Monday, March 22, 2021

COVID-19 Update

The Columbia County Department of Health has released its numbers for today. Since Saturday, there have been 31 new cases of COVID-19. The number of active cases being reported today is six fewer than Saturday. If the number of active cases is accurate, it can be deduced that 37 more people are now considered to be recovering from the virus. The number of county residents now in mandatory quarantine is 24 fewer than Saturday, but the number hospitalized with the virus and in the ICU remains the same. There has not been a death from COVID-19 for a week now, since Monday, March 15.

The New York Forward dashboard is reporting a positivity rate for Columbia County on Saturday of 1.9 percent and a seven-day average of 2.1 percent. By comparison, the daily positivity rate for the Capital Region is 1.6 percent and the seven-day average is 2.0 percent.

Meetings of Interest in the Week Ahead

Here we are, in the first week of spring, and there are a three special meetings, along with some regular meetings and special event, in the offing.
  • Tonight, Monday, March 22, the Common Council holds a special meeting at 6:00 p.m. to consider a resolution authorizing the Tourism Board to hire a project manager for Shared Streets 2021. The job description for the project manager, who will report directly to the mayor, has been posted on the City of Hudson website, as has a letter of support for hiring a project manager from the Hudson Business Coalition. Click here to join the Zoom meeting.
Photo: JD Urban|Hudson Hall
  • On Tuesday, March 23, the board of Hudson Development Corporation meets at noon. In addition to the regular monthly meeting, it will also be the board's annual meeting. An update and discussion of the disposition of the Kaz site, a.k.a. the Montgomery Street property, is one of the items on the agenda. Click here to join the Zoom meeting. 
  • Also on Tuesday, March 23, the Hudson City School District Board of Education holds a special meeting at 5:00 p.m. to accept a purchase offer for the former John L. Edwards School. Council president Tom DePietro has indicated that the purchaser of the building is a developer who wants to convert the school into affordable housing, but the identity of the developer has not been revealed. The school board meeting, an in-person meeting, will take place in Room 22-C at Hudson Senior High School. The announcement of this meeting provided the following directives: "Attendees should park in the north parking lot (by the electronic sign) and use the entrance in that lot (a sign will be posted). Masks/face coverings and health screening required." It is not entirely clear what "health screening" involves.  
Photo: Jonathan Simons
  • At 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 23, the Planning Board holds a special meeting. This meeting is to be entirely devoted to the continuation of the board's review of Colarusso's conditional use permit applications. Click here to join the Zoom meeting. No public comment will be taken at the meeting.
  • On Wednesday, March 24, the Common Council ad hoc committee committed to selling City-owned property to rebuild the fund balance meets at 5:00 p.m. When the committee met last month, Council president Tom DePietro, who seems to chair all the ad hoc committee meetings, had three properties in mind for selling: 1 North Front Street, the current location of the Chamber of Commerce; 10-12 Warren Street, where the Hudson Daycare Center is located; and 429 Warren Street, where the Code Enforcement Office is. It will be interesting to see what progress has been made since then. The link to join the Zoom meeting should be published on the City of Hudson website prior to the meeting.
  • At 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 24, there is a meeting of the Hudson Housing Authority Board of Commissioners. The City website indicates this is a meeting of the Tenant Relations Subcommittee. Gossips' notes from last week's HHA meeting indicate that this week's meeting is to be a policy meeting. Click here to join the meeting and find out which it is.
  • At 6:15 p.m. on Wednesday, March 24, there is a meeting of the Common Council ad hoc committee pursuing the development of the solar farm on land owned by the City just north of Charles Williams Park. At the March meeting of the Conservation Advisory Council, CAC member David Konigsberg brought up the proposed solar project and spoke of "understanding the ecological value of the property." He spoke of the need to install solar "in a way that does not disturb the environment," mentioning in particular pollinator habitat. CAC member Michael O'Hara said there was a mapping tool developed by Scenic Hudson, which was "just the thing for evaluating the parcel," pointed out the parcel was a clay bank, and expressed concern about disturbing the clay. O'Hara suggested it was "an appropriate role for [the CAC] to play to advise the City if the plan makes sense." Perhaps on Wednesday it will be revealed if the CAC has stepped in to advise on this proposal. The link to join the Zoom meeting should be published on the City of Hudson website prior to the meeting.   
  • On Thursday, March 25, at 6:00 p.m., the Hudson Area Library History Room on Zoom series presents a virtual talk on the history of Shantytown, a.k.a. the Shacks, the Furgary Boat Club. Gary Sheffer, who chairs the History Room Committee, will talk with Leo Bower, a resident historian with particular expertise in the Shacks. Visit hudsonarealibrary.org to register for the Zoom event or contact Brenda Shufelt at (518) 828-1792, ext. 106 or brenda.shufelt@hudsonarealibrary.org.
The Shacks after a flood in 1948
  • On Friday, March 26, the Historic Preservation Commission holds its second meeting of the month at 10:00 a.m. It is expected that, among other things, the review of the proposed restoration of 59 Allen Street, the Charles Alger house, will continue.  Click here to join the Zoom meeting.
Photo: Matt McGhee
COPYRIGHT 2021 CAROLE OSTERINK

