Hudson is buying a new giant ladder truck for the Fire Department. The discussion of replacing Tower 32, the KME Aerial Cat, acquired in 2001, has been going on for quite a while. In 2012, Nick Haddad, then an alderman representing the First Ward, calculated that in the ten years since the ladder truck had been acquired, the City had spend $150,000 in repairs--an average of $15,000 a year. This information was shared at a Council meeting at which Fire Department budget transfers were being approved to amass $15,449.59 in the account designated for maintenance and repair of equipment. About $9,000 of that amount was needed for repairs to Tower 32.
In December 2019, the Common Council unanimously passed a bond resolution authorizing "the acquisition of a ladder truck at an estimated maximum cost of $1,440,000 and authorizing the issuance of serial bonds . . . in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $1,087,500 . . . to finance the cost thereof." On December 31, 2019, the Hudson Fire Department announced it had awarded a contract to E-One to build a new aerial truck for the City of Hudson. The equipment is being built to the department's specifications, and delivery of the truck is expected early in 2021.
At the Common Council Finance Committee meeting this past Tuesday, during the discussion of the City's revenue loss and expenditures in 2020, Alderman Rebecca Wolff (First Ward) suggested that the purchase of the ladder truck should be canceled. City treasurer Heather Campbell told her the contract had been in place for a year. It was also pointed out that the Council had unanimously authorized the purchase and the issuance of bonds for the purchase in December 2019. Nevertheless, Wolff made the same suggestion during the regular meeting of the Common Council.
COPYRIGHT 2020 CAROLE OSTERINK
Alderwoman Wolff’s presence on the Finance Committee is truly a mystery as her suggestion indicates a simultaneous lack of understanding of municipal finance, how ISO ratings affect property owners’ insurance rates and the long term cost of maintaining superannuated capital equipment. We’re there no voices of experience or knowledge on the Zoom call?
ReplyDeleteI hope Mr. Friedman runs for alderman. He'd have my vote!
ReplyDeleteYES PLEASE!
DeleteIronically this fits with Comrade Wolff's scorched earth plan for Hudson. She has repeatedly said she would like to see all businesses on Warren Street closed. I guess she also wants to see them in flames and burning to the ground. Perhaps she might begin budget cutting with her own yearly stipend from the city (after all as we know she lives off her trust fund- why does she need this stipend?) and questioning why the mayor has a $40K-50K per year assistant who will receive a $10K raise in 2021. I suppose that wouldn't fit her ideals as a socialist. Great work Comrade! Great work!
DeleteIf this million dollar fire truck was originally proposed any time in the past 9 months, would it have even been considered? Buyer's remorse, indeed.
ReplyDeleteYou have to understand the timeline on a capital purchase such as a firetruck. These aren't spur of the moment purchases, nor the decisions to make them. As the original post in this topic points out, the decision to purchase this truck began years ago on the basis of an understanding of what the future costs of maintaining the apparatus would be vs. its resale value to another community (there are almost always takers) vs. its impact on the City's ISO rating. If the Treasurer's suggestion had been carried through by subsequent Councils as it was by earlier ones, the amount needed for bonding today would be less. What wouldn't change is the advisability of making the purchase.
DeleteThanks John.
DeleteWe need explanation for things for which we don't pay attention