Thursday, May 16, 2024

Tonight at City Hall

Today, the following notice appeared on Instagram. 


It should be noted that the hearing is not actually about the Hudson Housing Authority's redevelopment plan, it is about the City's application for a Restore New York grant on behalf of the HHA redevelopment project. Given the guidelines for the Restore New York Grant Program, if the City were to receive the grant, the funding would have to be used for the demolition of Bliss Towers and Columbia Apartments. The maximum amount that can be received in Restore NY funding is $2 million. The redevelopment project is expected to cost $220 million.


Those opposed to the City using its single Restore NY application opportunity for the HHA project are concerned that support for the grant application will be used as evidence that the residents of Hudson are in favor of the overall project--a project that will more than double the number of units managed by HHA and a project whose plans have been assiduously kept from the public until just recently. A statement made by Jeffrey Dodson, executive director of HHA, after the Common Council passed a resolution in support of the grant application seems to validate that concern. Dodson told the Register-Star, "I'm excited the measure passed. This is a strong and clear decision to support us (the housing authority) with the 9-2 vote."

The hearing tonight takes place at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, and it will be in person only. Gossips has learned that those who wish to comment will be asked to sign up and their comments will be limited to three minutes.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

Wednesday, May 15, 2024

HHA and the Planning Board

The agenda for last night's Planning Board meeting indicated there was to be a presentation by the Hudson Housing Authority and Mountco Construction about the redevelopment planned for HHA properties. On Monday, at the informal meeting of the Common Council, Theresa Joyner, who chairs the Planning Board, said, because the Planning Board had a very full agenda, HHA and Mountco would be making a presentation next month. It seems no one told HHA and Mountco about this. Both Eu Ting-Zambuto, director of development for Mountco, and Jeffrey Dodson, executive director of HHA, attended last night's Planning Board meeting on Zoom and stayed for the entire meeting, which went on for three and a half hours. Just before the meeting ended, Ting-Zambuto posted this message in the "Chat":


The "preliminary redevelopment proposal," which can be found here, consists of the same five drawings that Gossips shared three weeks ago. Of interest is the "prelim Q&A," particularly this question and answer. 


Instead of integrating extremely low and very low income households into the existing community, something typically achieved by scattered site housing, the HHA plan "ensures that there is not a concentration of poverty" by combining households with higher incomes--from 50 to 80 percent of the area median income (AMI)--with the traditional public housing population. The information provided in the Q&A seems to suggest that, although HHA is committed to providing new housing for its current residents "in good standing," the number of units available to extremely low and very low income households, among 300 units HHA is hoping to build, will not be greater than what exists now. 

Tomorrow night, the Common Council holds a public hearing on the application for Restore NY funding for HHA's redevelopment project. The hearing is in person only at City Hall. On Monday, May 20, the Hudson Housing Authority Board of Commissioners holds its monthly meeting at 6:00 p.m. The meeting is a hybrid, taking place in person in the Community Room at Bliss Towers and on Zoom. Click here to join the meeting remotely.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

Beautification at the Entrance to Cedar Park

In March, Gossips reported that the Conservation Advisory Council was planning to improve the "landscaping" at the entrance to Cedar Park Cemetery. (Landscaping is in quotes because this is what has graced the entrance to Hudson's burying ground since 2019.)


This morning, the sewer pipe planters were removed, and the boulder was repositioned to make way for new plantings in the triangular traffic island.

Photo: Arone Dyer
Photo: Rich Volo

Here is what the CAC is planning for the landscaping at the entrance. Since this design was created, it was decided to plant a serviceberry tree instead of a crabapple tree.


Thanks to Arone Dyer, who serves on the CAC and is spearheading the project, and Rich Volo, who chairs the CAC and persuaded the group to take on this project, for providing Gossips with the pictures and news of the project's status.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

Opposition to Plans for the Boat Launch

It's been almost three years since Governor Kathy Hochul announced plans for the Hudson Eagles Recreation Area, an initiative to "improve public access and resiliency on the wild stretch of the Hudson River between Albany and Kingston and enhance connections to the waterfront communities in the region," and it's been almost two years since Gossips first posted about it, but it's only now that people in Hudson are taking note of the initiative and objecting to it.