Sunday, March 21, 2021

The CAC Weighs In

The City of Hudson has had a Conservation Advisory Council since 2015. In the first years of its existence, the attention of the CAC was totally taken up with preparing the City's Natural Resource and Open Space Inventory, a document that was completed in the spring of 2019. Since then, the CAC has been engaged in such things as securing a grant to fund a professional street tree inventory and a tree management plan, advocating for the adoption of a tree ordinance, and now weighing in on the parking lot on Prospect Avenue being proposed by Columbia Memorial Health.

In a letter sent to the Planning Board last week, the members of the CAC recommend including bioswales to mitigate storm water runoff, planting native species trees to keep the parking lot from becoming a "heat island," using an alternative surface to asphalt (they suggest structural soil or porous pavers), and including electric car charging stations. 

The letter concludes:
We ask that CMH please keep in mind the nature of our shared “neighborhood” with appropriate sidewalks, street crossings, landscaping and lighting to retain the sensibility of this is a neighborhood, “people live here,” as opposed to “cars park here.”
The building on the site is not a special example of mid-century architecture, it is one of a million, not one in a million. The edifice was a cookie-cutter, cost-effective solution to a need that happened to be built in the mid-century. We assume that the structure drains money from CMH operating costs at a good clip. Surely, it cannot be properly and cost-effectively brought up to current code to meet energy efficiency and health standards of 2021. Well designed parking could be the best use of the land. It is allowed, CMH deems it is necessary, many residents would deem a CMH parking lot necessary, but let’s get it right, let’s encourage building with the grandchildren of our grandchildren in mind.
The demolition will be expensive, building a state-of-the-art parking lot will be expensive. There is savings in not having the old building to maintain and we are urging that Columbia Memorial consider a better, future oriented, environmentally friendly solution to the parking need. . . .
As we build out, renew or repurpose properties we must set aside short-term savings and think of long-term investment in our community, we must think about the health of the planet and the health of our citizens.

The entire letter can be found here.

An Idea Whose Time Has Come . . . Again

Over the years, Gossips has told the history of the Public Square, now commonly known as Seventh Street Park, in parts, as information was discovered. Now, given the new initiative to make improvements to the park being spearheaded by Dorothy Heyl, Walter Chatham, and Dale Schafer, it makes sense to put it together in one post. 

Anna Bradbury recounts the story of the park's beginnings in her 1908 book History of the City of Hudson, New York, quoting from the minutes of the Common Council. It should be noted that the City of Hudson was incorporated on April 22, 1785.  
1785, July 25th. It was voted "that one house lot on Main street should be given to Ezekiel Gilbert, as a free donation, for his essential services done the proprietors, in bringing about the incorporation of the city."
Whether Mr. Gilbert built on this lot is uncertain, but in the year 1800, he occupied a pleasant country residence standing on or near the site of the St. Charles Hotel, and gave to the city a portion of the ground for the upper Public Square, with the intention of having it laid out as a park.
Bradbury tells us that, despite Gilbert's intention, "for some inscrutable reason it was denuded of its fine old forest trees, and paved with cobblestones." This picture gives an idea of what the area looked like in the first half of the 19th century.

