There's no argument there. The design is pretty frumpy. The defense is that Digital Towpath, which is the platform used for the City website, has only a limited number of templates to choose from. There are currently 130 municipalities--villages, towns, counties, and one city (Hudson)--that use Digital Towpath, and you can find the links to all of these websites here. Clicking on the links, you will see the similarities, but you will also see that it is possible, even given the limitations, to create a fairly appealing design. The websites for the Village of Canajoharie and Franklin County are evidence of the possibilities.
Among the documents uploaded by the Department of Public Works is a report by Vince Wallace which lists all the Civil War veterans buried in the Grand Army of the Republic section of the cemetery and provides a map with the location of each grave.
Also among the DPW documents is the endlessly fascinating Water Tap Book, which will tell you not only when your house was hooked up to the municipal water supply, but also, if your house is located on an east-west street, what your house number was before the City switched to hundred blocks in 1888-1889.
If you click on "History" in the left column on the homepage, you will find all the previous versions of the city charter, from 1823 to 1949, and one hundred and fifty years of Common Council minutes—from 1833 to 1983.
The website is an extensive and valuable resource for Hudson residents, and all it needs is a facelift, some updating, and a little refinement. Perhaps it's possible with Digital Towpath, as it is with Google Blogger, to change the template and the look of the website without re-creating the whole thing.
COPYRIGHT 2015 CAROLE OSTERINK
Can't agree more, Carole. First priority, I would think, is gather up the complaints and suggestions and see how many can be solved with the Digital Towpath. For instance, there should be a page for Common Council instead of (or, at least in addition to) "Officials." I'm sure that's possible using DT.... But I agree, there's tons of great info to be had at http://cityofhudson.org/content/
ReplyDeleteWhat the public needs most are searchable documents.
ReplyDeleteWhen the waterfront program's Generic Environmental Impact Statement was posted as an unsearchable PDF, the Task Force went nuts. The document was quickly converted with OCR software, and then re-posted at the city website.
When we agitated for the release of the city's "Long Term Control Plan for Combined Sewer Overflows" - which the city had wrongly and secretly told the DEC was available at the library - the public prevailed. But what got posted at the DPW's webpage was a single, unsearchable, 839-page PDF; a barely usable document dump with the tiniest scroll bar you've ever seen. Take that!
Do people understand our form of government? Do we realize that we the public have paid for and OWN these materials?
The technology to make the information more accessible exists, but not the will to use it.
In comparison, the appearance of the city website is insignificant, a distraction. Let's get our priorities straight, then we can add all the colors we want.
i find that the city of hudson website does not work at all for me on mac using chrome/safari/firefox...it's impossible to download pdfs...does anyone else have the same experience?
ReplyDelete