The Hudson Eagles Recreation Area involves upgrades to five state boat launches--Coxsackie State Boat Launch, Schodack Island State Park, Crailo State Historic Site in Rensselaer, Athens State Boat Launch, and the Hudson Boat Launch. The upgrades at Coxsackie were first to be completed. Now it seems work on the project is getting around to the Hudson Boat Launch, and people are not happy about the changes that are coming.


Opposition to the proposed changes first came to light a week or so ago on Facebook. The biggest objection to the new design seems to be the loss of parking at the boat launch. A petition, titled "Preserve Parking at the State Boat Launch in Hudson, NY" and directed to Assemblymember Didi Barrett and Linda Cooper, Regional Director at NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, makes this appeal: 
Boaters and anglers, help STOP NYS from limiting our parking and access to the boat launch. Where will you park? The new design for the Hudson boat launch will severely limit parking for trucks and trailers.
The issue of parking also includes our local first responders who often report to the boat launch parking lot in emergencies. These men and women keep us safe on the water and are quick to help in an emergency. It could be detrimental to their response time to have to park far away.
The drawings below show the amount of parking now available at the boat launch and the amount that would exist after the proposed upgrades are completed.


Last night at the informal Common Council meeting, Nick Pierro, presenting the monthly report for the Fire Department, brought the issue of the proposed changes to the boat launch to the Council. He urged the Council to "get behind not supporting the changes," which he predicted would cause problems for emergency equipment needing to access the river and would reduce docking space. He described the proposed improvements as "turning the boat launch into a park" and called upon the Council to do something to prevent it from happening. 

Councilmember Rich Volo asked about the state's rationale for proposing the changes. In responding, Pierro implied there was no logical reason for making another park next to a park that already exists. A better answer to Volo's question can be found in the press release announcing the upgrades to the Coxsackie State Boat Launch back in September 2021. In that press release, Governor Hochul is quoted as saying this about the initiative:
The Upper Hudson River Estuary, a 60-mile stretch of the Hudson River from Albany to Kingston, is a globally significant ecological and recreational asset. The Hudson Eagles Recreation Area offers the opportunity to create a destination unlike any other, a water-based linear park that will draw more people to the Hudson River and better connect communities to the waterfront and waterway travelers.
In the same press release, Erik Kulleseid, Commissioner for Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, was quoted as saying this about the Hudson Eagles Recreation Area:  
This project is an exciting first step in better developing the recreational and educational potential of the Hudson River. New York State's work to foster cleaner air and water, and protect open space, has helped lead to the return of growing numbers of bald eagles to Hudson River Valley. The Hudson Eagles Recreation Area will celebrate this tremendous environmental accomplishment, improve access for active recreational groups, increase resiliency, and inspire more New Yorkers to appreciate and protect their natural world.
It was not determined last night if the Common Council intends to take any action to show opposition to the plan to upgrade the state boat launch in Hudson.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

Monday, May 13, 2024

Tonight at City Hall

Wrigs, the Hudson Police Department's newly acquired therapy dog, appeared tonight at the informal Common Council meeting. Councilmember Rich Volo (Fourth Ward) captured these pictures of Wrigs and shared them with Gossips.

  

Another Galvan Project

At Friday's meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission, Walter Chatham had two projects to present on behalf of the Galvan Foundation: 201 Union Street and 352 and 354 Warren Street, formerly the location of Johnny's Ideal Printing Company. 


Galvan acquired the two buildings in 2019. Now, five years later, they are submitting plans for the restoration and renovation of the buildings, seeking a certificate of appropriateness. The intention is to combine the two buildings into a single apartment building and to re-create what was once a storefront at 352 Warren Street. The proposal involves removing the composite shingles on 354 Warren and replacing them with Hardie board siding and removing the paint from the brick on 352 Warren. The drawings below show the buildings as they are now and the buildings with the changes proposed.


This drawing shows the buildings with the proposed changes in the context of the buildings on either side.