Bradbury is also the source for understanding how, seventy-eight years after Gilbert gave the parcel to the City, the square wae transformed into a park.
[The Public Square] as we have seen was intended for a public park by the donor, but for some inscrutable reason it was denuded of its fine old forest trees, and paved with cobblestones. To complete the devastation, the Hudson and Berkshire Railroad was allowed to cross it, and thus it remained until 1878, when the matter was taken up by a resident on the upper side of the Square. Subscriptions were solicited and a sufficient sum was raised, together with the gift of the coping and trees from individuals, to transform the treeless desert into a refreshing little oasis. The Boston and Albany Railroad Company atoned in a measure for its presence, by generously furnishing sufficient gravel to fill in the whole surface of the Park.
Five years later, in 1883, the park got an important enhancement: a glorious fountain at its center. 

An article that appeared in the Hudson Evening Register on September 11, 1883, describes the fountain in detail.

HUDSON PUBLIC FOUNTAIN
An ornament to the City and a monument to 
Public Spirited Citizens. A Description of the Work of Art, 
and who were Instrumental in Preparing it. 
Now that the beautiful fountain in Public Park is nearly completed and our citizens have enjoyed the sight of "Venus Rising from the Sea," exhibiting in the most effective manner the power of our water supply, and proving that it can be put to ornamental as well as useful purposes, it is proper to speak in detail of this work of art, and award credit to those who were chiefly instrumental in procuring it.
The total height of the fountain, including the foundation, is eighteen feet. The pan is a gurgoyle octagon, eight feet five inches above the base: diameter of pan, eight feet, eleven inches. The ground basin is twenty five feet in diameter. The foundation is of Coral Marble, handsomely cut, from the quarries of Supervisor Fred. W. Jones, and was donated by the energetic and public spirited gentleman.
The foundation is capped by a fine slab of Vermont marble, which was generously donated by Patrick Hoctor, of the Hudson Granite and Marble Works. From this rises the base surrounded by the figures, all in graceful proportion and artistic design. But to be fully appreciated, it must be seen when the water in full force is playing through its numerous jets and rising and falling in fantastic forms.
Mr. D. Martin Haviland is entitled to much credit for his persevering efforts in securing to the city not only this beautiful fountain, but the handsome park in which it is located. One of the most unsightly spots in the city has within a few years been converted into one of the most attractive. In this enterprise Mr. Haviland's efforts have been generously seconded by the Boston & Albany Railroad Company, and the action of our Common Council, by the contributions of citizens, and by the local press.
At the outset we said the fountain was nearly completed. It only lacks the finishing touches of the artist's brush. This, we understand, Mr. Silas W. Tobey, the veteran artist, has volunteered to do, and this assurance is sufficient guarantee that the work will be well done and in keeping with the fountain and its surroundings.
In 1883, with the fountain in place, the park was complete. All that was needed was for the trees to grow a bit to produce some shade.

A century later, however, in the heyday of urban renewal, it was determined that the park needed some updating, and the focus of those efforts was the fountain. Instead of a fountain surmounted by a statue of Venus Rising from the Sea, there was to be "Inspiration Fountain"--jets of water illumined by colored lights. In 1975, the old fountain was dug up. Its coral marble and the Vermont marble base was carted off to a junk yard on Columbia Street, where, according to local legend, it was smashed to smithereens. 

Venus, as a freestanding statue, was relegated to the northwest corner of the park, where in July 1978 she was bashed to pieces by vandals. (The statue is made of zinc.)

The statue was repaired and returned to her spot at the corner of Seventh and Columbia in November 1978.


Eleven months later, the statue was struck by a car driven by an intoxicated man and broken again.


Again it was repaired, but the repairs involved "filling all internal cavities with cement, plaster and epoxy and welding in heavy reinforcing." The statue was returned to the park and remained there until 1998. It now resides in a back corner of a DPW garage on North Second Street.


