Front Street-Parade Hill-Lower Warren Street Historic District, a historic district that has been listed in the National Register of Historic Places since 1970, and because New York State's Coastal Management Policy 25 advises against clearing vegetation and modifying natural land forms, the City may want to notify the NYS Department of State and the State Historic Preservation Office. The mayor and the city attorney have been made aware of this suggestion, but Gossips does not know if they have acted on it. Meanwhile, today Congressman Faso's office indicated an interest and concern about the situation.

One sad fact in the current circumstance is that the appearance of our city from the river, including the natural land forms, would be protected if Hudson had an approved LWRP (Local Waterfront Revitalization Program), but regrettably, it does not.

The pictures accompanying this post were taken this morning shortly after 7 a.m. Since then, the clearing has extended farther north and more pink and yellow dots have been painted on the rock face.

COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Foreclosure and Redemption

Last night, Reverend Ed Cross came to the Common Council Finance Committee with several of the members of his Endless Love Temple to ask for help in their predicament: the building where they worship, which they have rented for the past eight years, has been seized by the City for nonpayment of property taxes, and the church is locked out of the building.

Once the foreclosure occurred, the owner of the building had thirty days to pay all the back taxes, penalties, and fees, which in this case amount to around $35,000, and redeem the property. This was not done. Now, it seems, Endless Love Temple is hoping the City will allow them to enter into a payment agreement to pay the taxes and fees and take ownership of the building. Cross made the appeal at the informal Common Council meeting last Monday and was encouraged by Council president Claudia DeStefano to make his case at the Finance Committee, which he did with no different outcome. The window of opportunity for redeeming the property has passed. The church's choices, it seems, are bidding on the property in an auction, where the back taxes due will be the minimum bid, or buying it from the City for fair market value.

A similar but different foreclosure story came before the Council at its regular meeting, when they were asked to vote on a resolution authorizing the redemption of 424 Union Street.   

In this case, the owner had paid the back taxes, penalties, and fees, with a certified check, within the thirty-day period, as prescribed by the law, to redeem the property, but the tenant, Donna Graziano, who has lived in the house for thirty years, was at the Council meeting to tell her story and seek the Council's help. She alleged that the money to redeem the property, although paid to the City by the building owner, had come from Eric Galloway or the Galvan Foundation, and the owner had agreed to sell the house to Galvan once it was redeemed. (Galvan already owns another house farther up the block, 438 Union, acquired in 2012 and vacant.) She told the Council that the owner had rejected an offer on the house made by a neighbor, who would have allowed her to stay on as tenant. She explained to the Council that she was in ill health and other members of her household had serious health problems. She had no car, and she needed to stay in Hudson where she was close to her doctors and the hospital. When the City seized the property, she had received an eviction notice, giving her 30 days to vacate the property. The mayor had extended that time to 90 days. Graziano was appealing to the Council to let her stay in the house, "whoever takes it over." "I paid my rent for thirty years," she told the Council, "but the owner did not pay the taxes."  

Andy Howard, counsel to the Council, reminded the aldermen, who were sympathetic to Graziano's plight, that the owner had the statutory right to redeem the property and "how the owner gets that money is not your role to investigate." He also explained to the Council that "the level at which the City owns [the property] is subject to the right redemption" and advised the aldermen that there would probably be a lawsuit against the City if they did not act on the resolution.

Reluctantly, the aldermen voted. Before voting yes, DeStefano said, "We have no choice." Robert "Doc" Donahue (Fifth Ward) said, "I'm confused; I want to see that lady stay there," but then voted yes. Alexis Keith (Fourth Ward) told the woman, "I hope the City can help you," before voting yes. Rick Rector (First Ward) said, "It may be time to talk to the potential new owner" (although he didn't indicate who he thought should talk to the potential new owner), before voting yes. The resolution authorizing the redemption was approved without the votes of the Third Ward aldermen (the house is located in the Third Ward): John Friedman abstained; Henry Haddad voted no.
COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Houses Back From the Edge

On Thursday, the Common Council Economic Development Committee will hold a public information session about the request from Stewart's Shops for the City of Hudson to amend its zoning on Green Street and Fairview Avenue to permit them to build a larger gas station and convenience store and in the process purchase and demolish two houses: 162 Green Street and 17-19 Fairview Avenue.