HPC member Miranda Barry suggested that approving the project should go step by step and recommended that the siding on 354 Warren be removed to see what is under it before the HPC approves the installation of Hardie board siding. Chatham said the siding could be removed this week, but Craig Haigh, code enforcement officer, reminded him that the siding needed to be tested for asbestos before it could be removed. The HPC agreed to review the proposal in steps and also requested historic photographs of the building. To date, the postcard image below is the only historic photograph of the buildings that Gossips knows of. The two buildings--352 and 354 Warren Street--appear in the lower left.

COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

Sunday, May 12, 2024

Meetings and Events in the Week Ahead

The past couple of weeks have been easy when it comes to meetings, but the break's over. The week ahead is chockablock with meetings to attend, in person or remotely.
  • On Monday, May 13, the Common Council holds a special meeting at 5:45 p.m. to authorize a revision to an earlier resolution authorizing the issuance of serial bonds to finance LED street lighting. The meeting is a hybrid, taking place in person at City Hall and on Microsoft Teams. Click here for the link to join the meeting remotely.
  • At 6:00 p.m. on Monday, May 13, the Common Council holds its monthly informal meeting. So far, there is not much on the agenda for the meeting, beyond the monthly reports from the various departments, but one thing of interest is a resolution to end the practice of offering reserved parking permits for the City parking lot at the train station. The meeting is a hybrid, taking place in person at City Hall and on Microsoft Teams. Click here for the link to join the meeting remotely.  
  • On Tuesday, May 14, the Planning Board meets at 6:30 p.m. The agenda for the meeting contains four projects that have been before the Planning Board for months, as well as two new items: a site plan application for "Mill Street Lofts" by Kearney Realty and Development Group and a presentation by Mountco Construction on the redevelopment being proposed by Hudson Housing Authority. The following description is given for Mill Street Lofts: "The proposed project includes constructing two (2) four-story buildings on the existing 3.31-acre lot. Housing a total of 70 residential units between the two buildings. The project also proposes new parking, utilities, and amenities to serve future tenants." If the Mill Street project is appearing before the Planning, it would seem the problem of the "reverter clause" has been resolved, but there has been no word either from the Hudson City School District or the City that this has happened. The Planning Board meeting is a hybrid, taking place in person at City Hall and on Zoom. Click here to join the meeting remotely.
Update: At the informal Common Council meeting tonight, it was revealed that Mountco had decided not to make a presentation to the Planning Board at this meeting. Rather they would do it next month.
  • On Wednesday, May 15, the Zoning Board of Appeals meets at 6:00 p.m. No agenda is as yet available for the meeting which takes place in person only at City Hall.
  • On Thursday, May 16, there is a public hearing on the City's Restore NY funding application for the Hudson Housing Authority's redevelopment project. The notice of the hearing on the city calendar contains this description: "The project involves the restoration and renovation of multiple properties including the demolition of Bliss Towers." In fact, there is no "restoration and renovation" of anything. The $2 million sought in Restore NY funds is only for the demolition of Bliss Towers, which cannot take place until a new building to house the 105 households currently residing in Bliss Towers has been constructed, which will not happen for at least two years. It appears the hearing will take place in person only at City Hall.
  • Also on Thursday, May 16, at 6:00, the Hudson Senior High School Student Council hosts a "Meet the Candidates" night in the Junior/Senior High School auditorium. The candidates are the five people vying for two seats on the Hudson City School District Board of Education: Micaela McClinton, Amanda Grubler, Daryl Blanks, Selha Graham, and Matthew Mackerer. The event will be livestreamed on the HCSD YouTube page.
  • On Saturday, May 18, Christ Church Episcopal holds its annual Spring-A-Fair Indoor Tag Sale. The event takes place from 9:00 a.m. to 3 p.m. at 431 Union Street.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

An Announcement from Hudson Hall

The following is a press release received from Hudson Hall:

Hudson Hall at the historic Hudson Opera House announces the public phase of its Rise Up! campaign, a $1 million initiative sparked by a generous $500,000 1:1 philanthropic matching gift from the Reinhart Foundation. This ambitious campaign will help Hudson Hall retire its mortgage and secure the future of its historic landmark building, New York State’s oldest surviving theater. With the support of several catalytic leadership gifts, the Rise Up! campaign has already achieved 80 percent of its goal and aims to conclude by the end of 2024. To learn more about how you can support the campaign, visit hudsonhall.org/rise-up-campaign or contact Katherine Peck, director of Institutional Giving, at katherine@hudsonhall.org
In announcing the campaign, Hudson Hall also unveils the naming for major gifts received:
    • The R & R Lounge (Common Council Room), named in recognition of a generous gift from the Reinhart Foundation in memory of Myron H. and Evelyn D. Reinhart, by Cynthia R. Richards, Christopher Richards, and William Reinhart.
    • The Asbjorn Lunde Gallery (Center Hall Gallery), named in honor of Asbjorn Lunde (1927-2017), a proud New Yorker and Columbia County resident with a passion for art, opera, and music. 
Additionally, Hudson Hall announces the naming for major contributions made to its Next Stage Campaign, a $9.5 million restoration of its magnificent performance hall and its first floor galleries completed in 2017, elevating its presentation of art, music, opera, dance, theater, and performance to new heights:
    • The “Ellenvator” (elevator), affectionately named in recognition of longtime board member Ellen V. Thurston’s generous support and exceptional service to Hudson Hall.
    • The Gary Schiro Landing (on the grand staircase), named in honor of Hudson Hall’s beloved founding executive director. 
    • The Hudson Hall Donor Wall, dedicated to those donors who, since 1992, have transformed Hudson Hall from a derelict building into a vibrant cultural organization. 
Hudson Hall at the historic Hudson Opera House is a cultural beacon in the Hudson Valley, offering a dynamic year-round schedule of music, theater, dance, literature, workshops for youth and adults, as well as family programs and large-scale community events. Approximately 70 percent of its programs are offered free of charge or greatly subsidized through its Community Arts Program, ensuring equitable access to the arts for all. 
In 2017, Hudson Hall completed a comprehensive $9.5 million restoration. In making the building fully ADA accessible for the first time in its history, Hudson Hall took out a $3 million loan, which has since been reduced to under $1.5 million. 
“The Reinhart Foundation’s extraordinary gift to help us retire our mortgage will allow us to redirect essential resources to focus on our mission of delivering the finest of cultural arts experiences to our audiences,” said Paul Barrett, president of the Hudson Hall Board of Directors. “It will also set the stage for establishing an endowment to maintain our beautifully restored building for future generations.” 
Cynthia R. Richards, secretary/treasurer of the Reinhart Foundation and Hudson Hall board member, stated, “We are honored to support Hudson Hall’s Rise Up! campaign and contribute to the preservation of this vital cultural institution. My parents, Bud and Evelyn Reinhart, believed in the power of the arts to transform communities, and it is our privilege to continue their legacy through this partnership." 
“The Rise Up! campaign marks a significant milestone for Hudson Hall as we strive to secure our future,” said Tambra Dillon, Hudson Hall’s executive director. “We are deeply grateful for the support of the Reinhart Foundation, the Asbjorn Lunde Foundation, and all those who have so generously stepped up to ensure Hudson Hall remains a vibrant and accessible cultural anchor for generations to come.”
Upon successful completion of the Rise Up! campaign, Hudson Hall will reduce its mortgage to $500,000, bringing its goal of retiring the mortgage within reach. 

Saturday, May 11, 2024

Today's the Day!

Today is the Mad Hatter's Parade! 


The parade steps off at 2:00 p.m. from the Hudson Area Library, 51 North Fifth Street, and makes its way through the streets of Hudson to Promenade Hill. Here is the route.


Don some outrageous headgear and join the procession, or just watch from the curb and cheer them on.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

Friday, May 10, 2024

Friday Morning at the HPC

This morning, at the Historic Preservation Commission meeting, Walter Chatham, who appears before the HPC on behalf of the Galvan Foundation with astonishing regularity, presented a proposal for 201 Union Street. The house is the Aaron C. Macy House, one of the earliest houses in Hudson, associated with the original Proprietors. (For those who have been in Hudson for a while, this was the home of Timothy Dunleavy, founder of Historic Hudson and proprietor of Rural Residence. The house was purchased by Galvan after Dunleavy's death in 2014.) 

201 Union Street in May 2014
What's being proposed is the addition of a porch to the south wing of 201 Union Street, similar to the porch on the adjacent house at 34 South Second Street, a house that was acquired by Eric Galloway (the Gal of Galvan) in 2004.