Improving Seventh Street Park has been the subject of discussion for quite a while now. In February 2012, a group met in the back room of Wunderbar to talk about improvements to area of Hudson above Sixth Street, which people were then beginning to call "Hudson's East End." The focus of the conversation was Seventh Street Park. Two years later, on a Friday night in June, many of the same folks gathered in the conference room at 1 North Front Street to hear Cathryn Dwyre present her concept for a reimagined public square

Dwyre began by dismissing the 1878 design of the park as a "Roman concept," already out of fashion when it was inappropriately imposed on the square--inappropriately because it pretended that the railroad tracks did not slice through the space. Dwyre's inspiration for what she was proposing came from Teardrop Park in lower Manhattan, Sou Fujimoto's Serpentine Pavilion in London, the Overhoff-Halprin fountain in Seattle, and the High Line, which she mentioned often in her presentation.  

Dwyre had created her design pro bono at the invitation of Sheena Salvino, then executive director of HDC and HCDPA. The design was created to accompany a grant application for park improvements. The City didn't get the grant, and the plan for reimagining the park, which was not particularly well received, was never pursued.

Now, in 2021, Heyl, Chatham, and Schafer are seeking a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the City to make improvements that would be financed by grants and private fundraising efforts. Last Tuesday, in a presentation to the Common Council, they outlined things that could be done to improve the park in the short term and in the long term.
Possible Short-Term Steps

  • Removal of the fences from around the fountain.
  • Removal of extraneous elements--the kiosk, the bollards.
  • Appropriate pruning of trees and bushes.
  • Consideration of attractive and inviting seating.

Possible Long-Term Steps

  • Consideration of the fountain.
  • Replacement of paving.
  • Landscaping, including trees and brushes.
  • Attractive lighting. 

They made the case for restoring the park, but for Hudsonians who have been talking about this for years, the issue is a no-brainer.

Let's hope that public spirited citizens in the 21st century can bring about the restoration of this important public space just as public spirited citizens in the 19th century succeeded in creating it. 
COPYRIGHT 2021 CAROLE OSTERINK

On the Political Scene

The Hudson City Democratic Committee, which saw a wave of resignations at the beginning of the year, has rebuilt itself. The HCDC announced its new appointments yesterday in the following press release.
The Hudson City Democratic Committee is pleased to announce that it has made several new appointments. “We are now ready to do the work that needs to be done,“ said HCDC Chair Kate Treacy.
The four new appointees include two returning members, Dorothy Heyl and Randall Martin, who have previously served as Treasurer and Chair of the HCDC. Martin will represent the Fifth Ward and Heyl will represent the Third Ward. Appointed to fill the two First Ward vacancies are Nick Zachos and Sergio Guadarrama. Zachos is familiar to Hudsonites as the director of the Hudson Youth Department. Guadarrama has a business designing sustainable clothing with a purpose.
The four appointments are for the remainder of the two-year terms recently vacated by other members. To remain on the committee beyond October, the new members will need to submit petitions in this Primary election cycle. The deadline for submitting petitions is March 25. 
The HCDC has also appointed new officers to its Executive Committee. Heyl will resume the position of Treasurer and will also serve as Acting Secretary until a longerterm Secretary is found. Revonda Smith and Kirby Crone will serve as Vice Chair and Second Vice Chair. Smith is a life-long resident of Hudson and is the current Chair of the Hudson Housing Authority. Crone is an artist who has lived in Hudson for five years and is excited to help the Committee thrive through deeper community involvement.
Dewan Sarowar (2nd Ward), Abdus Miah (2nd Ward), Shershah Mizan (3rd Ward), William Hughes (4th Ward), Kate Treacy (4th Ward and Chair), and Verity Smith (5th Ward) continue in their roles on the Committee.
Please contact the HCDC at info@hudsoncitydemocrats.org with questions or interest in involvement with the Committee.

Saturday, March 20, 2021

COVID-19 Update

The Columbia County Department of Health has released its numbers for today. On the one-year anniversary of the first case of COVID-19 to be reported in the county, there has been just one new case of COVID-19 since yesterday. Strangely, although there is only one new case being reported, the number of active cases reported today is eight more than yesterday, so there's an error somewhere. There are 32 fewer county residents in mandatory quarantine today than yesterday, but the number hospitalized with the virus remains the same, with one fewer in the ICU today than yesterday. There has not been a death from COVID-19 in Columbia County since Monday, March 15. 