Some, in comments on this blog and elsewhere, have expressed the opinion that the houses in question are in such bad shape that they aren't worth saving. The most compelling argument for saving them is that they provide homes for six families. Also compelling is the fact that they, like so many other buildings in Hudson, can be rescued and restored, but once they are gone, they are gone forever, and the neighborhood is forever transformed. 

In support of sparing the houses from demolition, I have assembled a brief gallery of Before and After pictures showing houses that in recent years have gone from "not worth saving" to desirable. The gallery could be larger, but these are enough to make the point.

66 North Third Street

325-327 State Street

545 State Street

61-71 North Fifth Street

102-104 North Fifth Street

There is no reason it couldn't happen eventually for 162 Green Street and 17-19 Fairview Avenue as well.
COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

I Love the Sound of Chainsaws in the Morning

Even before the crew on the escarpment below Promenade Hill got busy denuding the rock wall of all foliage, DPW workers were busy taking their chainsaws to two little ornamental trees at the entrance to the park.

It appears from the state of things when they had cleaned up the site and were ready to go that what they were doing was not tree removal but extreme pruning.

COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

An Anniversary Observed

MICROPOLITAN DIARY
Metropolitan Diary in the New York Times, of which Micropolitan Diary is both homage and shameless imitation, features exclusively entries submitted by readers. Today our imitation is complete. This entry was submitted by a reader.

Dear Diary,

This morning, I noticed a man sitting near his car parked at Rick's Point, with a boom box playing the most beautiful classical music. I didn't realize what it was until I got home and read that today, 7.17.17, is the 300th anniversary of when Handel's Water Music was first played on the Thames River. So wonderful that someone in Hudson was thoughtful enough to honor the anniversary by our river.

Susan Simon

The 300th anniversary of the first performance of Handel's Water Music was the subject of a story on NPR's All Things Considered this afternoon: "300 Years of Handel's 'Water Music,' with a Splash of Politics."
COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

No More Ms. Nice Girl

In a letter to Ed Stiffler, published this afternoon on Imby, Julie Metz takes the Greenport Planning Board to task: "Greenport Shirks Responsibility Under SEQRA, re Colarusso Hail Road." 

Hudson's Face to the River

Last Tuesday, thanks to Richard Wallace, Gossips reported on a project, which had just begun the day before, to clear the entire escarpment below Promenade Hill of all vegetation, soil, and loose rocks.  

Photo: Richard Wallace

According to information received, once the rock face has been completely cleared, it will be covered with shotcrete, a kind of mortar that is applied with pressure hoses to stabilize slopes. The picture below is an industry photo showing shotcrete being applied to a rock face somewhere in the world.

Alarmed by the prospect, after publishing the post, I contacted the mayor, the Conservation Advisory Council, and the chair of the Waterfront Advisory Committee, wanting to know what, if anything, the City could do to prevent this escarpment--the face of Hudson to the river--from being disfigured in this way. To her credit, the mayor immediately passed my concerns along to the city attorney and the code enforcement officer. On Friday, I learned the outcome from the code enforcement officer. 

The railroad right of way extends all the way up to the edge of the cliff--a situation that has probably existed since 1851, when the railroad blasted away the base of the escarpment to make way for the railroad tracks. That being the case, the City of Hudson has no jurisdiction. If, in the zoning that is part of the 2011 Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, this area had been made part of the Core Riverfront District, the Planning Board would presumably have had to approve any work proposed, but, alas, the escarpment is not part of the Core Riverfront District. Below Promenade Hill and Hudson Terrace on either side, from Ferry Street to Dock Street, everything west of the railroad tracks is in the Core Riverfront District, and everything east of the railroad tracks is in the Riverfront Gateway District--ironic name since it is our riverfront gateway that is now being defaced. No one anticipated this.     