The addition of a porch involves the removal of the hood that is now over the doorway, an architectural element Chatham said he thought was original to the house. He assured the commission, however, that it would be saved and possibly reused on some other Galvan-owned property in Hudson. Chatham explained that the porch was being built because the current occupant of the house, a Galvan employee, wants a porch.


Although HPC member John Schobel said he didn't think wanting a porch was a good enough reason to alter a historic building and eliminate authentic historic detail and suggested the project needed a public hearing, the commission voted to waive a public hearing and instruct the HPC's attorney to prepare a certificate of appropriateness. Only two members of the commission--Schobel and Paul Barrett, the historian member of the HPC--voted against approving the project. Prior to the vote, Phil Forman, who chairs the commission, said something about historic preservation having to accommodate "issues of liveability," and Kim Wood, the architect member of the HPC, said she liked the idea that the door hood "might turn up on another building [in Hudson]." At the end of the meeting, audience member Ronald Kopnicki expressed the opinion that there had not been sufficient discussion of the project prior to the vote, and Gossips agrees.

The HPC seemed to accept without question the argument that a porch on 201 Union Street would be appropriate because there was already a porch on 34 South Second Street, a house that is essentially a duplicate of 201 Union Street. The truth is that, up until 2010, neither house had a porch--information that would have come to light had there been a public hearing on the project or if the HPC had taken a little more time to consider what was being proposed. 

34 South Second Street in 2010 
The porch on 34 South Second Street was originally part of a plan, presented to the HPC not long after Eric Galloway acquired the house in 2004, to divide the house into two separate dwellings. The status of the north wing as a separate dwelling was to be enhanced by the addition of a "sitting porch." The idea of dividing the house into two houses was abandoned in 2010, because it was determined there was no way to make the north wing big enough to be "marketable." The "sitting porch," however, survived the change of plan. 


Now, it seems, there are to be two such porches along South Second Street, sitting almost side by side--"almost" because the one at 201 Union will be five feet closer to the street than the one at 34 South Second.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

Prepare to Vote

On Tuesday, May 21, voters in the Hudson City School District will be asked to vote on the proposed $55.6 million budget for the 2024-2025 school year and to elect two members of the HCSD Board of Education. To view the presentation of the budget that was made at the budget hearing on May 7, click here. For information about the five candidates who are vying for the two vacant seats on the Board of Education, click here. The candidates are:
  • Micaela McClinton
  • Amanda Grubler
  • Daryl Blanks
  • Selha Graham (who currently serves on the board)
  • Matthew Mackerer
On Thursday, May 16, the Hudson Senior High School Student Council is hosting a "Meet the Candidates" night. Members of the student council will ask the candidates "student-centered questions" and will provide a platform for candidates to communicate their ideas and goals to the "residents of the school community." The announcement of the event stresses it "will not be a question-and-answer session between community members and the candidates." 

The event will take place at 6:00 p.m. in person at the Hudson Junior/Senior High School auditorium and will be livestreamed on the HCSD YouTube page.  
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

Thursday, May 9, 2024

Mark Your Calendars

Claire Cousin, county supervisor representing the First Ward, posted the following information on Facebook yesterday:
Space Utilization Committee is meeting on May 22 at 3:30 at 401 State in the Committee Room. It is my understanding there will be updates on 11 Warren St.

Should you not already know, the Columbia County Board of Supervisors purchased the fifty-year-old, out-of-place, failed strip mall building last summer from the Galvan Foundation, with the intention of relocating the Board of Elections as well as the Probation Department, the Public Defender's office, and the District Attorney's office to the building, thus perpetuating its existence for at least another thirty years, probably more. The plan drew opposition from Hudson residents and some Hudson elected officials who objected to postponing, for another three to five decades, any hope of replacing this relic of misguided urban planning with more appropriate development for Hudson's main street and riverfront neighborhood. A petition opposing the plan is still available for signature here

The idea of purchasing the building originated with the Board of Supervisors Space Utilization Committee, and attendance at the meeting on Wednesday, May 22, at 3:30 p.m., will remind the committee that Hudson residents are not happy with that decision.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

Wednesday, May 8, 2024

Of Interest

Photo: Will Waldron | Times Union
Always on the lookout for a good Hudson story, Roger Hannigan Gilson published this story today in the Times Union: "Hudson takes step forward in doubling public housing units." For those who have been following this story on Gossips, there is no new information here, but it's always good to read about an issue from a different perspective.