The New York Forward dashboard is reporting a positivity rate for Columbia County yesterday of 1.4 percent and a seven-day average of 2.1 percent. By comparison, the daily positivity rate for the Capital Region is 1.6 percent and the seven-day average is 1.9 percent. 

An Unhappy Anniversary

One year ago today, the first case of COVID-19 was reported in Columbia County. The news of the first case came at about 11:00 a.m. By late afternoon that day, there were three cases. Since then, as of yesterday, there have been 3,725 cases of COVID-19 in Columbia County, and 89 deaths have been attributed to it.

Photo: The Farmer's Almanac
On a more hopeful note, the vernal equinox occurred this morning at 5:37 a.m. Today is the first day of spring!
COPYRIGHT 2021 CAROLE OSTERINK

A Warning to Heed

A press release yesterday from Matt Murell, chair of the Columbia County Board of Supervisors, contained this warning:

DON’T DISPLAY VACCINATION CARD 
County officials said Friday that those inclined to sharing proof of their vaccination on social media are advised to refrain from doing so. Cases of stolen identity have been reported among those who have displayed their vaccination card online. 

Friday, March 19, 2021

The Future for Promenade Hill

There's an article in the Register-Star today about the situation at Promenade Hill: "High bid pauses Promenade Hill construction." The article confirms a couple of things Gossips suspected. The lowest of the three bids, which was still $500,000 over budget, came from A. Colarusso & Son. Cutting a half million out of the budget will be done by using cheaper materials. The article quotes Mayor Kamal Johnson as saying, "We're in talks of that now, so it's not definitive yet, but basically it's going to end up being some materials. Instead of using a certain stone we'll use a different version to scale some stuff down, but it's not really a big deal. These things kind of happen. It's just a small setback."


That's good to know.

COVID-19 Update

The Columbia County Department of Health has released its numbers for today. Since yesterday, there have been thirteen new cases of COVID-19. The number of active cases being reported today is two fewer than yesterday, from which it can be inferred that fifteen more county residents are now considered to be recovering from the virus. There are 42 more county residents in mandatory quarantine today than yesterday, but the number hospitalized remains the same, with one fewer of those hospitalized in the ICU. There has not been a death from COVID-19 in Columbia County since Monday, March 15.

The New York Forward dashboard is reporting a positivity rate for Columbia County yesterday of 2.8 percent and a seven-day average of 2.1 percent. By comparison, the daily positivity rate for the Capital Region is 1.9 percent and the seven-day average is 1.9 percent.

Who Will Represent Us?

Fourteen months into a two-year term, our elected officials are required to commit to running for reelection. Some are doing so; some are not. With only five days left before designating petitions must be filed with the Board of Elections, here's how the field looks:
Mayor  It is assumed that Kamal Johnson will be running for a second term. So far, no one has emerged to challenge him. 

Common Council President  It is assumed that Tom DePietro will be running for a third term. So far, no one has emerged to challenge him.

City Treasurer  Heather Campbell, who has ably served the City as treasurer since 2014, is being challenged by Michael Hofmann, who has been endorsed by the Working Families Party.
FIRST WARD
Supervisor Sarah Sterling, who has served as First Ward supervisor since 2012, announced last month she would not be seeking reelection. Claire Cousin, who has been endorsed by the Working Families Party, appears to be the only candidate running for this office.