The project is expected to take six weeks. They started at the south end and are working their way north. This is what the escarpment looked like this morning, one week after the work began.

COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Vending Machine Update

As I did last Monday morning, I made a trip to the glowing blue vending machine early today to buy a blue bag in which to set out my garbage. I am happy to report that the slot for ATM and credit cards has now been uncovered and appears to be working. I didn't try it, though. Instead I inserted two $1 bills and watched with relief as the blue bag dropped and then heard my change--two quarters--fall. Success! My trash is now at the curb, awaiting the arrival of the garbage truck.
COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Primary Primer

Yesterday, Gossips published the list of candidates that have filed designating petitions to run for local office. It appears from the list that the election could be as good as over after the primary, which takes place on Tuesday, September 12. In most races, Democrats are challenging Democrats--some with cross endorsements from the Republicans or third parties, some without. The Republicans have their own candidate in only two races: Martin Martinez, who is running for alderman in the Second Ward, and Robert "Doc" Donahue, running for reelection as alderman in the Fifth Ward. 

Donahue, a longtime Democrat, switched his registration to Republican in 2015. He has held the position of Fifth Ward alderman continuously since 1994. This year, the ward he seeks to represent is considerably smaller--both in geographic area and population--than it has been in the past. The maps below show the ward divisions as they had been since 1886, when the Fifth Ward was first created, and the new ward divisions created by last year's successful Fair & Equal referendum.

The new ward boundaries have the greatest impact on one candidate for alderman: Henry Haddad. Haddad is currently in his second term as Third Ward alderman, but in 2017 he is running in the First Ward, where there are three other candidates vying for the two seats. To achieve equal population in all five wards, a great deal of what had been the Third Ward is now part of the First Ward.

It is important to stress that the new boundaries create wards that are equal in total population not an number of registered voters. Notwithstanding a letter to the editor in the Register-Star claiming that Fair & Equal has not been achieved because the First Ward now has more voters than any of the other wards, that is not what is required by law. In a series of cases in the 1960s, the Supreme Court ruled that legislative districts must be of equal population. The Public Mapping Project explains it this way: 

The court held that the 14th Amendment requires "one person, one unit of representation." That is to say that every person--irregardless if they are unable to vote due to their citizenship status or voting age--is afforded equal representation. Districts are therefore drawn on equal population, not on equal votes.

In a city that has just declared itself to be "welcoming and inclusive," that distinction seems particularly significant.
 


Here's more information relevant to the primary on September 12. In two races, Common Council president and Fourth Ward supervisor, the Independence Party filed an OTB (Opportunity to Ballot) petition. This means, as I understand it, that members of the Independence Party can go to the polls on September 12 and write in the name of a candidate--any candidate--they want to represent their party for that office in the November election. The person receiving the most votes gets the Independence Party line on the November ballot.
COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Eyesore or Memories Gone

It has been more than six years since Jeremiah Rusconi presented to the Historic Preservation Commission, in April 2011, his proposal to demolish the abandoned buildings he owned at the corner of Front and Cross streets.

He told that HPC that the buildings had been constructed in the 1920s, after this amazing Stick Style house, which stood near the end of Cross Street, had been destroyed by fire.

He explained that prior to the 1920s the site had been an open space--lawn and garden extending down from 52 South Front Street--and he intended to return the site to what it had been. 

The HPC granted a certificate of appropriateness for the demolition, but years passed, and nothing happened. Last week, however, a temporary fence went up around the buildings, and the demolition began.

Photo: Peter Jung

This morning, nothing remains of the buildings but a pile of rubble.

COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Who Wants to Run

Thursday was the deadline for filing petitions to run for public office, and today Gossips learned what petitions have been filed.