A New Chapter for Ockawamick

Ockawamick, as some readers will remember, is an abandoned elementary school, once part of the Taconic Hills School District, located on Route 217 in the Town of Claverack. 

Ockawamick School in 2008
In 2008, the Columbia County Board of Supervisors purchased the building for $1.5 million. The plan, which was lavishly researched and vigorously promoted, was to relocate the Department of Social Services to that location and make the building the centerpiece of a new county "campus" at the geographic center of the county . . . six miles from the county seat. The plan met with passionate protest, and eventually it was abandoned.

In 2014, the building was sold at auction for $502,500--about a third of what the Board of Supervisors had paid for it six years before. If memory serves, the purchaser of the building at that time was the late Eleanor Ambos.

Today, the New York Times reports on the latest development in the building's post-academic life: "An Abandoned School Becomes a Canvas for Art Galleries." Here is the lede from the article:
In a spirit of cooperation, six midsize art galleries are extending their reach beyond Manhattan with the purchase of a sprawling abandoned school in Columbia County, N.Y., that will be inaugurated as a new exhibition platform called the Campus on June 29.
This picture, showing the building today, accompanied the article.

Photo: Yael Eban and Matthew Gamber, via The Campus
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

Tuesday, May 7, 2024

Affordable Housing Elsewhere

The Albany Business Review reported today on the progress of two apartment buildings being proposed for Albany: "Two Albany apartment projects take major steps toward construction." The two buildings, being proposed by two different developers, are located on the same street--Colvin Avenue, just off Central Avenue. 


Both buildings have financial backing from NYS Homes and Community Renewal. One of the buildings will have 120 units and is expected to cost $46.3 million (roughly $385,833 per unit); the other will have 63 units and is expected to cost $30.6 million (roughly $485,714 per unit). In the 120-unit building, 30 units will be set aside for veterans at risk of homelessness, 30 units will be set aside for seniors at similar risk, and the rest will be for households with incomes from 50 to 80 percent of the area median income (AMI). The 63-unit building is intended for households with incomes from 30 to 80 percent of the AMI.

This rendering of the 63-unit building, which accompanied the article in the Albany Business Review, is what inspired this post. 


The neo-Brutalist design of this building is reminiscent of the design of a building completed in Albany a few years ago--one that Revonda Smith, who chairs the Hudson Housing Authority Board of Commissioners, has frequently cited as a building that should be emulated here in Hudson.  

Photo: Dave Lucas | WAMC
So far, we haven't seen any designs for the buildings HHA wants to construct in Hudson. We can only hope they look nothing like these. 


Maybe with a price tag of more than $733,000 a unit, what we get will look better than the buildings proposed and already constructed in Albany.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

Sunday, May 5, 2024

Meetings and Events in the Week Ahead

A lot of rain is predicted for the week ahead, but despite the bleak forecast, here is what is happening.
  • On Tuesday, May 7, the Conservation Advisory Council meets at 6:00 p.m. The meeting is a hybrid, taking place in person at City Hall and on Microsoft Teams. Click here for the link to join the meeting remotely.
  • On Wednesday, May 8, the Housing Trust Fund Board meets at 5:30 p.m. The meeting is a hybrid, taking place in person at City Hall and on Microsoft Teams. Click here for the link to join the meeting remotely. 
Update: The Housing Trust Fund meeting has been canceled.
  • On Thursday, May 9, at 6:00 p.m., Susan Stessin-Cohn speaks about her more than twenty years of research into the history of slavery in the Hudson Valley and the second edition of her book In Defiance: Runaways from Slavery in New York's Hudson River Valley, 1735-1831. The event takes place in the Community Room at the Hudson Area Library, 501 North Fifth Street. Click here for more information.  
  • On Friday, May 10, the Historic Preservation Commission meets at 10:00 a.m. The meeting is a hybrid, taking place in person at City Hall and on Microsoft Teams. Click here for the link to join the meeting remotely.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CAROLE OSTERINK

This Week at the Library

On Thursday, May 9, at 6:00 p.m., at the Hudson Area Library, Susan Stessin-Cohn, former professor of social studies education at SUNY New Paltz and director of education at Historic Huguenot Street, and current New Paltz historian, will speak on her more than twenty years of research into the history of slavery in the Hudson River Valley, with a particular focus on the plight of the “runaways”—enslaved persons who sought freedom by escaping from their enslavers.