Aldermen Rebecca Wolff, who is serving her first term as alderman, has made it known she does not intend to seek reelection. Art Frick, a newcomer to Hudson politics, has announced his intention to run for First Ward alderman. He may be the only candidate, since Jane Trombley, who like Wolff is serving her first term in office, has not yet committed to seeking reelection.
SECOND WARD
Supervisor Tiffany Garriga, who has been an alderman in the Second Ward since 2014, is now challenging Abdus Miah, who is seeking his third term as Second Ward supervisor. Garriga has been endorsed by the Working Families Party. 
Aldermen It is assumed that Dewan Sarowar will be seeking a third term as Second Ward alderman. There has been no confirmation that anyone else intends to run for alderman in the Second Ward.
THIRD WARD
Supervisor It is assumed that Michael Chameides, who has been Third Ward supervisor since 2018 and currently also serves as mayor's aide, will be seeking a third term as supervisor.
Aldermen Both Third Ward aldermen--Calvin Lewis and Shershah Mizan--were first elected in 2017. It is assumed that Lewis will be seeking a third term. It is not clear. at this point, if Mizan will be.
FOURTH WARD
Supervisor Linda Mussmann, who has served as Fourth Ward supervisor since 2018, will be seeking a third term.
Aldermen It appears that John Rosenthal, who has served as Fourth Ward alderman since 2018, will not be seeking a third term. Malachi Walker, who is serving this first term, is seeking reelection. Theo Anthony, who now serves on the Police Advisory and Reconciliation Committee, has confirmed his intention to run.
FIFTH WARD
Supervisor Rick Scalera, who has held the position since 2012, is assumed to be running for reelection.
Aldermen Eileen Halloran, who was first elected in 2017, has made it known that she will not be seeking a third term. Dominic Merante, who also was elected in 2017, does intent to run again. Also running for alderman in the Fifth Ward is Rebecca Borrer.  

In 2019, we nearly found out what happens if there are not enough candidates running to fill all the positions--never mind choice. This year, we may actually find out. But there is still time for people interested in serving their community to get on the ballot. 

Designating petitions are due next week. Petitions must be submitted to the Board of Elections between Monday, March 22, and Thursday, March 25. Granted that doesn't leave much time, but the bar for signatures on those petitions is very low. For those considering a run for supervisor or alderman, here are the number of signatures, by ward, you will need:

First Ward  11
Second Ward  8
Third Ward  9
Fourth Ward  9
Fifth Ward  7

Here's the ward map, in case you don't know which ward you live in.


If you are thinking of running for a citywide office--mayor, Council president, treasurer--you will need 42 signatures. Best practice is to get at least twice as many signatures as you need, in case some of your signers are disqualified. 

You can call the Board of Elections bright and early on Monday morning for guidance and help. The office opens at 8:00 a.m. The number is 518 828-3115.
COPYRIGHT 2021 CAROLE OSTERINK

Thursday, March 18, 2021

The Historic Fishing Village: Why Does It Matter?

This morning's post about Promenade Hill and the construction bids that came in way over budget unexpectedly inspired a contentious debate in the comments about another DRI project: the historic fishing village, a.k.a. the Furgary Boat Club. For those who don't see the value in the site, this event, happening next Thursday, may be of interest.

 Virtual Talk on the History of Shantytown

The Hudson Area Library History Room on Zoom presents "The History of Shantytown (a.k.a. The Furgary) in Hudson," Thursday, March 25, 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. Gary Sheffer, member of the library Board of Trustees and chair of the History Room Committee, interviews Leo Bower, lifelong local and a resident historian with a special expertise in Hudson's Shantytown. A question-and-answer period follows the program, which is our first live History Room on Zoom. Visit hudsonarealibrary.org for Zoom registration link or contact Brenda Shufelt at (518) 828-1792, ext. 106 or brenda.shufelt@hudsonarealibrary.org.
Most locals are familiar with the fishing shacks at the end of Dock Street in the North Bay area of Hudson just past the Kite's Nest River City Garden but many do not know the history of these shacks and how far back they go. They are part of a 14.4 acre parcel that was purchased originally in the 1600s by a German immigrant from Indigenous people. There have been businesses on the land including gristmills, slaughterhouses and tanneries. The first Shantytown shacks were constructed in the 1880s and through the middle of the next century they functioned as sites for shad, sturgeon, and herring fishing. Active use of Shantytown continued into the 21st century until the city decreed that the shacks could no longer be used. A project to demolish most of the shacks and restore a few is part of the city's 2017 NYS Downtown Revitalization Initiative grant.
Shantytown was known specifically for shad fishing enterprises, which were important in sustaining local families through the Great Depression and World War II. Furthermore, Shantytown now represents one of the few shad fishing sites, an important cultural and economic phenomenon along the Hudson River, still existing. Consequently, Shantytown has been deemed a site eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Daria Merwin, co-director of the Cultural Resource Survey Program at the New York State Museum in Albany, and Linda Mackey, a historic preservation specialist, have written that Shantytown has "the tangible remains of a traditional way of life that is rapidly disappearing," which "represent[s] a time when sturgeon and shad were abundant in the Hudson River and people made their livelihoods fishing the river and selling their catch on the shore."
This library's program will concentrate on the height of the Shantytown's shad fishing culture in the mid-20th century and the families and lifestyle during this time. Progress and obstacles to the preservation of Shantytown will also be discussed.
The preceding was quoted from the press release about the event distributed by the Hudson Area Library. 