Mayor

• Democrat: Earl Swanigan
• Democrat: Rick Rector
• Conservative: Rick Rector
• Republican: Rick Rector

Treasurer

• Democrat: Heather Campbell

Common Council President

• Democrat: Steve Dunn
• Democrat: Tom DePietro
• Republican: Tom DePietro
• Working Families: Tom DePietro
• Conservative: Tom DePietro
• Independence: OTB (Opportunity to Ballot)

FIRST WARD

Supervisor

• Democrat: Sarah Sterling

Alderman

• Democrat: Rob Bujan
• Democrat: Michael O'Hara
• Democrat: Kamal Johnson
• Democrat: Henry Haddad
• Republican: Rob Bujan
• Republican: Kamal Johnson
• Conservative: Rob Bujan
• Conservative: Kamal Johnson
• Working Families: Kamal Johnson
• Independence: Rob Bujan

SECOND WARD

Supervisor

• Democrat: Abdus Miah
• Democrat: Willette Jones
• Republican: Abdus Miah
• Conservative: Abdus Miah
• Working Families: Willette Jones
• Independence: Abdus Miah

Alderman

• Democrat: Dewan Sarowar
• Democrat: Tiffany Garriga
• Democrat: Victor Mendolia
• Republican: Martin Martinez
• Conservative: Martin Martinez
• Working Families: Tiffany Garriga
• Working Families: Victor Mendolia
• Independence: Dewan Sarowar

THIRD WARD

Supervisor

• Democrat: John Friedman
• Democrat: Michael Chameides
• Working Families: Michael Chameides

Alderman

• Democrat: Calvin Lewis
• Democrat: Shershah Mizan
• Republican: Calvin Lewis
• Republican: Shershah Mizan
• Working Families: Calvin Lewis
• Working Families: Shershah Mizan

FOURTH WARD

Supervisor

• Democrat: Bill Hughes
• Democrat: Linda Mussmann
• Republican: Bill Hughes
• Conservative: Bill Hughes
• Working Families: Linda Mussman
• Independence: OTB (Opportunity to Ballot)

Alderman

• Democrat: John Rosenthal
• Democrat: Lauren Scalera
• Democrat: Rich Volo
• Republican: Lauren Scalera
• Conservative: Lauren Scalera

FIFTH WARD

Supervisor

• Democrat: Rick Scalera
• Republican: Rick Scalera
• Conservative: Rick Scalera

Alderman

• Democrat: Dominic Merante
• Democrat: Eileen Halloran
• Republican: Dominic Merante
• Republican: Bob Donahue
• Conservative: Dominic Merante
• Conservative: Bob Donahue
• Working Families: Dominc Merante

The petitions, though submitted, must undergo prima facie review by the election commissioners and are subject to objections before candidates are officially on the ballot for the primary. The schedule of the petition process can be viewed here.
COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Colarusso and the Hudson Planning Board

On Thursday night, the Hudson Planning Board held a public hearing on the repairs made to the dock last year by A. Colarusso & Son without seeking the required permits from the City of Hudson. It will be recalled that, in January, code enforcement officer Craig Haigh issued an Order to Remedy for the unauthorized work; in February, Colarusso appealed the OTR to the Zoning Board of Appeals; and in May, the ZBA denied Colarusso's appeal and upheld the OTR. Now the already completed project is before the Planning Board. The public hearing on Thursday was part of the Planning Board's review.

During the public hearing, comments were made by Julie Metz, Timothy O'Connor, John Rosenthal, Peter Jung, Ted Gramkow, Melissa Auf der Maur, and Tony Stone. Common themes in their comments were the need to take a holistic approach to the dock and the haul road, evidence and suspicion about intensification of industrial activity, questions about Colarusso's ultimate plans, and concerns that the safeguards against industrial expansion, which were written into the City's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program zoning, be enforced. When Danette Koke launched into a statement about the aesthetic impact of industrial activity at the dock, Planning Board chair Tom DePietro stopped her, saying that the public hearing was for gathering information, and her statement was inappropriate because it was emotional. If you are curious to know exactly what was said, Jess Puglisi recorded the entire meeting for WGXC. That recording can be heard here. 