Stessin-Cohn and coauthor Ashley Hurlburt-Biagini, the former manager of collections and archives at Historic Huguenot Street, combed through newspaper archives and databases, microfilm and library special collections—even dusty attics—seeking newspaper notices placed by Hudson Valley enslavers offering rewards for the return of their “property.” They found more than 750 such advertisements, as well as local notices for runaways apprehended, advertisements for enslaved persons for sale, and offers to purchase. In 2016, they published In Defiance: Runaways from Slavery in New York’s Hudson River Valley, 1735–1831

Continuing their research, Stessin-Cohn and Hurlburt-Biagini discovered more than 250 additional runaway notices that prompted them to rewrite and greatly expand In Defiance in a newly released second edition. This primary source material offers fleeting glimpses of hundreds of lives caught up in the cruelty of slavery—right here in our own Hudson Valley.

New York State passed its first emancipation act, “An Act for the Gradual Abolition of Slavery,” in 1799, giving hope to thousands of enslaved persons held on farms and in villages in the Hudson River Valley from Westchester and Orange counties north to Albany, Schenectady, and Troy. But many held in slavery were not willing to wait for what turned out to be a very gradual emancipation, as evidenced by the hundreds of newspaper notices posted by Hudson Valley enslavers promising rewards for runaway enslaved persons throughout the early 19th century all the way up to 1831. The stories these newspaper notices tell, together with the stories of hundreds of other enslaved persons who ran for their freedom earlier in the 18th century, shed revealing light on the life of enslaved persons held in the Hudson Valley.

Most enslaved persons held in the Hudson River Valley lived, worked, and died, leaving behind no historical record—no birth certificates, no marriage records, no death certificates, unmarked graves. In Defiance rescues more than 900 of those individuals from obscurity because they decided to free themselves. When their enslavers placed notices in local and New York City newspapers offering rewards for their return, they not only gave identity to some of the enslaved people, but also unwittingly indicted themselves before the bar of historical judgment. Surnames synonymous with Hudson Valley history—names like Schuyler, Van Rensselaer, Beekman, Rockefeller, Van Cortlandt, Van Buren, Livingston—appear throughout the book as the authors of the notices advertising rewards for the return of their enslaved “property.”

Had these freedom seekers not run away, they too, like the tens of thousands of enslaved persons who did not run, would have been lost to history, but by running they prompted reward notices for their return—notices that often provide at least their first names, sometimes a surname as well, and detailed descriptions of their age, color, gender, origin, language proficiency, and skills.

In addition to the reproduction and transcription of 774 archival newspaper notices for runaways from Hudson Valley enslavers, In Defiance also includes notices advertising runaways captured and enslaved persons for sale, notices offering to purchase enslaved persons, and selected runaway notices from outside the Hudson River Valley region. Nine tables analyze the data in the 774 notices for runaways from Hudson Valley enslavers. The book also includes a glossary, indexes of names, locations, and subjects, thirty-six illustrations, and five maps from the 18th and 19th centuries.

Following the presentation on Thursday, Stessin-Cohn will be on hand to meet and answer questions and to autograph copies of In Defiance. Books will be available for sale courtesy of Spotty Dog Books & Ale.

