Monday, January 18, 2021

News from the Planning Board: Galvan

The final project before the Planning Board on Tuesday was the Galvan Foundation plan for North Seventh Street, now dubbed "The Depot District." What is being proposed is two buildings--one with 84 units that will rent at market rate, the other with 54 units with permanently affordable rents for low- and moderate-income households. The idea is to satisfy the goals of the Strategic Housing Action Plan by creating, with two buildings, "a mixed income neighborhood."

The building proposed for 75 North Seventh Street is the building with affordable rents: 34 units for households earning between $23,000 and $42,000 a year, with rents starting at $533; 20 units for households earning between $45,000 and $65,000 a year, with rents starting at $1,140.




The building proposed for 708 State Street is larger, with 84 market rate units. Fitness rooms are promised for both buildings, but the plan for this building includes an outdoor pool. 


 
Both buildings are adjacent to a historic district, and Galvan has hired Beth Selig, who is, according to her LinkedIn profile, an archaeologist, to handle "the consultation process with SHPO [State Historic Preservation Office]." At the Planning Board meeting last Tuesday, Selig talked about the evolution of Hudson's architecture and how the architectural styles, as the city progressed east from the river, reflect the development of the city. She asserted that the proposed buildings "continue the ongoing evolution of the city and its architecture." 

Walter Chatham, formerly the chair of the Planning Board and now the architect for the project, presented these drawings to demonstrate that the proposed buildings were compatible in mass and scale with buildings that already exist in the neighborhood.

The first row of drawings above depicts (from left to right) the Pocketbook Factory, the Sixth Street School (now a county office building), the south side of the building proposed for 75 North Seventh Street, and the south side of the building proposed for 708 State Street. Oddly, the old Hudson Orphan Asylum building, which Galvan demolished early in 2018, seems to have been included in the drawing. The second row of drawings depicts (from left to right) the former Community Theatre building (now or soon to be owned by Galvan), a cluster of buildings that includes the no longer existing orphanage building, the former Canape garage (now owned by Galvan) with the Sixth Street School in the background, the building proposed for 75 North Seventh Street, and the Pocketbook Factory. 

In his presentation, Chatham said the design for 708 State Street had been inspired by 501 Union Street. 

Chatham told the board that this neighborhood was "the most logical area in the city for larger buildings" and predicted this project would "look like it's been there for a long time."

As was the case with the 77-unit building Galvan had originally proposed for 75 North Seventh Street, there is no plan to accommodate tenants' parking beyond six designated handicapped spots along the north side of the building proposed for 708 State Street. The expectation is that the tenants will find places to park on the street or they will park in the municipal lot on Columbia Street, which is reported to be 90 percent vacant overnight. 

Not only is the parking lot a five minute walk from the two buildings, it is currently the site of the Hudson Farmers Market. If this use of the lot continues, tenants living in the proposed new buildings will have to get up early on Saturday mornings to move their cars out of the lot before the market opens.

The two building projects are expected to move ahead simultaneously, but they will have "separate funding strategies." The project will be applying to the IDA (Industrial Development Agency) for financing. The application is expected to be presented to the IDA at its February meeting. A fifteen-month construction period is anticipated, for completion in 2023.
COPYRIGHT 2021 CAROLE OSTERINK

14 comments:

  1. Interesting to see Galvan using #501 Union St. for inspiration, given that they have let that structure sit for 10+ years with little or no progress on restoration.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is this development a done deal?
    I don't know how these developments happen regarding city giving the green light, but it would be criminal to allow this to happen without any parking for the tenants on site. It's unconscionable. Not only will those tenants often be forced to park in the city hall lot on Columbia, but so will I and all my neighbors. The parking situation is already tight around here on State in the Galvan district, esp. on Saturday nights -- this will just make things worse for everyone. And it could get nasty. No one should have to park 2 or 3 blocks from their house or apartment, or drive around searching for a spot like they do in Manhattan. Who the hell wants that?
    Kamal, is that what you want?
    B Huston

    ReplyDelete
  3. Notice, in the renderings, the lovely trees lining 7th street in front of these monstrosities. Now walk over to 7th and State and behold the so-called trees on the sidewalks surrounding Galvan's property. That's what the trees will actually look like: Insulting.
    B Huston

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've always said: Nothing good can happen under a fake mansard roof

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Walter, how about the trees we see in the renderings? Will those be "real" along the sidewalk?

      Delete
  5. Given that the design inspiration for 708 State is said to have come from Galvan's 501 Union Street holding, I'm concerned by Walter's claim that 708 State will "look like it's been there for a long time" -- does that mean it will be allowed to deteriorate and crumble like 501 Union has? It's a crime what Galvan has done to the Apartments of Distinction while he seeks more public funds (and public parking) for his serially ill-conceived and under-financed projects. Construction done in 18 months? Hah! The comedy never ends at the Hudson Planning Board.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hah is right! If GalVan just brought what units they do have back online, at these income thresholds.. well, there wouldn't be any need to bilk us for another fealty pledge. but GalVan has never been about affordable housing or architectural preservation.

      Delete
  6. How is putting two 70+ unit buildings but only 6 parking spaces sound city planning? This area of town is already congested with truck traffic, both from state thru trucks and local (Colarusso) gravel trucks. Developers are trying to cash in on the real estate rush here, but not plan for their developments' long term effect on the city. Also, saying "this neighborhood is the most logical area in the city for larger buildings" isn't saying much.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The public relations of this project, as always, are splashy and exciting, full of bold promises. I sure hope they endeavor to do what they say, housing precarity is a virus hollowing out our community. I am also glad they have an actual licensed architect creating the renderings, it would certainly be a first if GalVan literally builds what our planning board approves.

    We really need to wait to see what the financials are. Inertia is everything, and they've learned the game, which is precisely why the dollars to do this project are still a great big secret.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No secret,Dave -- you and I and all our neighbors will pay its taxes for 50 years if the developer and the City have their way. The rest will come from "investors" who purchase redevelopment bonds that Galvan will be certified to sell. In other words, out of town landlords.

      Delete
  8. It's the usual promise-everything-but-don't-deliver, shortsighted, boondoggle, money grab from Galvan. Nothing ever changes - especially the city's lay down and roll over obsequience to the Galvan organization. It's pathetic. In a town with about half of the necessary parking space, to build a development like that is unconscionable. SMH

    ReplyDelete
  9. I believe Galvan owns properties abutting or nearby which could be used for parking so not planning for parking is just inexcusable. Another BIG issue is the combination of clay soils and the waste water which will result from 176 new housing units. How will this increased usage of the city water system be financed? Last, real estate taxes --- what's the deal and how will it compare to what ordinary homeowners and small landlords now pay for their properties? There is a very obvious silence on this topic right now.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Everything about Galvan is self serving obscene.

    ReplyDelete