After the public comments had been heard, the Planning Board moved on to its regular meeting, but they did not close the public hearing. DePietro indicated that the board will continue to accept information pertinent to the dock project until their regular meeting in August. 

The board then heard the amendment proposed for parking at Galvan Armory to create the spaces required if COARC Starting Place is to move into the basement of the building. (More on that later.) That done, the conversation returned to the dock, when Colarusso engineer P. J. Prendergast asked if the board needed more information from him. There was an exchange between Mitch Khosrova, counsel to the Planning Board, and Prendergast and the lawyer standing in for John Privitera about the relevance of information sought by the board. Prendergast asserted that the volume of mining undertaken was irrelevant, because mining activity was overseen by other regulatory agencies. DePietro objected, telling Prendergast that "the volume speaks to things that are under our purview." Prendergast denied that the dock repair had anything to do with the intensification of industrial activity. 

On the topic of truck traffic to the dock, Khosrova told Prendergast, "The board needs to know that it is within the threshold of safety. Colarusso certainly has the numbers for how many trucks go to the dock." He later pointed out that the only information provided so far was that the peak number was 142 round trips a day. To objections from the Colarusso lawyer that this information was not relevant to the dock repair, which he stressed was done for public safety, Khosrova insisted that the dock and the haul road were integrally related: "If you didn't have the dock, you wouldn't need the haul road; if you didn't have the haul road, you wouldn't need the dock."

When Khosrova asked about mitigation for noise and dust at the dock, Prendergast claimed, as he has before, that the source of dust problem was Rick's Point, which he called "the parking lot for the city park," where, he complained, there was "not any improvement at all." The following video, provided to Gossips by a reader, effectively puts the lie to Prendergast's claim that dust does not emanate from the Colarusso dock.

 COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

This Week in Hudson Politics

Bill Williams at 98.5 The Cat reports that on Thursday Earl Swanigan pleaded guilty in Hudson City Court to charges of forcible touching and criminal trespass stemming from an incident that occurred when Swanigan was gathering petition signatures: "Hudson mayoral candidate pleads guilty." 
Sometime on Thursday or before, Thursday being the deadline for filing, Swanigan's designating petitions to run for mayor were submitted to the Board of Elections.
COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

Of Interest

Contemplating the implications for Greenport of the giant Amedore development being proposed for Route 9H in Claverack, not far from the border with Greenport, Greenportian Carol Peckham, on her blog Thoughts on Greenport: Hanging Around Hudson, asks the question: "Will Greenport Become the Outhouse for Columbia County?"

COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK

The Great War: July 9, 1917

Donald Trump arrived in Paris this morning. He was invited by French president Emmanuel Macron to attend the celebration of Bastille Day tomorrow, July 14, but news coverage of the visit also notes that it is the 100th anniversary of the arrival of the first U.S. soldiers in France to fight alongside French and British troops in the Great War. The latter fact is the inspiration for sharing today the order to the troops issued by Major General John J. Pershing, the commander of the American Expeditionary Forces in World War I. The order was quoted on the front page of the Hudson Evening Register for July 9. 1917.

For the first time in history an American army finds itself in European territory. The good name of the United States of America and the maintenance of cordial relations require the perfect deportment of each member of this command.

It is of the gravest importance that the soldiers of the American army shall at all times treat the French people, and especially the women, with the greatest courtesy and consideration. The valiant deeds of the French armies and the allies, by which they together have successfully maintained the common cause for three years, and the sacrifices of the civil population of France in support of their armies, command our profound respect. This can best be expressed on the part of our forces by uniform courtesies to all the French people and by the faithful observance of their laws and customs.

The intense cultivation of the soil in France under conditions caused by the war makes it necessary that extreme care be taken to do no damage to private property. The entire French manhood capable of bearing arms is in the field fighting the enemy, and it should, therefore, be a point of honor to each member of the American army to avoid doing the least damage to any property in France. Such conduct is much more reprehensible here. Honor them as those of our own country.

General John J. "Black Jack" Pershing

COPYRIGHT 2017 CAROLE OSTERINK