Gossips Disclosure: My first visit to the shacks was in 1995, on a walking tour of the waterfront led by John Cody, who then chaired the Waterfront Committee of the Vision Plan Task Force. At that time, the site was known as the Furgary Boat Club, and approaching the cluster of shacks, I felt as if I had wandered onto the set of a Northeastern remake of Deliverance. Since then, after learning about the site's long, rich history, I have become an advocate for the shacks, and in 2015, as an interested third party, I submitted an official request to the State Historic Preservation Office for an eligibility evaluation of the site. That request resulted in a determination that the site met the eligibility requirements for listing in the State and National Registers of Historic Places.

Shared Streets Critic Revealed

On Tuesday, Gossips reported that, at a special meeting of the Tourism Board the previous day, Tamar Adler told her colleagues that 323 responses to the Tourism Board's Shared Streets survey had come from the same IP address. The 323 responses were all negative, and Adler said it was the first time since moving to Hudson that she felt angry and resentful. "This is something," Adler declared, "that someone should be embarrassed and ashamed of."

It turns out, the barrage of negative responses came from a 15-year-old kid who lives on Warren Street and finds Shared Streets "noisy, messy, and confusing." Aliya Schneider reported the story this evening in the Register-Star: "Teenager tests tourism board." The young man's father is quoted in the article as saying, "It wasn't meant as a vandalistic kind of thing to do, it was meant as a response to their (the board's) behavior, which has been been somewhat manipulative."

On Monday, Alderman Calvin Lewis, who chairs the Tourism Board, said the results of the survey, sans the 323 negative responses that had come from the same IP address, would be posted on the City of Hudson website within 48 hours. So far, that hasn't happened.

The Conversation about Sidewalks

The condition of the sidewalks in Hudson and what can be done to improve them has been a topic of discussion for quite a few years now--first in the Common Council Legal Committee, now in the Council ad hoc committee dedicated to sidewalks. 

What has been worked on for close to two years now is legislation that would shift the responsibility for the maintenance and repair of sidewalks from the owner of the adjacent property to the City and impose an annual fee on all property owners--both those subject to property taxes and those exempt--to fund sidewalk repair and replacement throughout the city. At the last meeting of the ad hoc committee, which took place on Tuesday, March 16, Council president Tom DePietro declared, "We have a good document now to work with," but so far that good document has not been shared with the public.

The last iteration of the legislation available on the city website defines the annual maintenance fees this way:
The annual maintenance fee for non-developable lots and sliver lots is $0; for lowfoot-traffic lots, it is $70; and for all other lots, it is $140.
Despite the fact that when those numbers were first written into the draft document in July 2019 it was acknowledged that they were simply placeholders, they have never changed, and in recent discussions, they have sometimes been spoken of as if they were real. At Tuesday's meeting, however, Jeff Baker, counsel to the Council, said that fees would be based on "street frontage and square footage," suggesting that the notion of flat fees may be inaccurate.

At Tuesday's meeting, Alderman Eileen Halloran (Fifth Ward) asked, "How do we prioritize this? How do we decide where the first money will be spent?" It was decided that prioritizing and creating an annual schedule of replacement and repair would be left to the superintendent and the commissioner of Public Works. 

Halloran, whose ward includes Hudson's "suburban" neighborhoods off Harry Howard Avenue, where there are no sidewalks, commented, "I can't figure out how we would present this to the taxpayers." Tiffany Garriga (Second Ward) countered, "When I go through my ward, that's all I hear. 'When are they going to fix the sidewalks?'" 

Toward the end of the meeting, DePietro asked Baker, "Where shall we go next?" Baker answered, "We need to make some policy decisions and decide what the assessments should be."  