Friday, May 3, 2024

A Tale of Two Municipalities

The Town of Stuyvesant and the City of Hudson are both currently working on updating their comprehensive plans. Stuyvesant's comprehensive plan was adopted in 1996; Hudson's in 2002. Earlier this week, Stuyvesant kicked off the work of revising its comprehensive plan with a joint workshop with the town's Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals. The workshop was an open meeting, and the public was urged to participate. The following is quoted from a message from Stuyvesant supervisor Ron Knott, which appeared on the Town of Stuyvesant website:
As much as we need a professional firm, they cannot do their job effectively without input from local residents. Our town planning and zoning boards know best what issues are challenging our town.
We have planned a joint workshop for April 30th at 6 pm at our town hall. This is an open meeting where I look to gather ideas from all involved. Those ideas can become goals for either a grant application or direction for a professional firm to guide us through this process. Please come and discuss your perceived challenges that could help guide Stuyvesant for years to come!
By comparison, here in Hudson, work on a new comprehensive plan has been going on for several months now in "internal meetings" with Public Works Partners, the consultants that have been hired for the project. Involved in those internal meetings were Mayor Kamal Johnson, Council president Tom DePietro, former mayor's aide Michael Hofmann, and housing justice manager Michelle Tullo. 

Yesterday, the first effort to involve the public came with the launch of the Community Preference Survey. The press release announcing the launch also reveals the names of the people chosen to serve on the steering committee (there are thirteen rather than twelve as originally announced). It seems the steering committee was formed two months ago, but the members of the committee were never announced until now. Speaking of the steering committee at the Common Council meeting in March, DePietro said it was made up of people "who are not involved in politics at all," explaining, "The idea was to reach out to a demographic that doesn't normally show up to these kinds of meetings." It appears they succeeded in their goal, although it may be the case that a few of the names of the people involved are misspelled in the press release, which is reproduced, unedited, below.
Residents of Hudson are asked to complete a Community Preference Survey to provide their input for the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
The City of Hudson is actively developing an updated Comprehensive plan to guide its future land use and legislative priorities. The Plan will focus on all aspects of the City's future, including housing transportation, parks, economic development, and urban design, among other areas.
To ensure the Plan accurately reflects the community's priorities, Hudson residents will be engaged throughout 2024 and early 2025 through community meetings, surveys, and visioning sessions. Public Works Partners and SLR Consulting will assist the City of Hudson throughout the planning process.
The survey can be accessed at https://tinyurl.com/hudson2035
PURPOSE of the COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The City's existing Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 2002, is no longer reflective of the challenges and opportunities faced by the City. From the rise of short-term rentals to the expanded possibility of remote work for many jobs, the context that guides Hudson's land use priorities changed in the years since the previous plan's adoption. As a result of these changes, the City's demographics, key industries, and cost of living have affected residents--some benefitting, but others facing housing and employment challenges. An updated Comprehensive Plan, led by a community driven process, will ensure that land use decisions are aligned with the City's current needs and priorities.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROCESS
The Comprehensive Planning Process is an iterative process that begins with an analysis of existing conditions in Hudson, then seeks community input and feedback based on this analysis to craft a vision and goals for the future. Over the next year, the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan will be shaped by the public engagement process, input from City boards and stakeholders, and insight and feedback from the Steering Committee.
The general timeline looks like:
  • Jan-Mar 2024: Existing Conditions analysis and Steering Committee development
  • May 2024: Community preference Survey Launches
  • Late May/Early June 2024: Community Vision Workshop I
  • Summer 2024: Community Vision Workshop II
  • December 2024: Community Vision Workshop III
  • February 2025: Draft Recommendation
  • April 2025: Final Comprehensive Plan
STEERING COMMITTEE
A Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee of Hudson residents will volunteer their local expertise and vision throughout the planning process. Committee members will help ensure that engagement activities reach a diverse array of Hudson residents, provide feedback on early iterations of the Draft Comprehensive Plan, and contribute input at every stage of the project. Steering Committee members include:
    • Alex Elmasri
    • Alex Petraglia
    • Javed Iqbal
    • Jayden Cross
    • Jess Wallen
    • Joshua Cohen
    • Kali Michael
    • Kim Hunt
    • Liza Dolan
    • Pat Molly
    • Piper Olf
    • Shaina Marron
    • Sonja Okun
HOW TO STAY ENGAGED
The project seeks to develop a consensus-based vision and goals for Hudson’s future through a robust and accessible engagement process. Opportunities for residents to contribute to the City’s future will include:

We will be hosting the first Community Visioning Workshop later this spring, so stay tuned for the event details. You can also sign up for updates regarding events related to the Comprehensive Plan here:
https://www.hudsonny.gov/business/comprehensive_plan/index.php