The legislation will be subject to a permissive referendum.
COPYRIGHT 2021 CAROLE OSTERINK

COVID-19 Update

The Columbia County Department of Health has released its numbers for today. It appears we are having a little resurgence of COVID-19 here in Columbia County: 21 new cases since yesterday. The number of active cases being reported today is fifteen more than yesterday, from which it can be inferred that six more county residents are now considered to be recovering from the virus. There are 47 more county residents in mandatory quarantine today than yesterday, but the number hospitalized with the virus and in the ICU remains the same. There has not been a death from COVID-19 in Columbia County since Monday, March 15.

The New York Forward dashboard is reporting a positivity rate for Columbia County yesterday of 2.2 percent and a seven-day average of 1.8 percent. By comparison, the daily positivity rate for the Capital Region is 1.7 percent and the seven-day average is 1.9 percent.

Meeting News

The time of this evening's Common Council ad hoc committee meeting about alternate side of the street parking was finally revealed yesterday. The meeting will take place at 6:00 p.m. today, Thursday, March 18. The link to the Zoom meeting, however, has so far not been published. It should be published on the City of Hudson website later today. 

Promenade Hill: What Now?

On Tuesday, at the Common Council meeting, Mayor Kamal Johnson reported that the lowest bid for the construction of what is planned for lower plaza at Promenade Hill was $500,000 over budget. Last night, during his State of the Community event, Johnson said the project was going to have to be "scaled back." 

It is not known how much of the $1.1 million in DRI funds designated for the project was budgeted for construction, but cutting half a million dollars is going to require a lot of scaling back. Johnson said it would add three weeks to the project's schedule for completion. Three weeks suggests the stripped down version of the plan will not get any kind of review by the Historic Preservation Commission or the public.
COPYRIGHT 2021 CAROLE OSTERINK

JLE: Following the Process

We know from Council president Tom DePietro that a developer is interested in buying the former John L. Edwards school building and adaptively reusing it for affordable housing. At the Council meeting on Tuesday, DePietro said the negotiations were "bogged down on the school district side." 

Photo: Jonathan Simons
Gossips has since learned that there is to be a special meeting of the HCSD Board of Education on Tuesday, March 23. What follows is the meeting announcement: 
The HCSD Board of Education will hold a special meeting on Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 5 p.m. in Room 22-C at Hudson Senior High School. The purpose of the meeting is to accept a purchase offer for the former John L. Edwards Primary School. The Board will also enter an Executive Session to discuss the history of a particular person(s) and pending litigation. The agenda will be available in BoardDocs 24 hours before the meeting.

Attendees should park in the north parking lot (by the electronic sign) and use the entrance in that lot (a sign will be posted). Masks/face coverings and health screening required.

Gossips may just mask up and go to the meeting if only to find out who the developer is.
COPYRIGHT 2021 CAROLE OSTERINK

Wednesday, March 17, 2021

COVID-19 Update

The Columbia County Department of Health has released its numbers for today. Since yesterday, there have been fourteen new cases of COVID-19. The number of active cases being reported today is ten more than yesterday, from which it can be inferred that four more county residents are now considered to be recovering from the virus. There are nineteen more county residents in mandatory quarantine today than yesterday, two more hospitalized, and one more in the ICU. There has not been another death from COVID-19 in Columbia County since Monday, March 15.   

The New York Forward dashboard is reporting a positivity rate for Columbia County yesterday of 3.1 percent and a seven-day average of 1.5 percent. By comparison, the daily positivity rate for the Capital Region is 3.2 percent and the seven-day average is 1.7 percent.

Of Interest and Relevance

While the Hudson Housing Authority development subcommittee agonizes over the options of demolishing or rehabbing Bliss Towers, and there's a developer on the wings wanting to adapt the former John L. Edwards School for affordable housing, this article, which appeared yesterday in the New York Times, is of particular interest: "Affordable Housing Earns French Couple the Pritzker Prize." The article begins with these paragraphs:
Anne Lacaton and Jean-Philippe Vassal have never demolished a building in order to construct a new one.
The French architects, who are based in the Paris suburb of Montreuil, believe that every structure can repurposed, reinvented, reinvigorated. Now, after 34 years of putting that approach into practice, they have won their field's highest honor: the Pritzker Prize.
The entire article is recommended reading.